{"title":"Examination of the relationship between perceived fatigue and occupational balance among individuals with stroke.","authors":"M Rohat Yazici, Çigdem Çekmece","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2026.2734318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fatigue is a common and debilitating consequence of stroke that may negatively affect occupational balance, a key component of meaningful engagement in daily life and well-being. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 192 individuals with stroke recruited from Kocaeli University Hospital. Participants completed the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the Turkish version of the Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ11-T). Spearman and Pearson correlation analyses were performed, followed by multiple linear regression. The primary Spearman analysis showed a weak and non-significant association between fatigue severity and occupational balance (ρ = -.064, p = .376), whereas the complementary Pearson analysis indicated a weak but statistically significant negative association (r = -.24, p < .001). The regression model was not statistically significant and accounted for only a small proportion of the variance in occupational balance (R<sup>2</sup> = .018, p = .766). Overall, the evidence for an association between fatigue and occupational balance was limited and inconsistent across analytical approaches. These findings highlight the importance of considering occupational balance as a multidimensional outcome and support further investigation of psychosocial and contextual factors in stroke rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2026.2734318","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Fatigue is a common and debilitating consequence of stroke that may negatively affect occupational balance, a key component of meaningful engagement in daily life and well-being. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 192 individuals with stroke recruited from Kocaeli University Hospital. Participants completed the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the Turkish version of the Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ11-T). Spearman and Pearson correlation analyses were performed, followed by multiple linear regression. The primary Spearman analysis showed a weak and non-significant association between fatigue severity and occupational balance (ρ = -.064, p = .376), whereas the complementary Pearson analysis indicated a weak but statistically significant negative association (r = -.24, p < .001). The regression model was not statistically significant and accounted for only a small proportion of the variance in occupational balance (R2 = .018, p = .766). Overall, the evidence for an association between fatigue and occupational balance was limited and inconsistent across analytical approaches. These findings highlight the importance of considering occupational balance as a multidimensional outcome and support further investigation of psychosocial and contextual factors in stroke rehabilitation.
期刊介绍:
pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.