Mini-Anchor Fixation vs Conservative Treatment for Hauck Type II Ulnar Styloid Fractures Associated With Distal Radius Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Wei Feng, Lei Wei, Shanqing Li, Juntan Wang, Qipeng Wu
{"title":"Mini-Anchor Fixation vs Conservative Treatment for Hauck Type II Ulnar Styloid Fractures Associated With Distal Radius Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Wei Feng, Lei Wei, Shanqing Li, Juntan Wang, Qipeng Wu","doi":"10.12659/MSM.953401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Hauck type II ulnar styloid fractures (USFs) occur at the base of the ulnar styloid process, where the triangular fibrocartilage complex attaches. Nonunion or disruption at this level may compromise distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) stability, although the clinical significance of associated USFs in distal radius fractures (DRFs) remains debated. This retrospective cohort study compared outcomes after mini-anchor fixation vs no ulnar styloid fixation in patients with DRFs and concomitant Hauck type II USFs. MATERIAL AND METHODS Forty-five patients treated between 2021 and 2023 were included. Twenty-three patients underwent mini-anchor fixation of the ulnar styloid (group A), and 22 did not (group C). Primary outcomes were USF union and ulnar-sided or DRUJ stability-related complications. Secondary outcomes included wrist range of motion, grip strength, the Modified Mayo Wrist Score, and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score. RESULTS All DRFs healed in both groups. USF union occurred in all patients in group A, whereas 2 nonunions occurred in group C (P=0.233). Ulnar-sided pain was less frequent in group A than in group C (P=0.346), and DRUJ subluxation occurred only in group C (P=0.489). Range of motion, grip strength, and functional outcome scores were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS Mini-anchor fixation was associated with higher union rates and fewer ulnar-sided or DRUJ-related complications, although differences were not statistically significant, and overall wrist function was similar between groups. Given the modest sample size, these findings should be considered preliminary and require confirmation in larger prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"32 ","pages":"e953401"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13596012/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.953401","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Hauck type II ulnar styloid fractures (USFs) occur at the base of the ulnar styloid process, where the triangular fibrocartilage complex attaches. Nonunion or disruption at this level may compromise distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) stability, although the clinical significance of associated USFs in distal radius fractures (DRFs) remains debated. This retrospective cohort study compared outcomes after mini-anchor fixation vs no ulnar styloid fixation in patients with DRFs and concomitant Hauck type II USFs. MATERIAL AND METHODS Forty-five patients treated between 2021 and 2023 were included. Twenty-three patients underwent mini-anchor fixation of the ulnar styloid (group A), and 22 did not (group C). Primary outcomes were USF union and ulnar-sided or DRUJ stability-related complications. Secondary outcomes included wrist range of motion, grip strength, the Modified Mayo Wrist Score, and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score. RESULTS All DRFs healed in both groups. USF union occurred in all patients in group A, whereas 2 nonunions occurred in group C (P=0.233). Ulnar-sided pain was less frequent in group A than in group C (P=0.346), and DRUJ subluxation occurred only in group C (P=0.489). Range of motion, grip strength, and functional outcome scores were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS Mini-anchor fixation was associated with higher union rates and fewer ulnar-sided or DRUJ-related complications, although differences were not statistically significant, and overall wrist function was similar between groups. Given the modest sample size, these findings should be considered preliminary and require confirmation in larger prospective studies.

迷你锚钉固定与保守治疗Hauck II型尺茎突骨折合并桡骨远端骨折:回顾性队列研究
Hauck II型尺骨茎突骨折(USFs)发生在尺骨茎突底部,三角纤维软骨复合体附着的地方。尽管在桡骨远端骨折(DRFs)中相关usf的临床意义仍存在争议,但这种程度的骨不连或断裂可能会损害远端尺桡关节(DRUJ)的稳定性。这项回顾性队列研究比较了DRFs合并Hauck II型usf患者进行迷你锚定固定与未进行尺骨茎突固定的结果。材料和方法纳入了45名在2021年至2023年期间接受治疗的患者。23例患者行尺茎突微型锚定固定(A组),22例未行(C组)。主要结局是USF愈合和尺侧或DRUJ稳定性相关并发症。次要结果包括手腕活动范围、握力、改良梅奥手腕评分和手臂、肩膀和手的快速残疾评分。结果两组DRFs均治愈。A组所有患者USF愈合,C组2例不愈合(P=0.233)。A组尺侧疼痛发生率低于C组(P=0.346),仅C组出现DRUJ半脱位(P=0.489)。运动范围、握力和功能评分在两组之间具有可比性。结论:Mini-anchor固定具有更高的愈合率和更少的尺侧或druj相关并发症,尽管差异无统计学意义,但两组之间的整体腕功能相似。鉴于样本量不大,这些发现应被视为初步的,需要在更大的前瞻性研究中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Science Monitor
Medical Science Monitor MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
514
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper. Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书