Trust and respect declines and recoveries in psychotherapy: Clinical impact of relational feedback.

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychotherapy Pub Date : 2026-09-17 DOI:10.1037/pst0000641
Mary Beth Connolly Gibbons, Nic Kodkany, Yaz Liow, Paul Crits-Christoph
{"title":"Trust and respect declines and recoveries in psychotherapy: Clinical impact of relational feedback.","authors":"Mary Beth Connolly Gibbons, Nic Kodkany, Yaz Liow, Paul Crits-Christoph","doi":"10.1037/pst0000641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measurement-based care, also referred to as routine outcome monitoring, has demonstrated modest benefits for psychotherapy outcomes, yet less is known about how feedback on specific relational processes may influence clinical course. The present study examined whether fluctuations in patient-reported trust and respect toward the therapist-conceptualized here as meaningful declines and subsequent recoveries in trust/respect, rather than direct measures of alliance ruptures and repairs-are associated with changes in functioning and whether providing therapists with feedback on these ratings alters these associations. Adult patients receiving treatment in U.S. community mental health settings were randomized for their therapist to receive symptom feedback alone or symptom plus trust/respect feedback. Meaningful declines in trust/respect were defined as within-patient decreases exceeding typical variability, and recoveries were defined as subsequent returns to predecline levels. Weekly functioning was assessed over 11 weeks using time-varying mixed-effects models. Of 233 randomized patients, 185 completed at least one postbaseline assessment, and 162 had postbaseline data sufficient for the current decline/recovery analyses. Meaningful declines in trust/respect across sessions that did not recover to previous levels were associated with lower within-person functioning in the symptom-only feedback condition but was attenuated in the trust/respect feedback condition. Recovery status was not differentially associated with functioning across conditions. These findings suggest that monitoring and providing feedback on patient perceptions of trust and respect may mitigate the impact of unresolved relational strain. Incorporating specific relational process indicators into measurement-based care/routine outcome monitoring may enhance its clinical utility. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000641","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measurement-based care, also referred to as routine outcome monitoring, has demonstrated modest benefits for psychotherapy outcomes, yet less is known about how feedback on specific relational processes may influence clinical course. The present study examined whether fluctuations in patient-reported trust and respect toward the therapist-conceptualized here as meaningful declines and subsequent recoveries in trust/respect, rather than direct measures of alliance ruptures and repairs-are associated with changes in functioning and whether providing therapists with feedback on these ratings alters these associations. Adult patients receiving treatment in U.S. community mental health settings were randomized for their therapist to receive symptom feedback alone or symptom plus trust/respect feedback. Meaningful declines in trust/respect were defined as within-patient decreases exceeding typical variability, and recoveries were defined as subsequent returns to predecline levels. Weekly functioning was assessed over 11 weeks using time-varying mixed-effects models. Of 233 randomized patients, 185 completed at least one postbaseline assessment, and 162 had postbaseline data sufficient for the current decline/recovery analyses. Meaningful declines in trust/respect across sessions that did not recover to previous levels were associated with lower within-person functioning in the symptom-only feedback condition but was attenuated in the trust/respect feedback condition. Recovery status was not differentially associated with functioning across conditions. These findings suggest that monitoring and providing feedback on patient perceptions of trust and respect may mitigate the impact of unresolved relational strain. Incorporating specific relational process indicators into measurement-based care/routine outcome monitoring may enhance its clinical utility. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

心理治疗中信任与尊重的下降与恢复:关系反馈的临床影响。
以测量为基础的护理,也被称为常规结果监测,已证明对心理治疗结果有一定的好处,但对特定关系过程的反馈如何影响临床过程的了解较少。本研究考察了患者报告的对治疗师的信任和尊重的波动是否与功能的变化有关,以及向治疗师提供这些评级的反馈是否改变了这些联系。在这里,信任/尊重的波动被定义为有意义的下降和随后的恢复,而不是联盟破裂和修复的直接衡量标准。在美国社区心理健康机构接受治疗的成年患者被随机分配给他们的治疗师单独接受症状反馈或症状加信任/尊重反馈。信任/尊重的有意义的下降被定义为患者内部的下降超过典型的可变性,恢复被定义为随后恢复到下降前的水平。使用时变混合效应模型在11周内评估每周功能。在233名随机患者中,185名患者至少完成了一次基线后评估,162名患者的基线后数据足以进行当前的下降/恢复分析。在只有症状的反馈条件下,信任/尊重的有意义的下降没有恢复到以前的水平,这与人际功能的降低有关,但在信任/尊重的反馈条件下,这种下降有所减弱。恢复状态与不同条件下的功能无差异相关。这些发现表明,监测和提供反馈病人的信任和尊重的看法可能减轻未解决的关系紧张的影响。将特定的相关过程指标纳入基于测量的护理/常规结果监测可能会提高其临床效用。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychotherapy
Psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training publishes a wide variety of articles relevant to the field of psychotherapy. The journal strives to foster interactions among individuals involved with training, practice theory, and research since all areas are essential to psychotherapy. This journal is an invaluable resource for practicing clinical and counseling psychologists, social workers, and mental health professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书