Effectiveness of Behavior Change Wheel-based health education for cancer pain: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of International Medical Research Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-18 DOI:10.1177/03000605261487054
Yuxuan Shi, Wenjuan Li, Rong Tang, Huan Wang, Qi Jin, Xi Wang, Caiping Wang
{"title":"Effectiveness of Behavior Change Wheel-based health education for cancer pain: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Yuxuan Shi, Wenjuan Li, Rong Tang, Huan Wang, Qi Jin, Xi Wang, Caiping Wang","doi":"10.1177/03000605261487054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness and implementation characteristics of health education interventions based on the Behavior Change Wheel for adults with cancer pain.MethodsTen databases (CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, CBM, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Scopus) were searched from inception to January 2025. Randomized controlled trials evaluating Behavior Change Wheel- or Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behavior-informed health education for patients with cancer pain were included. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool. Because of substantial heterogeneity in intervention content, duration, delivery mode, and outcome measures, no meta-analysis was performed. Findings were synthesized narratively according to the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis reporting guidance. Between-group differences were calculated or extracted from individual studies and summarized as ranges across trials.ResultsOf 367 records identified, seven randomized controlled trials involving 954 patients met the inclusion criteria. All interventions were explicitly designed around Behavior Change Wheel/Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behavior principles. Behavior Change Wheel based health education was associated with reduced pain intensity, improved medication adherence, and better quality of life. For secondary outcomes, favorable effects on sleep quality and self-management ability were reported in a subset of trials, but the evidence was less consistent. Interpretation of these findings is limited by short follow-up, considerable heterogeneity in intervention content and outcome measures, and an overall moderate risk of bias.ConclusionBehavior Change Wheel based health education appears to be a promising adjunct for cancer pain management, plausibly by strengthening patients' capability, opportunity, and motivation. However, the current evidence is limited to a small number of trials with methodological concerns. Larger multicenter trials with standardized core outcomes and follow-up of at least 3-6 months are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Medical Research","volume":"54 9","pages":"3000605261487054"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605261487054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness and implementation characteristics of health education interventions based on the Behavior Change Wheel for adults with cancer pain.MethodsTen databases (CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, CBM, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Scopus) were searched from inception to January 2025. Randomized controlled trials evaluating Behavior Change Wheel- or Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behavior-informed health education for patients with cancer pain were included. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool. Because of substantial heterogeneity in intervention content, duration, delivery mode, and outcome measures, no meta-analysis was performed. Findings were synthesized narratively according to the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis reporting guidance. Between-group differences were calculated or extracted from individual studies and summarized as ranges across trials.ResultsOf 367 records identified, seven randomized controlled trials involving 954 patients met the inclusion criteria. All interventions were explicitly designed around Behavior Change Wheel/Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behavior principles. Behavior Change Wheel based health education was associated with reduced pain intensity, improved medication adherence, and better quality of life. For secondary outcomes, favorable effects on sleep quality and self-management ability were reported in a subset of trials, but the evidence was less consistent. Interpretation of these findings is limited by short follow-up, considerable heterogeneity in intervention content and outcome measures, and an overall moderate risk of bias.ConclusionBehavior Change Wheel based health education appears to be a promising adjunct for cancer pain management, plausibly by strengthening patients' capability, opportunity, and motivation. However, the current evidence is limited to a small number of trials with methodological concerns. Larger multicenter trials with standardized core outcomes and follow-up of at least 3-6 months are needed to confirm these findings.

基于行为改变轮的癌症疼痛健康教育的有效性:随机对照试验的系统回顾。
目的评价基于行为改变轮的健康教育干预对成人癌痛患者的效果及实施特点。方法检索中国知网(CNKI)、维普(VIP)、万方(Wanfang)、CBM、PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、CINAHL、Scopus等数据库,检索时间为建库至2025年1月。随机对照试验评估行为改变车轮或能力-机会-动机-行为告知健康教育对癌症疼痛患者的影响。两位审稿人独立筛选研究,提取数据,并使用Cochrane偏倚风险2工具评估偏倚风险。由于干预内容、持续时间、交付方式和结果测量存在很大的异质性,因此未进行meta分析。根据综合无meta分析报告指南对研究结果进行叙述性综合。从单个研究中计算或提取组间差异,并总结为试验间的范围。结果在确定的367项记录中,7项随机对照试验涉及954例患者符合纳入标准。所有的干预都是围绕行为改变之轮/能力-机会-动机-行为原则明确设计的。基于行为改变轮的健康教育与减轻疼痛强度、提高药物依从性和改善生活质量有关。对于次要结果,在一部分试验中报告了对睡眠质量和自我管理能力的有利影响,但证据不太一致。这些发现的解释受到随访时间短、干预内容和结果测量的相当大的异质性以及总体偏倚风险中等的限制。结论基于行为改变轮的健康教育似乎是一种很有希望的癌症疼痛管理辅助手段,似乎可以增强患者的能力、机会和动机。然而,目前的证据仅限于少数有方法学问题的试验。需要更大规模的多中心试验,标准化的核心结果和至少3-6个月的随访来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: _Journal of International Medical Research_ is a leading international journal for rapid publication of original medical, pre-clinical and clinical research, reviews, preliminary and pilot studies on a page charge basis. As a service to authors, every article accepted by peer review will be given a full technical edit to make papers as accessible and readable to the international medical community as rapidly as possible. Once the technical edit queries have been answered to the satisfaction of the journal, the paper will be published and made available freely to everyone under a creative commons licence. Symposium proceedings, summaries of presentations or collections of medical, pre-clinical or clinical data on a specific topic are welcome for publication as supplements. Print ISSN: 0300-0605
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书