Effectiveness of Active Vision Therapy in Children with Bilateral Refractive Amblyopia.

IF 1.4 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research Pub Date : 2026-07-21 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.18502/jovr.v21.18761
Saeedeh Hoseinmenni, Saeed Rahmani, Ebrahim Jafarzadehpour, Jeffrey Cooper, Mohammad Reza Talebnejad, Ali Reza Akbarzade Baghban, Haleh Kangari, Enayatollah Osroosh
{"title":"Effectiveness of Active Vision Therapy in Children with Bilateral Refractive Amblyopia.","authors":"Saeedeh Hoseinmenni, Saeed Rahmani, Ebrahim Jafarzadehpour, Jeffrey Cooper, Mohammad Reza Talebnejad, Ali Reza Akbarzade Baghban, Haleh Kangari, Enayatollah Osroosh","doi":"10.18502/jovr.v21.18761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the effectivity of vision therapy plus patching versus patching combined with placebo therapy in bilateral refractive amblyopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized controlled trial, children with bilateral refractive amblyopia were enrolled. Monocular best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ranged from 0.3 logMAR (20/40) to 0.6 logMAR (20/80) in both eyes, and visual acuity (VA) difference was less than 0.2 logMAR between the eyes. The experimental group received patching plus in-office vision therapy with Vision Therapy System 4 (VTS4), including accommodation, stereopsis, ocular movements, and visual memory skills, while the control group received patching plus in-office placebo therapy. The primary outcome measure was BCVA, and the secondary outcomes were stereo acuity, and accommodative facility measured pre- and post-therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty children aged 5 to 8 were included. After 4 months of therapy, the mean VA improvement was 0.23 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 0.08 logMAR [2.3 line] (<i>P</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001) in the experimental group and 0.09 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 0.06 logMAR [0.09 line] (<i>P</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001) in the control group. The difference in VA improvement between the two groups was statistically significant (<i>P</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.001). Post-therapy, the improvements in Randot stereoacuity and in monocular and binocular accommodative facilities were statistically significant between the experimental and the control groups (<i>P</i> = 0.013, <i>P</i> = 0.005, <i>P</i> = 0.002, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Administering vision therapy in conjunction with patching significantly improved VA, stereo acuity, and accommodation facility in bilateral refractive amblyopia compared to patching alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":16586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","volume":"21 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13583479/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v21.18761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effectivity of vision therapy plus patching versus patching combined with placebo therapy in bilateral refractive amblyopia.

Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, children with bilateral refractive amblyopia were enrolled. Monocular best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ranged from 0.3 logMAR (20/40) to 0.6 logMAR (20/80) in both eyes, and visual acuity (VA) difference was less than 0.2 logMAR between the eyes. The experimental group received patching plus in-office vision therapy with Vision Therapy System 4 (VTS4), including accommodation, stereopsis, ocular movements, and visual memory skills, while the control group received patching plus in-office placebo therapy. The primary outcome measure was BCVA, and the secondary outcomes were stereo acuity, and accommodative facility measured pre- and post-therapy.

Results: Forty children aged 5 to 8 were included. After 4 months of therapy, the mean VA improvement was 0.23 ± 0.08 logMAR [2.3 line] (P < 0.001) in the experimental group and 0.09 ± 0.06 logMAR [0.09 line] (P < 0.001) in the control group. The difference in VA improvement between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Post-therapy, the improvements in Randot stereoacuity and in monocular and binocular accommodative facilities were statistically significant between the experimental and the control groups (P = 0.013, P = 0.005, P = 0.002, respectively).

Conclusion: Administering vision therapy in conjunction with patching significantly improved VA, stereo acuity, and accommodation facility in bilateral refractive amblyopia compared to patching alone.

主动视力治疗儿童双侧屈光性弱视的疗效。
目的:比较视力治疗加补片与补片联合安慰剂治疗双侧屈光性弱视的疗效。方法:在这项随机对照试验中,入选双侧屈光性弱视儿童。双眼单眼最佳矫正视力(BCVA)范围为0.3 logMAR (20/40) ~ 0.6 logMAR(20/80),两眼视力(VA)差异小于0.2 logMAR。实验组采用视觉治疗系统4 (VTS4)进行补片加室内视觉治疗,包括调节、立体视觉、眼球运动和视觉记忆技能,对照组采用补片加室内安慰剂治疗。主要指标为BCVA,次要指标为立体视力,治疗前后调节设施测量。结果:纳入40例5 ~ 8岁儿童。治疗4个月后,实验组的平均VA改善为0.23±0.08 logMAR[2.3线](P 0.001),对照组为0.09±0.06 logMAR[0.09线](P 0.001)。两组VA改善差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。治疗后,实验组与对照组的随机立体视力、单眼和双眼调节设备的改善均有统计学意义(P = 0.013, P = 0.005, P = 0.002)。结论:与单独配片相比,视力治疗联合配片可显著改善双侧屈光性弱视的视敏度、立体视敏度和调节设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书