Evaluation of optical coherence tomography findings according to treatment response in patients with amblyopia.

IF 1.1 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-09-29 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_330_24
Pinar Orenc, Utku Demir, Saliha E Sonmezay, Hulya Gungel
{"title":"Evaluation of optical coherence tomography findings according to treatment response in patients with amblyopia.","authors":"Pinar Orenc, Utku Demir, Saliha E Sonmezay, Hulya Gungel","doi":"10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_330_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate whether there is a difference in optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters between patients who respond to treatment for amblyopia, patients who do not respond to treatment, and children who do not have amblyopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children were divided into three groups: those with full visual acuity after amblyopia treatment, Group 1; those without complete visual acuity, Group 2; and those without amblyopia, Group 3. Macular thickness (MT), retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), ganglion cell complex (GCC), and choroidal vascular index (CVI) parameters were measured by OCT and compared among the three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 110 eyes of 55 patients with amblyopia and 37 eyes of 37 healthy children were included in the study. There was no difference between the three groups in the mean central MT, RNFL, GCC, and CVI. A difference in macular inner temporal value was detected between Group 1 and 2 amblyopic eyes and the control group. There was a statistically significant difference between the 3 groups in the RNFL Superior and RNFL SN. However, there was no statistically significant difference between Group 1 and Group 2 in the 9-region MT or 12-region RNFL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although there was a difference in the macular inner temporal, RNFL SUP, and RNFL SN parameters when the control group and children who received amblyopia treatment were compared, there was no difference in OCT parameters in treatment responder and nonresponder children after amblyopia treatment. OCT parameters do not provide additional information about the response to treatment for amblyopia.</p>","PeriodicalId":46810,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"40 3","pages":"286-292"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13585349/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_330_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate whether there is a difference in optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters between patients who respond to treatment for amblyopia, patients who do not respond to treatment, and children who do not have amblyopia.

Methods: Children were divided into three groups: those with full visual acuity after amblyopia treatment, Group 1; those without complete visual acuity, Group 2; and those without amblyopia, Group 3. Macular thickness (MT), retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), ganglion cell complex (GCC), and choroidal vascular index (CVI) parameters were measured by OCT and compared among the three groups.

Results: A total of 110 eyes of 55 patients with amblyopia and 37 eyes of 37 healthy children were included in the study. There was no difference between the three groups in the mean central MT, RNFL, GCC, and CVI. A difference in macular inner temporal value was detected between Group 1 and 2 amblyopic eyes and the control group. There was a statistically significant difference between the 3 groups in the RNFL Superior and RNFL SN. However, there was no statistically significant difference between Group 1 and Group 2 in the 9-region MT or 12-region RNFL.

Conclusion: Although there was a difference in the macular inner temporal, RNFL SUP, and RNFL SN parameters when the control group and children who received amblyopia treatment were compared, there was no difference in OCT parameters in treatment responder and nonresponder children after amblyopia treatment. OCT parameters do not provide additional information about the response to treatment for amblyopia.

根据治疗反应评价弱视患者的光学相干断层扫描结果。
目的:探讨对弱视治疗有反应的患者、治疗无反应的患者和无弱视的儿童在光学相干断层扫描(OCT)参数上是否存在差异。方法:将儿童分为三组:弱视治疗后视力恢复正常者为第一组;无完全视力者,第2组;无弱视者,第三组。用OCT测量各组黄斑厚度(MT)、视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)、神经节细胞复合体(GCC)、脉络膜血管指数(CVI)参数,并进行比较。结果:55例弱视患者共110只眼,37例健康儿童共37只眼纳入研究。三组间的平均中央MT、RNFL、GCC和CVI均无差异。1、2组弱视眼与对照组黄斑内颞值有差异。RNFL Superior和RNFL SN三组间比较,差异均有统计学意义。然而,组1和组2在9区MT和12区RNFL上无统计学差异。结论:虽然对照组与接受弱视治疗的儿童在黄斑内颞区、RNFL SUP、RNFL SN参数上存在差异,但弱视治疗后治疗有反应的儿童与无反应的儿童在OCT参数上无差异。OCT参数不能提供对弱视治疗反应的额外信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology is an English language, peer-reviewed scholarly publication in the area of ophthalmology. Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology publishes original papers, clinical studies, reviews and case reports. Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology is the official publication of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society and is published by King Saud University in collaboration with Elsevier and is edited by an international group of eminent researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书