Implementation of Community-Based Helicobacter pylori Screening and Navigation in High-Risk Immigrant Communities.

IF 1.5 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Chul S Hyun, Ala Roh, You Jeong Lee, Sara Soonsik Kim
{"title":"Implementation of Community-Based <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> Screening and Navigation in High-Risk Immigrant Communities.","authors":"Chul S Hyun, Ala Roh, You Jeong Lee, Sara Soonsik Kim","doi":"10.1177/15248399261484613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gastric cancer remains a major prevention gap in the United States, disproportionately affecting immigrants from high-incidence regions. Although <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> is the leading modifiable risk factor for non-cardia gastric cancer, systematic and equitable pathways for testing, treatment, and eradication confirmation are lacking, and evidence on downstream implementation outside hospital settings remains limited. These findings suggest that community-based <i>H. pylori</i> screening paired with sustained navigation is feasible, and that the principal losses in gastric cancer prevention occur downstream rather than at risk identification or therapeutic efficacy. Approaches that explicitly address multistep, time-lagged care delivery are essential for translating <i>H. pylori</i> eradication into population-level gastric cancer prevention in high-risk immigrant communities. We conducted a pragmatic, descriptive implementation evaluation of a culturally and linguistically tailored, community-anchored <i>H. pylori</i> screening and navigation program, with outcomes assessed over a 6-month follow-up period in partnership with community and faith-based organizations serving Korean American populations. The workflow included multilingual outreach, a brief survey, on-site urea breath testing, privacy-protective result disclosure, and active navigation to support clinical evaluation, treatment completion, and post-treatment assessment. Among 323 participants screened, 58 (18.0%) had active <i>H. pylori</i> infection, and all (100%) were successfully contacted for confidential result disclosure. Within 6 months, 31 (53.4%) completed clinical evaluation, 15 (25.9%) completed eradication therapy, and nine (15.5%) completed post-treatment retesting; eradication was confirmed in eight of nine retested participants (88.9%). Attrition occurred across the care cascade and primarily reflected structural and logistical barriers rather than treatment failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":47956,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Practice","volume":" ","pages":"15248399261484613"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399261484613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gastric cancer remains a major prevention gap in the United States, disproportionately affecting immigrants from high-incidence regions. Although Helicobacter pylori is the leading modifiable risk factor for non-cardia gastric cancer, systematic and equitable pathways for testing, treatment, and eradication confirmation are lacking, and evidence on downstream implementation outside hospital settings remains limited. These findings suggest that community-based H. pylori screening paired with sustained navigation is feasible, and that the principal losses in gastric cancer prevention occur downstream rather than at risk identification or therapeutic efficacy. Approaches that explicitly address multistep, time-lagged care delivery are essential for translating H. pylori eradication into population-level gastric cancer prevention in high-risk immigrant communities. We conducted a pragmatic, descriptive implementation evaluation of a culturally and linguistically tailored, community-anchored H. pylori screening and navigation program, with outcomes assessed over a 6-month follow-up period in partnership with community and faith-based organizations serving Korean American populations. The workflow included multilingual outreach, a brief survey, on-site urea breath testing, privacy-protective result disclosure, and active navigation to support clinical evaluation, treatment completion, and post-treatment assessment. Among 323 participants screened, 58 (18.0%) had active H. pylori infection, and all (100%) were successfully contacted for confidential result disclosure. Within 6 months, 31 (53.4%) completed clinical evaluation, 15 (25.9%) completed eradication therapy, and nine (15.5%) completed post-treatment retesting; eradication was confirmed in eight of nine retested participants (88.9%). Attrition occurred across the care cascade and primarily reflected structural and logistical barriers rather than treatment failure.

在高危移民社区开展以社区为基础的幽门螺杆菌筛查和导航。
胃癌在美国仍然是一个主要的预防缺口,不成比例地影响着来自高发病率地区的移民。尽管幽门螺杆菌是导致非贲门性胃癌的主要可改变危险因素,但缺乏系统和公平的检测、治疗和根除途径,而且在医院外下游实施的证据仍然有限。这些发现表明,以社区为基础的幽门螺杆菌筛查与持续导航相结合是可行的,并且胃癌预防的主要损失发生在下游,而不是风险识别或治疗效果。明确解决多步骤、滞后的护理提供的方法对于将幽门螺杆菌根除转化为高危移民社区人群水平的胃癌预防至关重要。我们对一项根据文化和语言量身定制的、以社区为基础的幽门螺杆菌筛查和导航项目进行了务实、描述性的实施评估,并与为韩裔美国人服务的社区和信仰组织合作,在6个月的随访期间对结果进行了评估。工作流程包括多语言外展、简短调查、现场尿素呼气测试、隐私保护结果披露,以及支持临床评估、治疗完成和治疗后评估的主动导航。在筛选的323名参与者中,58名(18.0%)患有活动性幽门螺杆菌感染,并且所有(100%)都成功联系以保密结果披露。6个月内完成临床评估31例(53.4%),完成根除治疗15例(25.9%),完成治疗后复检9例(15.5%);9名重新测试的参与者中有8名(88.9%)被确认根除。减员发生在整个护理级联,主要反映了结构和后勤障碍,而不是治疗失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion Practice
Health Promotion Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: Health Promotion Practice (HPP) publishes authoritative articles devoted to the practical application of health promotion and education. It publishes information of strategic importance to a broad base of professionals engaged in the practice of developing, implementing, and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention programs. The journal"s editorial board is committed to focusing on the applications of health promotion and public health education interventions, programs and best practice strategies in various settings, including but not limited to, community, health care, worksite, educational, and international settings. Additionally, the journal focuses on the development and application of public policy conducive to the promotion of health and prevention of disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书