Small Group Instruction Can Improve Adolescent Mental Health and Peer Relations: Findings From A Technology-Assisted Cooperative Learning Intervention.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Psychology in the Schools Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-30 DOI:10.1002/pits.70183
Sabina Low, Mark Van Ryzin, Sun-Kyung Lee, Kimberly R M Osborne, Brooke Johnson, Stanley A Garbacz
{"title":"Small Group Instruction Can Improve Adolescent Mental Health and Peer Relations: Findings From A Technology-Assisted Cooperative Learning Intervention.","authors":"Sabina Low, Mark Van Ryzin, Sun-Kyung Lee, Kimberly R M Osborne, Brooke Johnson, Stanley A Garbacz","doi":"10.1002/pits.70183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Internalizing symptoms in adolescents (e.g., anxiety, loneliness, depression) increased following the COVID-19 pandemic, and can have detrimental impacts on engagement, learning, and overall school success. Cooperative Learning (CL), a small-group instructional approach that creates intergroup collaboration among students, has an extensive track record of improving peer relations and school belonging, which may reduce social stress and protect against internalizing symptoms. However, adhering to the key design principles that make CL successful can be difficult for teachers to do in their everyday practice, underscoring the need for technology-assisted CL. This study evaluated the first-year outcomes of a universal, technology-assisted CL intervention (i.e., PeerLearning.net) on peer relations and, in turn, internalizing symptoms. We also examined whether intervention effects varied by students' baseline symptom levels, sex, and race. Participants were 9th-grade students (N = 691; 55% female; 45% non-White) from 13 high schools in Oregon and Arizona, and student surveys were administered in the fall (pre-test) and spring (post-test). Multilevel models were used to evaluate the efficacy of the intervention at the posttest, accounting for school-level clustering and contextual school characteristics. We found that students in intervention schools showed significantly more positive peer relations and reduced stress, anxiety, depression, and loneliness as compared to control schools. Moderation analyses indicated that students with higher initial peer stress, victimization and loneliness benefited the most, showing greater reductions in symptoms. These findings support universal, scalable, and integrated approaches to youth mental health in the post-COVID era.</p>","PeriodicalId":48182,"journal":{"name":"Psychology in the Schools","volume":"63 10","pages":"1530-1541"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13580322/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology in the Schools","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.70183","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Internalizing symptoms in adolescents (e.g., anxiety, loneliness, depression) increased following the COVID-19 pandemic, and can have detrimental impacts on engagement, learning, and overall school success. Cooperative Learning (CL), a small-group instructional approach that creates intergroup collaboration among students, has an extensive track record of improving peer relations and school belonging, which may reduce social stress and protect against internalizing symptoms. However, adhering to the key design principles that make CL successful can be difficult for teachers to do in their everyday practice, underscoring the need for technology-assisted CL. This study evaluated the first-year outcomes of a universal, technology-assisted CL intervention (i.e., PeerLearning.net) on peer relations and, in turn, internalizing symptoms. We also examined whether intervention effects varied by students' baseline symptom levels, sex, and race. Participants were 9th-grade students (N = 691; 55% female; 45% non-White) from 13 high schools in Oregon and Arizona, and student surveys were administered in the fall (pre-test) and spring (post-test). Multilevel models were used to evaluate the efficacy of the intervention at the posttest, accounting for school-level clustering and contextual school characteristics. We found that students in intervention schools showed significantly more positive peer relations and reduced stress, anxiety, depression, and loneliness as compared to control schools. Moderation analyses indicated that students with higher initial peer stress, victimization and loneliness benefited the most, showing greater reductions in symptoms. These findings support universal, scalable, and integrated approaches to youth mental health in the post-COVID era.

小组教学可以改善青少年心理健康和同伴关系:来自技术辅助合作学习干预的结果。
2019冠状病毒病大流行后,青少年的内化症状(如焦虑、孤独、抑郁)有所增加,并可能对参与、学习和整体学业成功产生不利影响。合作学习(CL)是一种小组教学方法,在学生之间建立小组间协作,在改善同伴关系和学校归属感方面有着广泛的记录,这可能会减少社会压力并防止内化症状。然而,坚持使CL成功的关键设计原则对教师来说在日常实践中很难做到,这强调了对技术辅助CL的需求。本研究评估了一种通用的、技术辅助的CL干预(即PeerLearning.net)对同伴关系的第一年结果,进而评估了内化症状。我们还研究了干预效果是否因学生的基线症状水平、性别和种族而异。参与者是来自俄勒冈州和亚利桑那州13所高中的九年级学生(N = 691, 55%为女性,45%为非白人),学生调查在秋季(测试前)和春季(测试后)进行。在考虑学校层面聚类和情境学校特征的情况下,采用多层次模型在后测评估干预的效果。我们发现,与对照学校相比,干预学校的学生表现出更积极的同伴关系,减少了压力、焦虑、抑郁和孤独。适度分析表明,最初同伴压力、受害和孤独程度较高的学生受益最大,症状减轻幅度更大。这些发现支持在后covid时代采取普遍、可扩展和综合的青年心理健康方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychology in the Schools
Psychology in the Schools PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
200
期刊介绍: Psychology in the Schools, which is published eight times per year, is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to research, opinion, and practice. The journal welcomes theoretical and applied manuscripts, focusing on the issues confronting school psychologists, teachers, counselors, administrators, and other personnel workers in schools and colleges, public and private organizations. Preferences will be given to manuscripts that clearly describe implications for the practitioner in the schools.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书