Prognostic factors in the selection of antivirals for COVID-19 in high-risk outpatients: A retrospective cohort study.

IF 3.8 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease Pub Date : 2026-09-14 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20499361261473780
Puttirat Bunditwongpaisan, Natthakit Chavapradit
{"title":"Prognostic factors in the selection of antivirals for COVID-19 in high-risk outpatients: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Puttirat Bunditwongpaisan, Natthakit Chavapradit","doi":"10.1177/20499361261473780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early oral antiviral treatment reduced disease progression and hospitalisation in high-risk COVID-19 outpatients. In practice, prescribing decisions were influenced by clinical risk, drug interaction concerns, and physician judgment, even in settings where guidelines prioritised nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. This study aimed to identify the patient characteristics that independently predicted oral antiviral selection.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify (1) independent predictors of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir versus molnupiravir prescribing, and (2) predictors of receiving any potent antiviral versus no potent antiviral, among high-risk COVID-19 outpatients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital in Bangkok, Thailand, this retrospective cohort study enrolled 450 COVID-19 outpatients between April 2022 and June 2023. Participants were randomly selected into three treatment groups of 150 each: nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, molnupiravir, and no antiviral. Multivariate logistic regression was applied to identify independent predictors of drug selection across demographics, comorbidities, and concomitant medications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treated patients were older than those who received no antiviral, with mean ages of 61.68 and 62.91 years in the nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir groups versus 43.89 years in the no-treatment cohort (p < 0.001). Comorbid disease was more prevalent in both antiviral groups. When nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir recipients were compared directly, concurrent statin use was the only variable that independently predicted a lower probability of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir being chosen (adjusted OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.79; p = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Older patients and those carrying a greater comorbidity burden were prioritised for antiviral treatment in this Thai outpatient cohort. Drug-drug interaction concerns, particularly between ritonavir and statins, drove physicians toward molnupiravir even when nirmatrelvir/ritonavir would otherwise have been the preferred agent. Systematic incorporation of pharmacist-conducted medication assessment before antiviral prescribing represents a practicable strategy for reducing avoidable drug substitution in high-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":46154,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease","volume":"13 ","pages":"20499361261473780"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13583282/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20499361261473780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early oral antiviral treatment reduced disease progression and hospitalisation in high-risk COVID-19 outpatients. In practice, prescribing decisions were influenced by clinical risk, drug interaction concerns, and physician judgment, even in settings where guidelines prioritised nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. This study aimed to identify the patient characteristics that independently predicted oral antiviral selection.

Objectives: To identify (1) independent predictors of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir versus molnupiravir prescribing, and (2) predictors of receiving any potent antiviral versus no potent antiviral, among high-risk COVID-19 outpatients.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Methods: Using data from Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital in Bangkok, Thailand, this retrospective cohort study enrolled 450 COVID-19 outpatients between April 2022 and June 2023. Participants were randomly selected into three treatment groups of 150 each: nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, molnupiravir, and no antiviral. Multivariate logistic regression was applied to identify independent predictors of drug selection across demographics, comorbidities, and concomitant medications.

Results: Treated patients were older than those who received no antiviral, with mean ages of 61.68 and 62.91 years in the nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir groups versus 43.89 years in the no-treatment cohort (p < 0.001). Comorbid disease was more prevalent in both antiviral groups. When nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir recipients were compared directly, concurrent statin use was the only variable that independently predicted a lower probability of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir being chosen (adjusted OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.79; p = 0.005).

Conclusion: Older patients and those carrying a greater comorbidity burden were prioritised for antiviral treatment in this Thai outpatient cohort. Drug-drug interaction concerns, particularly between ritonavir and statins, drove physicians toward molnupiravir even when nirmatrelvir/ritonavir would otherwise have been the preferred agent. Systematic incorporation of pharmacist-conducted medication assessment before antiviral prescribing represents a practicable strategy for reducing avoidable drug substitution in high-risk patients.

高危门诊患者COVID-19抗病毒药物选择的预后因素:一项回顾性队列研究
背景:早期口服抗病毒药物治疗可降低COVID-19高危门诊患者的疾病进展和住院率。在实践中,处方决定受到临床风险、药物相互作用问题和医生判断的影响,即使在指南优先考虑尼马特利韦/利托那韦的情况下也是如此。本研究旨在确定独立预测口服抗病毒药物选择的患者特征。目的:确定(1)在高危COVID-19门诊患者中,尼马特利韦/利托那韦与莫努比拉韦处方的独立预测因素,以及(2)接受任何有效抗病毒药物与未接受任何有效抗病毒药物的预测因素。设计:回顾性队列研究。方法:利用泰国曼谷普密蓬阿杜德医院的数据,本回顾性队列研究在2022年4月至2023年6月期间招募了450名COVID-19门诊患者。参与者被随机分为三个治疗组,每组150人:尼马特利韦/利托那韦、莫努匹拉韦和无抗病毒药物。应用多元逻辑回归来确定药物选择的独立预测因素,包括人口统计学、合并症和伴随用药。结果:接受治疗的患者比未接受抗病毒治疗的患者年龄大,尼马特利韦/利托那韦组和莫努匹拉韦组的平均年龄分别为61.68岁和62.91岁,而未接受治疗的患者平均年龄为43.89岁(p < 0.001)。在两个抗病毒组中,合并症更为普遍。当直接比较尼马特利韦/利托那韦和莫努匹拉韦受体时,同时使用他汀类药物是唯一独立预测选择尼马特利韦/利托那韦可能性较低的变量(调整OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.27至0.79;p = 0.005)。结论:在这个泰国门诊队列中,老年患者和那些携带更大合并症负担的患者优先接受抗病毒治疗。药物-药物相互作用的担忧,特别是利托那韦和他汀类药物之间的相互作用,促使医生选择莫诺匹拉韦,即使在非马特利韦/利托那韦本应是首选药物的情况下。在开抗病毒药物处方前,系统地结合药剂师进行的药物评估,是减少高危患者可避免的药物替代的可行策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
64
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书