Yuta Nakamaru, Mizuki Uno, Yiran Song, Kanako So, Tomoko Kita, Fumiyoshi Yamashita
{"title":"Federated Estimation of Population Pharmacokinetic Models with Exact Equivalence to Pooled-Data Analysis.","authors":"Yuta Nakamaru, Mizuki Uno, Yiran Song, Kanako So, Tomoko Kita, Fumiyoshi Yamashita","doi":"10.1007/s11095-026-04203-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) analysis relies on nonlinear mixed-effects modeling of pooled data; however, sharing subject-level data across sites is often restricted. This study develops a federated framework that exactly recovers the global objective function corresponding to centralized pooled-data analysis, thereby yielding identical parameter estimates without sharing subject-level data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Each site computes its local contributions to the global objective function and corresponding gradients. A central server aggregates these quantities to reconstruct the global objective function and gradient at each parameter value. Performance was evaluated using simulations of a one-compartment oral model under two multi-site scenarios: heterogeneous sparse sampling and between-site heterogeneity in covariate distribution. Federated estimation was compared with centralized pooled-data estimation, independent site-specific estimation, and weighted combination of site-specific estimates and variances. Parameter uncertainty was assessed using bootstrap resampling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across scenarios, federated estimation yielded parameter estimates and bootstrap confidence intervals that closely matched with those from centralized pooled-data estimation for fixed effects, between-subject variability, and residual error. In contrast, independent site-specific estimation showed deviations under certain conditions, and weighted pooling of site-specific estimates did not reproduce centralized variance estimates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed federated framework enables mathematically equivalent PopPK estimation without sharing subject-level data.</p>","PeriodicalId":20027,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Research","volume":" ","pages":"2957-2966"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-026-04203-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) analysis relies on nonlinear mixed-effects modeling of pooled data; however, sharing subject-level data across sites is often restricted. This study develops a federated framework that exactly recovers the global objective function corresponding to centralized pooled-data analysis, thereby yielding identical parameter estimates without sharing subject-level data.
Methods: Each site computes its local contributions to the global objective function and corresponding gradients. A central server aggregates these quantities to reconstruct the global objective function and gradient at each parameter value. Performance was evaluated using simulations of a one-compartment oral model under two multi-site scenarios: heterogeneous sparse sampling and between-site heterogeneity in covariate distribution. Federated estimation was compared with centralized pooled-data estimation, independent site-specific estimation, and weighted combination of site-specific estimates and variances. Parameter uncertainty was assessed using bootstrap resampling.
Results: Across scenarios, federated estimation yielded parameter estimates and bootstrap confidence intervals that closely matched with those from centralized pooled-data estimation for fixed effects, between-subject variability, and residual error. In contrast, independent site-specific estimation showed deviations under certain conditions, and weighted pooling of site-specific estimates did not reproduce centralized variance estimates.
Conclusions: The proposed federated framework enables mathematically equivalent PopPK estimation without sharing subject-level data.
期刊介绍:
Pharmaceutical Research, an official journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists, is committed to publishing novel research that is mechanism-based, hypothesis-driven and addresses significant issues in drug discovery, development and regulation. Current areas of interest include, but are not limited to:
-(pre)formulation engineering and processing-
computational biopharmaceutics-
drug delivery and targeting-
molecular biopharmaceutics and drug disposition (including cellular and molecular pharmacology)-
pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenetics.
Research may involve nonclinical and clinical studies, and utilize both in vitro and in vivo approaches. Studies on small drug molecules, pharmaceutical solid materials (including biomaterials, polymers and nanoparticles) biotechnology products (including genes, peptides, proteins and vaccines), and genetically engineered cells are welcome.