Frontline healthcare worker barriers impacting tuberculosis service demand and access in high burden settings: a scoping review.

IF 5.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Samyra R Cox, Colleen F Hanrahan, Aye Hnin Moe, Kate Shearer, Canice Christian, Sejal Sethi, Mollie Hudson, Manami Ueshima, Kalee Singh, Jane Dawson, Ketholelie Angami, Nyiko Kubai, Mangala Namasivayam, Priya Shete, Jonathan E Golub, Andrew D Kerkhoff
{"title":"Frontline healthcare worker barriers impacting tuberculosis service demand and access in high burden settings: a scoping review.","authors":"Samyra R Cox, Colleen F Hanrahan, Aye Hnin Moe, Kate Shearer, Canice Christian, Sejal Sethi, Mollie Hudson, Manami Ueshima, Kalee Singh, Jane Dawson, Ketholelie Angami, Nyiko Kubai, Mangala Namasivayam, Priya Shete, Jonathan E Golub, Andrew D Kerkhoff","doi":"10.7189/jogh.16.04243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extensive literature exists on health-seeking behaviour and barriers related to the uptake of tuberculosis (TB)-related services in high TB burden settings. However, prior reviews have focused on patient- and health facility/systems-level barriers to TB-related care. In this scoping review, we aimed to synthesise frontline healthcare worker (FLHCW)-related barriers that limit individuals' demand for, access to, and retention in TB services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed for studies describing FLHCW-related barriers that impact demand for and/or access to TB services (preventive treatment, active case finding, diagnosis and treatment initiation, treatment completion, and post-TB care). We included studies that were published between 2010 and 2025 in English, and that reported on original research findings from the World Health Organization lists of high TB burden countries. Two reviewers independently conducted title and abstract screening, and full-text review. We narratively summarised barriers by theme and applied the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) framework to facilitate interpretation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We screened a total of 5,306 records, and included 189 studies, most of which were from India, South Africa, and Ethiopia. Among the included studies, most reported barriers were for doctors (n = 101, 53%) and nurses (n = 82, 43%). Studies identified FLHCW-related barriers at every step of the care cascade except for post-TB care. Knowledge and skill gaps leading to missed opportunities to engage or retain individuals in care were the most frequent barriers identified (n = 128 studies). Other major themes included provider-patient communication, discrimination and stigma from FLHCWs, and motivation to provide quality TB clinical care. Mapping barriers onto COM-B identified actionable targets for strategies to improve TB care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FLHCW-related barriers to TB care are pervasive and multifaceted, affecting the care cascade from prevention to diagnosis to treatment initiation and completion. Addressing these barriers will require multi-component implementation strategies that are context-specific and designed to empower FLHCWs as drivers of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"16 ","pages":"04243"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13587593/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.16.04243","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Extensive literature exists on health-seeking behaviour and barriers related to the uptake of tuberculosis (TB)-related services in high TB burden settings. However, prior reviews have focused on patient- and health facility/systems-level barriers to TB-related care. In this scoping review, we aimed to synthesise frontline healthcare worker (FLHCW)-related barriers that limit individuals' demand for, access to, and retention in TB services.

Methods: We searched PubMed for studies describing FLHCW-related barriers that impact demand for and/or access to TB services (preventive treatment, active case finding, diagnosis and treatment initiation, treatment completion, and post-TB care). We included studies that were published between 2010 and 2025 in English, and that reported on original research findings from the World Health Organization lists of high TB burden countries. Two reviewers independently conducted title and abstract screening, and full-text review. We narratively summarised barriers by theme and applied the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) framework to facilitate interpretation.

Results: We screened a total of 5,306 records, and included 189 studies, most of which were from India, South Africa, and Ethiopia. Among the included studies, most reported barriers were for doctors (n = 101, 53%) and nurses (n = 82, 43%). Studies identified FLHCW-related barriers at every step of the care cascade except for post-TB care. Knowledge and skill gaps leading to missed opportunities to engage or retain individuals in care were the most frequent barriers identified (n = 128 studies). Other major themes included provider-patient communication, discrimination and stigma from FLHCWs, and motivation to provide quality TB clinical care. Mapping barriers onto COM-B identified actionable targets for strategies to improve TB care.

Conclusions: FLHCW-related barriers to TB care are pervasive and multifaceted, affecting the care cascade from prevention to diagnosis to treatment initiation and completion. Addressing these barriers will require multi-component implementation strategies that are context-specific and designed to empower FLHCWs as drivers of care.

在高负担环境中影响结核病服务需求和获取的一线卫生保健工作者障碍:范围审查。
背景:在高结核病负担环境中,存在大量关于寻求健康行为和与接受结核病相关服务相关的障碍的文献。然而,先前的审查侧重于患者和卫生设施/系统层面的结核病相关护理障碍。在这一范围综述中,我们旨在综合一线卫生保健工作者(FLHCW)相关的障碍,这些障碍限制了个人对结核病服务的需求、获取和保留。方法:我们检索了PubMed中描述flhcv相关障碍的研究,这些障碍会影响对结核病服务的需求和/或获取(预防性治疗、主动病例发现、诊断和治疗开始、治疗完成和结核病后护理)。我们纳入了2010年至2025年间用英语发表的研究,这些研究报告了世界卫生组织结核病高负担国家名单上的原始研究结果。两位审稿人独立进行标题和摘要筛选,以及全文审稿。我们将障碍按主题进行叙述性总结,并应用能力、机会、动机-行为(COM-B)框架来促进解释。结果:我们共筛选了5306份记录,包括189项研究,其中大部分来自印度、南非和埃塞俄比亚。在纳入的研究中,大多数报告的障碍是医生(n = 101, 53%)和护士(n = 82, 43%)。研究发现,除结核病后护理外,在护理级联的每个步骤都存在与flhcv相关的障碍。最常见的障碍是知识和技能差距,导致错过了吸引或留住护理人员的机会(n = 128项研究)。其他主要主题包括提供者与患者之间的沟通、来自FLHCWs的歧视和污名,以及提供高质量结核病临床护理的动机。将这些障碍映射到结核防治中,确定了改善结核病治疗战略的可行目标。结论:与flhcv相关的结核病治疗障碍是普遍和多方面的,影响着从预防到诊断到治疗开始和完成的护理级联。解决这些障碍将需要针对具体情况的多组件实施战略,并旨在增强flhcows作为护理驱动者的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书