When diversity fails to engage: An investigation into the attitudinal, behavioural and physiological correlates of intercultural apathy

IF 3.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Kim Dierckx, Alain Van Hiel, Barbara Valcke, Thomas Boularbah, Hilde Depauw, Dries H. Bostyn, Jasper Van Assche
{"title":"When diversity fails to engage: An investigation into the attitudinal, behavioural and physiological correlates of intercultural apathy","authors":"Kim Dierckx,&nbsp;Alain Van Hiel,&nbsp;Barbara Valcke,&nbsp;Thomas Boularbah,&nbsp;Hilde Depauw,&nbsp;Dries H. Bostyn,&nbsp;Jasper Van Assche","doi":"10.1111/bjso.70132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite the rapid ethnic-cultural diversification of present-day societies, research shows that in everyday life, interethnic intergroup encounters are rather scarce. In the present contribution, we considered the concept of intercultural apathy to help explain why increased societal diversity does not necessarily go hand-in-hand with a rise in interethnic mixing. Intercultural apathy was defined as a cognitive, motivational and affective detachment from ethnic outgroups, both at the personal level and at the broader level of society. In four studies (total <i>N</i> = 879), we investigated the role of intercultural apathy in self-reports of intergroup contact (avoidance). Specifically, in survey Studies 1a-1b-2, we showed that interindividual differences in intercultural apathy are associated with lower frequencies of self-reported intergroup contact and stronger contact avoidance and segregation preferences. Importantly, these associations persisted after controlling for general apathy and prejudice, and they emerged among majorities <i>and</i> minorities. Furthermore, in experimental Study 3, we examined physiological intercultural apathy correlates. Our Bayesian results revealed preliminary evidence that intercultural apathy is related to lower physiological engagement (reduced heartrate variability) in response to outgroup – but not ingroup – stimuli in pain. Taken together, our results highlight that intercultural apathy may be germane to our understanding of 21st–century intergroup relations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48304,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"65 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjso.70132","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the rapid ethnic-cultural diversification of present-day societies, research shows that in everyday life, interethnic intergroup encounters are rather scarce. In the present contribution, we considered the concept of intercultural apathy to help explain why increased societal diversity does not necessarily go hand-in-hand with a rise in interethnic mixing. Intercultural apathy was defined as a cognitive, motivational and affective detachment from ethnic outgroups, both at the personal level and at the broader level of society. In four studies (total N = 879), we investigated the role of intercultural apathy in self-reports of intergroup contact (avoidance). Specifically, in survey Studies 1a-1b-2, we showed that interindividual differences in intercultural apathy are associated with lower frequencies of self-reported intergroup contact and stronger contact avoidance and segregation preferences. Importantly, these associations persisted after controlling for general apathy and prejudice, and they emerged among majorities and minorities. Furthermore, in experimental Study 3, we examined physiological intercultural apathy correlates. Our Bayesian results revealed preliminary evidence that intercultural apathy is related to lower physiological engagement (reduced heartrate variability) in response to outgroup – but not ingroup – stimuli in pain. Taken together, our results highlight that intercultural apathy may be germane to our understanding of 21st–century intergroup relations.

当多样性无法参与:对跨文化冷漠的态度、行为和生理相关因素的调查。
尽管当今社会的种族文化迅速多样化,但研究表明,在日常生活中,族群间的接触相当少。在目前的贡献中,我们考虑了跨文化冷漠的概念,以帮助解释为什么社会多样性的增加不一定与种族混合的增加密切相关。跨文化冷漠被定义为在个人层面和更广泛的社会层面上,从种族外群体的认知、动机和情感上的脱离。在四项研究中(总N = 879),我们调查了跨文化冷漠在群体间接触(回避)自我报告中的作用。具体而言,在调查研究1a-1b-2中,我们发现跨文化冷漠的个体间差异与自我报告的群体间接触频率较低、接触回避和隔离偏好较强有关。重要的是,在控制了普遍的冷漠和偏见之后,这些联系仍然存在,并且在多数人和少数人中都出现了。此外,在实验研究3中,我们研究了生理上的跨文化冷漠的相关性。我们的贝叶斯结果揭示了初步证据,表明跨文化冷漠与对疼痛的外群体刺激(而非内群体刺激)反应时较低的生理参与(心率变异性降低)有关。综上所述,我们的研究结果强调,跨文化冷漠可能与我们对21世纪群体间关系的理解密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Social Psychology publishes work from scholars based in all parts of the world, and manuscripts that present data on a wide range of populations inside and outside the UK. It publishes original papers in all areas of social psychology including: • social cognition • attitudes • group processes • social influence • intergroup relations • self and identity • nonverbal communication • social psychological aspects of personality, affect and emotion • language and discourse Submissions addressing these topics from a variety of approaches and methods, both quantitative and qualitative are welcomed. We publish papers of the following kinds: • empirical papers that address theoretical issues; • theoretical papers, including analyses of existing social psychological theories and presentations of theoretical innovations, extensions, or integrations; • review papers that provide an evaluation of work within a given area of social psychology and that present proposals for further research in that area; • methodological papers concerning issues that are particularly relevant to a wide range of social psychologists; • an invited agenda article as the first article in the first part of every volume. The editorial team aims to handle papers as efficiently as possible. In 2016, papers were triaged within less than a week, and the average turnaround time from receipt of the manuscript to first decision sent back to the authors was 47 days.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书