Cigarette Affordability and Consumption in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2010-2023: Implications for Tobacco Tax Policy.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Dragan Gligorić, Zoran Borović, Nikola Vidović, Vladana Ritan
{"title":"Cigarette Affordability and Consumption in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2010-2023: Implications for Tobacco Tax Policy.","authors":"Dragan Gligorić, Zoran Borović, Nikola Vidović, Vladana Ritan","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntag212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tobacco taxation effectively reduces cigarette consumption, but its success depends on whether price increases outpace income growth. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, rising incomes and stagnating excise taxes after 2019 have increased cigarette affordability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using quarterly data from 2010 to 2023, an error correction model estimated with instrumental variables exploiting policy-driven variation in tobacco excise taxes was applied to estimate (1) separate price and income elasticities and (2) affordability elasticity using the relative income price. The affordability-framework restriction (that price and income elasticities are equal in magnitude) was also tested, and policy simulations were conducted to estimate the tax increases needed to reduce consumption by 10%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Long-run price, income, and affordability elasticities were -0.965 ($p<0.001$), 0.752 ($p<0.001$), and -1.065 ($p<0.001$), respectively. The restriction of equal price and income effects was not rejected in the baseline model ($p=0.231$), but was rejected when controlling for a 2016 advertising ban ($p=0.019$). To achieve a 10% reduction in consumption under 1.37% annual income growth, required price increases were 11.43% (unrestricted model) versus 10.76% (affordability model), requiring specific excise tax increases of 40.83% and 33.53%, and raising excise revenues by 31.48% and 23.53%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Affordability elasticity provides a practical basis for policy, but should complement-rather than replace-unrestricted price-income models. Policymakers should implement substantial excise hikes and index tax adjustments to inflation and income growth to sustainably curb consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntag212","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tobacco taxation effectively reduces cigarette consumption, but its success depends on whether price increases outpace income growth. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, rising incomes and stagnating excise taxes after 2019 have increased cigarette affordability.

Methods: Using quarterly data from 2010 to 2023, an error correction model estimated with instrumental variables exploiting policy-driven variation in tobacco excise taxes was applied to estimate (1) separate price and income elasticities and (2) affordability elasticity using the relative income price. The affordability-framework restriction (that price and income elasticities are equal in magnitude) was also tested, and policy simulations were conducted to estimate the tax increases needed to reduce consumption by 10%.

Results: Long-run price, income, and affordability elasticities were -0.965 ($p<0.001$), 0.752 ($p<0.001$), and -1.065 ($p<0.001$), respectively. The restriction of equal price and income effects was not rejected in the baseline model ($p=0.231$), but was rejected when controlling for a 2016 advertising ban ($p=0.019$). To achieve a 10% reduction in consumption under 1.37% annual income growth, required price increases were 11.43% (unrestricted model) versus 10.76% (affordability model), requiring specific excise tax increases of 40.83% and 33.53%, and raising excise revenues by 31.48% and 23.53%.

Conclusions: Affordability elasticity provides a practical basis for policy, but should complement-rather than replace-unrestricted price-income models. Policymakers should implement substantial excise hikes and index tax adjustments to inflation and income growth to sustainably curb consumption.

2010-2023年波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的卷烟负担能力和消费:对烟草税收政策的影响。
背景:烟草税有效地减少了香烟消费,但它的成功取决于价格上涨是否超过收入增长。在波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那,2019年以后收入的增加和消费税的停滞增加了香烟的可负担性。方法:利用2010年至2023年的季度数据,采用利用政策驱动烟草消费税变化的工具变量估计的误差修正模型来估计:(1)单独的价格和收入弹性,(2)使用相对收入价格的可负担性弹性。可负担性框架限制(价格和收入弹性在大小上相等)也进行了测试,并进行了政策模拟,以估计减少消费10%所需的增税。结果:长期价格、收入和负担能力弹性为-0.965 ($p)。结论:负担能力弹性为政策提供了实践基础,但应该补充而不是取代不受限制的价格-收入模型。政策制定者应大幅提高消费税,并根据通胀和收入增长调整指标税,以可持续地抑制消费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书