Undergraduate point-of-care ultrasound education in Northern Europe: A cross-sectional survey.

IF 3.6 Q2 Medicine
Jesse Järvinen, Kalle Mattila, Ossi Hannula, Anna Meuronen
{"title":"Undergraduate point-of-care ultrasound education in Northern Europe: A cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Jesse Järvinen, Kalle Mattila, Ossi Hannula, Anna Meuronen","doi":"10.5826/tuj.2026.18814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly recognized as a vital physician skill in acute care, yet its integration into undergraduate medical curricula in Europe remains inconsistent. This study aimed to assess the status of undergraduate POCUS education in Northern Europe and identify structural factors influencing its implementation. Methods A cross-sectional, web-based survey was distributed to accredited medical schools across the Nordic and Baltic countries. Faculty leads responsible for Emergency Medicine, Critical Care/Anesthesiology, or POCUS education were surveyed. The survey assessed curriculum integration, governance structures, resource barriers, and educator attitudes. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative responses regarding implementation barriers underwent thematic analysis. Results Twenty-two institutions participated, yielding an 88% response rate. Established POCUS curricula were reported by 45% of schools, though integration levels varied between the Nordic and Baltic regions. Governance was frequently shared between Emergency Medicine and Radiology. Primary barriers were \"curriculum overcrowding\" (73%) and \"fragmented governance\" (68%). Notably, \"faculty shortage\" (64%) was cited more frequently than equipment limitations. Educator attitudes were universally positive; however, respondents from institutions without an established curriculum expressed a stronger need for standardized guidelines compared to those with active programs. Conclusions Undergraduate POCUS education in Northern Europe is expanding but remains limited by existing curricula and fragmented governance. Instructional capacity surpasses equipment availability as the main resource bottleneck. We suggest future efforts may benefit from a simplified European \"POCUS Core\" framework to steer early-stage implementation, alongside a strategic shift toward faculty development to ensure sustainable supervision.</p>","PeriodicalId":36911,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Journal","volume":"18 1","pages":"18814"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5826/tuj.2026.18814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly recognized as a vital physician skill in acute care, yet its integration into undergraduate medical curricula in Europe remains inconsistent. This study aimed to assess the status of undergraduate POCUS education in Northern Europe and identify structural factors influencing its implementation. Methods A cross-sectional, web-based survey was distributed to accredited medical schools across the Nordic and Baltic countries. Faculty leads responsible for Emergency Medicine, Critical Care/Anesthesiology, or POCUS education were surveyed. The survey assessed curriculum integration, governance structures, resource barriers, and educator attitudes. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative responses regarding implementation barriers underwent thematic analysis. Results Twenty-two institutions participated, yielding an 88% response rate. Established POCUS curricula were reported by 45% of schools, though integration levels varied between the Nordic and Baltic regions. Governance was frequently shared between Emergency Medicine and Radiology. Primary barriers were "curriculum overcrowding" (73%) and "fragmented governance" (68%). Notably, "faculty shortage" (64%) was cited more frequently than equipment limitations. Educator attitudes were universally positive; however, respondents from institutions without an established curriculum expressed a stronger need for standardized guidelines compared to those with active programs. Conclusions Undergraduate POCUS education in Northern Europe is expanding but remains limited by existing curricula and fragmented governance. Instructional capacity surpasses equipment availability as the main resource bottleneck. We suggest future efforts may benefit from a simplified European "POCUS Core" framework to steer early-stage implementation, alongside a strategic shift toward faculty development to ensure sustainable supervision.

北欧本科点护理超声教育:一项横断面调查。
医疗点超声(POCUS)越来越被认为是急症护理的一项重要医师技能,但在欧洲,将其纳入本科医学课程仍不一致。本研究旨在评估北欧大学本科POCUS教育的现状,并找出影响其实施的结构性因素。方法对北欧和波罗的海国家认可的医学院进行基于网络的横断面调查。负责急诊医学、重症监护/麻醉学或POCUS教育的教师领导接受了调查。调查评估了课程整合、管理结构、资源障碍和教育者的态度。定量数据采用描述性统计进行分析,而关于实施障碍的定性答复则采用专题分析。结果22家机构参与调查,回复率88%。45%的学校建立了POCUS课程,尽管北欧和波罗的海地区的整合水平有所不同。急诊医学和放射学之间经常共享管理。主要的障碍是“课程过度拥挤”(73%)和“分散的管理”(68%)。值得注意的是,“师资短缺”(64%)被提及的频率高于设备限制。教育者的态度普遍是积极的;然而,来自没有既定课程的机构的受访者表示,与那些有积极课程的机构相比,更需要标准化的指导方针。结论:北欧的本科POCUS教育正在扩大,但仍然受到现有课程和分散管理的限制。教学能力超过设备可用性成为主要的资源瓶颈。我们建议未来的努力可以从简化的欧洲“POCUS核心”框架中受益,以指导早期实施,同时向教师发展的战略转变,以确保可持续的监督。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultrasound Journal
Ultrasound Journal Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
45
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书