Evolution and Hotspots in Autologous Ear Reconstruction: A Bibliometric Analysis of the 100 Most-cited Studies.

IF 1.9 Q3 SURGERY
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2026-09-02 eCollection Date: 2026-09-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000008056
Charbel G Saad, Laurentia Fidella Averina Setia Santoso, Rola Mahdi, Soumiya Nadar, Thenuli Tamasha Jayamaha Hitihamilage, Nancy Emmanuel, Juan Pablo Menendez, Gregory Nicolas
{"title":"Evolution and Hotspots in Autologous Ear Reconstruction: A Bibliometric Analysis of the 100 Most-cited Studies.","authors":"Charbel G Saad, Laurentia Fidella Averina Setia Santoso, Rola Mahdi, Soumiya Nadar, Thenuli Tamasha Jayamaha Hitihamilage, Nancy Emmanuel, Juan Pablo Menendez, Gregory Nicolas","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000008056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Autologous auricular reconstruction has evolved from cartilage-carving techniques that established modern microtia repair to an expanding regenerative and biofabrication literature. However, the field has not been mapped bibliometrically using an autologous-only lens that separates the clinical literature from emerging tissue-engineering hotspots.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Scopus search in January 2026 identified publications on autologous auricular reconstruction. Records were sorted by citation count, screened for eligibility, and the 100 most-cited studies were included. Data extracted included citations, citations per year, year, journal, country, and evidence category. Studies were classified into 4 domains: surgical technique, tissue engineering/basic science, complications/management, and outcomes/quality of life. VOSviewer was used for coauthorship and keyword co-occurrence mapping. Temporal shifts were assessed by comparing the older versus newer halves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 100 most-cited studies (1971-2023) accrued a mean of 82.97 citations (range, 27-510) with a median of 3.46 citations per year. Most studies were clinical (71%), followed by preclinical (19%) and evidence synthesis (10%). Surgical technique predominated overall (53%), but decreased from 66% in the older half to 40% in the newer half, whereas tissue engineering increased from 16% to 28%. The most-cited article was the description by Nagata of a 2-stage, 3-dimensional costal cartilage framework (1993, <i>Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery</i>). Keyword clustering revealed a temporally newer regenerative cluster centered on chondrocytes, tissue engineering, and biomechanics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The citation canon of autologous auricular reconstruction is built on the late 20th-century technique classics, whereas contemporary influence is increasingly driven by regenerative medicine and biofabrication. Future high-impact work will likely be defined by durable, shape-stable engineered constructs validated in clinically relevant models.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"14 9","pages":"e8056"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13581356/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000008056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Autologous auricular reconstruction has evolved from cartilage-carving techniques that established modern microtia repair to an expanding regenerative and biofabrication literature. However, the field has not been mapped bibliometrically using an autologous-only lens that separates the clinical literature from emerging tissue-engineering hotspots.

Methods: A Scopus search in January 2026 identified publications on autologous auricular reconstruction. Records were sorted by citation count, screened for eligibility, and the 100 most-cited studies were included. Data extracted included citations, citations per year, year, journal, country, and evidence category. Studies were classified into 4 domains: surgical technique, tissue engineering/basic science, complications/management, and outcomes/quality of life. VOSviewer was used for coauthorship and keyword co-occurrence mapping. Temporal shifts were assessed by comparing the older versus newer halves.

Results: The 100 most-cited studies (1971-2023) accrued a mean of 82.97 citations (range, 27-510) with a median of 3.46 citations per year. Most studies were clinical (71%), followed by preclinical (19%) and evidence synthesis (10%). Surgical technique predominated overall (53%), but decreased from 66% in the older half to 40% in the newer half, whereas tissue engineering increased from 16% to 28%. The most-cited article was the description by Nagata of a 2-stage, 3-dimensional costal cartilage framework (1993, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery). Keyword clustering revealed a temporally newer regenerative cluster centered on chondrocytes, tissue engineering, and biomechanics.

Conclusions: The citation canon of autologous auricular reconstruction is built on the late 20th-century technique classics, whereas contemporary influence is increasingly driven by regenerative medicine and biofabrication. Future high-impact work will likely be defined by durable, shape-stable engineered constructs validated in clinically relevant models.

自体耳部重建的发展与热点:100篇被引文献计量学分析
背景:自体耳廓重建已经从建立现代小耳修复的软骨雕刻技术发展到不断扩大的再生和生物制造文献。然而,该领域还没有使用将临床文献与新兴组织工程热点分开的自体透镜进行文献计量学映射。方法:检索Scopus于2026年1月发表的关于自体耳廓重建的文献。记录按引用计数排序,筛选合格性,包括100个被引用最多的研究。提取的数据包括引文、每年引文、年份、期刊、国家和证据类别。研究分为4个领域:手术技术、组织工程/基础科学、并发症/处理和结果/生活质量。使用VOSviewer进行合著和关键词共现映射。时间转移是通过比较旧的和新的半脑来评估的。结果:100篇被引次数最多的研究(1971-2023)平均被引82.97次(范围27-510),中位数为每年3.46次。大多数研究是临床研究(71%),其次是临床前研究(19%)和证据合成(10%)。手术技术在总体上占主导地位(53%),但从老半部分的66%下降到新半部分的40%,而组织工程从16%上升到28%。引用最多的文章是Nagata对两阶段三维肋软骨框架的描述(1993,Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery)。关键词聚类揭示了一个以软骨细胞、组织工程和生物力学为中心的暂时更新的再生簇。结论:自体耳廓重建的引用标准建立在20世纪晚期的技术经典之上,而当代的影响越来越受到再生医学和生物制造的推动。未来的高影响力工作可能会由耐用、形状稳定的工程结构来定义,这些结构在临床相关模型中得到验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书