Dynamic simulation and digital twins in atrial fibrillation: Complementary roles and current limitations.

Q3 Medicine
Samer G Salman, Isha Tripuraneni, Sai Madhav Yedupati, Zane G Salman, Ryan T Zeitouny, Ajay Tripuraneni
{"title":"Dynamic simulation and digital twins in atrial fibrillation: Complementary roles and current limitations.","authors":"Samer G Salman, Isha Tripuraneni, Sai Madhav Yedupati, Zane G Salman, Ryan T Zeitouny, Ajay Tripuraneni","doi":"10.1016/j.ipej.2026.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Atrial fibrillation (AF) management relies on established risk scores, with CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc supporting thromboembolic risk assessment and HAS-BLED identifying modifiable bleeding risks rather than determining anticoagulation eligibility. Although widely validated and guideline-endorsed, these population-based models provide limited personalization and do not capture temporal dynamics, patient heterogeneity, or evolving disease trajectories. Advances in artificial intelligence, machine learning, dynamic simulation, and digital twin methodologies may enable more individualized and temporally adaptive decision-making. This narrative review evaluates the emerging role of dynamic simulation and digital twins in AF care, focusing on their potential to complement established frameworks, the evidence supporting their use, and barriers to clinical implementation. Current applications remain largely limited to feasibility studies, mechanistic modeling, and procedural use cases such as patient-specific ablation planning. Machine learning models may modestly improve prediction over traditional risk scores but are generally static or only episodically updated. Fully adaptive digital twins capable of recurrent updating and individualized clinical guidance have not been validated in routine practice, and reported gains primarily reflect predictive accuracy or simulation fidelity rather than improved patient outcomes. Major barriers include fragmented data ecosystems, limited longitudinal multimodal datasets, lack of prospective validation, unresolved regulatory and ethical issues, limited interpretability, clinician trust, and workflow integration. Digital twins and dynamic simulation should therefore be viewed as complementary rather than replacement tools: machine learning may refine risk estimation, mechanistic simulation may support procedural planning and investigation, and adaptive digital twins remain investigational without an established clinical role in AF.</p>","PeriodicalId":35900,"journal":{"name":"Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2026.09.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) management relies on established risk scores, with CHA2DS2-VASc supporting thromboembolic risk assessment and HAS-BLED identifying modifiable bleeding risks rather than determining anticoagulation eligibility. Although widely validated and guideline-endorsed, these population-based models provide limited personalization and do not capture temporal dynamics, patient heterogeneity, or evolving disease trajectories. Advances in artificial intelligence, machine learning, dynamic simulation, and digital twin methodologies may enable more individualized and temporally adaptive decision-making. This narrative review evaluates the emerging role of dynamic simulation and digital twins in AF care, focusing on their potential to complement established frameworks, the evidence supporting their use, and barriers to clinical implementation. Current applications remain largely limited to feasibility studies, mechanistic modeling, and procedural use cases such as patient-specific ablation planning. Machine learning models may modestly improve prediction over traditional risk scores but are generally static or only episodically updated. Fully adaptive digital twins capable of recurrent updating and individualized clinical guidance have not been validated in routine practice, and reported gains primarily reflect predictive accuracy or simulation fidelity rather than improved patient outcomes. Major barriers include fragmented data ecosystems, limited longitudinal multimodal datasets, lack of prospective validation, unresolved regulatory and ethical issues, limited interpretability, clinician trust, and workflow integration. Digital twins and dynamic simulation should therefore be viewed as complementary rather than replacement tools: machine learning may refine risk estimation, mechanistic simulation may support procedural planning and investigation, and adaptive digital twins remain investigational without an established clinical role in AF.

房颤的动态模拟和数字双胞胎:互补的作用和当前的局限性。
房颤(AF)的管理依赖于已建立的风险评分,CHA2DS2-VASc支持血栓栓塞风险评估,HAS-BLED识别可修改的出血风险,而不是确定抗凝资格。尽管得到了广泛的验证和指南的认可,但这些基于人群的模型提供了有限的个性化,不能捕捉时间动态、患者异质性或不断发展的疾病轨迹。人工智能、机器学习、动态模拟和数字孪生方法的进步可能会使决策更加个性化和具有时间适应性。这篇叙述性综述评估了动态模拟和数字双胞胎在房颤治疗中的新兴作用,重点关注它们补充现有框架的潜力、支持其使用的证据以及临床实施的障碍。目前的应用仍然主要局限于可行性研究、机制建模和程序性用例,如患者特异性消融计划。机器学习模型可能会适度提高传统风险评分的预测能力,但通常是静态的,或者只是偶尔更新。能够反复更新和个性化临床指导的完全自适应数字双胞胎尚未在常规实践中得到验证,报告的收益主要反映了预测的准确性或模拟的保真度,而不是患者预后的改善。主要障碍包括支离破碎的数据生态系统、有限的纵向多模态数据集、缺乏前瞻性验证、未解决的监管和伦理问题、有限的可解释性、临床医生信任和工作流程集成。因此,数字双胞胎和动态模拟应该被视为互补而不是替代工具:机器学习可以改进风险估计,机械模拟可以支持程序计划和调查,适应性数字双胞胎在房颤中没有确定的临床作用,仍然处于研究阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal is a peer reviewed online journal devoted to cardiac pacing and electrophysiology. Editorial Advisory Board includes eminent personalities in the field of cardiac pacing and electrophysiology from Asia, Australia, Europe and North America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书