Izabela da Silva Santos, Mariana Rinaldi Carvalho, Naiara Franco Baroni, Maria Carolina de Lima, Natalia Posses Carreira, Livia Castro Crivellenti, Daniela Saes Sartorelli
{"title":"Effect of maternal diet quality in early pregnancy on infant anthropometry at birth and at six months of age.","authors":"Izabela da Silva Santos, Mariana Rinaldi Carvalho, Naiara Franco Baroni, Maria Carolina de Lima, Natalia Posses Carreira, Livia Castro Crivellenti, Daniela Saes Sartorelli","doi":"10.1017/S2040174426100749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim was to investigate the association between maternal diet quality in early pregnancy and infant anthropometric outcomes at birth and at six months of age among Brazilian women with overweight. Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial included 238 pregnant women and 192 mother-infant pairs with data at birth and six months, respectively. 24-h dietary recalls were obtained between 3 and 15 gestational weeks. Diet quality was evaluated using the <i>Diet Quality Index Adapted for Pregnant Women (IQDaG</i>). Linear regression models adjusted for potential confounding factors, including treatment group (control/intervention) were used to investigate the associations. Higher maternal diet quality (I<i>QDaG</i> score) was positively associated with birth weight (<i>β</i> = 12.311; 95% CI: 5.163, 19.458; <i>p</i> = 0.001), birth weight <i>Z</i>-score (<i>β</i> = 0.024; 95% CI: 0.007, 0.041; <i>p</i> = 0.007), birth length (<i>β</i> = 0.050; 95% CI: 0.015, 0.084; <i>p</i> = 0.005), birth length <i>Z</i>-score (<i>β</i> = 0.030; 95% CI: 0.008, 0.052; <i>p</i> = 0.008), and ponderal index (<i>β</i> = 0.044; 95% CI: 0.010, 0.078; <i>p</i> = 0.011), and inversely associated with small for gestational age (<i>β</i> = -0.006; 95% CI: -0.009, -0.002; <i>p</i> = 0.002) and low birth weight (<i>β</i> = -0.007; 95% CI: -0.010, -0.003; <i>p</i> < 0.001). No significant associations were observed with others neonatal indicators. At six months of age, I<i>QDaG</i> score was positively associated with infant length (<i>β</i> = 0.061; 95% CI: 0.019, 0.103; <i>p</i> = 0.004) and length-for-age <i>Z</i>-score (<i>β</i> = 0.204; 95% CI: 0.007, 0.401; <i>p</i> = 0.006), but not with weight-related indicators. These findings suggest that better maternal diet quality in early pregnancy is associated with more favorable fetal growth and may be particularly related to linear growth during infancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49167,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease","volume":"17 ","pages":"e41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S2040174426100749","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim was to investigate the association between maternal diet quality in early pregnancy and infant anthropometric outcomes at birth and at six months of age among Brazilian women with overweight. Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial included 238 pregnant women and 192 mother-infant pairs with data at birth and six months, respectively. 24-h dietary recalls were obtained between 3 and 15 gestational weeks. Diet quality was evaluated using the Diet Quality Index Adapted for Pregnant Women (IQDaG). Linear regression models adjusted for potential confounding factors, including treatment group (control/intervention) were used to investigate the associations. Higher maternal diet quality (IQDaG score) was positively associated with birth weight (β = 12.311; 95% CI: 5.163, 19.458; p = 0.001), birth weight Z-score (β = 0.024; 95% CI: 0.007, 0.041; p = 0.007), birth length (β = 0.050; 95% CI: 0.015, 0.084; p = 0.005), birth length Z-score (β = 0.030; 95% CI: 0.008, 0.052; p = 0.008), and ponderal index (β = 0.044; 95% CI: 0.010, 0.078; p = 0.011), and inversely associated with small for gestational age (β = -0.006; 95% CI: -0.009, -0.002; p = 0.002) and low birth weight (β = -0.007; 95% CI: -0.010, -0.003; p < 0.001). No significant associations were observed with others neonatal indicators. At six months of age, IQDaG score was positively associated with infant length (β = 0.061; 95% CI: 0.019, 0.103; p = 0.004) and length-for-age Z-score (β = 0.204; 95% CI: 0.007, 0.401; p = 0.006), but not with weight-related indicators. These findings suggest that better maternal diet quality in early pregnancy is associated with more favorable fetal growth and may be particularly related to linear growth during infancy.
期刊介绍:
JDOHaD publishes leading research in the field of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD). The Journal focuses on the environment during early pre-natal and post-natal animal and human development, interactions between environmental and genetic factors, including environmental toxicants, and their influence on health and disease risk throughout the lifespan. JDOHaD publishes work on developmental programming, fetal and neonatal biology and physiology, early life nutrition, especially during the first 1,000 days of life, human ecology and evolution and Gene-Environment Interactions.
JDOHaD also accepts manuscripts that address the social determinants or education of health and disease risk as they relate to the early life period, as well as the economic and health care costs of a poor start to life. Accordingly, JDOHaD is multi-disciplinary, with contributions from basic scientists working in the fields of physiology, biochemistry and nutrition, endocrinology and metabolism, developmental biology, molecular biology/ epigenetics, human biology/ anthropology, and evolutionary developmental biology. Moreover clinicians, nutritionists, epidemiologists, social scientists, economists, public health specialists and policy makers are very welcome to submit manuscripts.
The journal includes original research articles, short communications and reviews, and has regular themed issues, with guest editors; it is also a platform for conference/workshop reports, and for opinion, comment and interaction.