Flight energetics of barn swallows across speeds: high aerodynamic efficiency, but low energy conversion efficiency.

IF 3 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Journal of Experimental Biology Pub Date : 2026-09-15 Epub Date: 2026-09-17 DOI:10.1242/jeb.252390
Pablo Macías-Torres, Sonja I Friman, L Christoffer Johansson, Anders Hedenström
{"title":"Flight energetics of barn swallows across speeds: high aerodynamic efficiency, but low energy conversion efficiency.","authors":"Pablo Macías-Torres, Sonja I Friman, L Christoffer Johansson, Anders Hedenström","doi":"10.1242/jeb.252390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bird flight conversion efficiency (η) determines the amount of metabolic power (Pmet) transformed into mechanical power (Pmech) to remain aloft, and it is central to understanding animal flight energetics, yet it remains difficult to quantify. Using 13C-labelled sodium bicarbonate (NaBi) and particle image velocimetry (PIV), we measured Pmet and Pmech, respectively, in un-instrumented barn swallows (Hirundo rustica) flying across 7.8 to 13.6 m s-1 in a wind tunnel. Both Pmet and Pmech showed the expected U-shaped relationship with airspeed. Whole-animal η showed a shallow peak at 7% at 11 m s-1. Partial efficiency (ηp), estimated from horizontal and 4 deg climbing flight, was 27% (95% confidence interval CI: -2 to 56.1). Compared with thrush nightingales previously studied under identical conditions, barn swallows exhibited higher weight-specific flight Pmet but lower lift-specific Pmech, reflecting a higher basal metabolic rate but greater aerodynamic efficiency in barn swallows. Barn swallows showed lower peak and flatter η curve across speeds compared with that of the nightingales, suggesting a trade-off between flight energetics and flight speed: higher efficiency peak over a narrow speed range (thrush nightingales) versus lower, more consistent efficiency across a broader speed range (barn swallows). Whereas nightingales fly mainly during migration, barn swallows spend much of the day airborne and use a wider range of flight speeds, potentially favouring versatility over a narrow η peak. Although η has been studied in few species, our results suggest that η is both species and speed dependent, probably shaped by species-specific ecological demands.</p>","PeriodicalId":15786,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Biology","volume":"229 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13615695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.252390","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bird flight conversion efficiency (η) determines the amount of metabolic power (Pmet) transformed into mechanical power (Pmech) to remain aloft, and it is central to understanding animal flight energetics, yet it remains difficult to quantify. Using 13C-labelled sodium bicarbonate (NaBi) and particle image velocimetry (PIV), we measured Pmet and Pmech, respectively, in un-instrumented barn swallows (Hirundo rustica) flying across 7.8 to 13.6 m s-1 in a wind tunnel. Both Pmet and Pmech showed the expected U-shaped relationship with airspeed. Whole-animal η showed a shallow peak at 7% at 11 m s-1. Partial efficiency (ηp), estimated from horizontal and 4 deg climbing flight, was 27% (95% confidence interval CI: -2 to 56.1). Compared with thrush nightingales previously studied under identical conditions, barn swallows exhibited higher weight-specific flight Pmet but lower lift-specific Pmech, reflecting a higher basal metabolic rate but greater aerodynamic efficiency in barn swallows. Barn swallows showed lower peak and flatter η curve across speeds compared with that of the nightingales, suggesting a trade-off between flight energetics and flight speed: higher efficiency peak over a narrow speed range (thrush nightingales) versus lower, more consistent efficiency across a broader speed range (barn swallows). Whereas nightingales fly mainly during migration, barn swallows spend much of the day airborne and use a wider range of flight speeds, potentially favouring versatility over a narrow η peak. Although η has been studied in few species, our results suggest that η is both species and speed dependent, probably shaped by species-specific ecological demands.

飞燕跨速度飞行能量学:高气动效率,但低能量转换效率。
鸟类飞行转换效率(η)决定了代谢能(Pmet)转化为机械能(Pmech)的数量,是理解动物飞行能量学的核心,但仍然难以量化。利用13c标记的碳酸氢钠(NaBi)和粒子图像测速法(PIV),我们分别测量了在风洞中飞行7.8 ~ 13.6 m s-1的无仪器仓燕(Hirundo rustica)的Pmet和Pmech。Pmet和Pmech均与空速呈预期的u型关系。全动物η在11 m s-1时呈7%的浅峰。从水平和4度爬升飞行中估计的部分效率(ηp)为27%(95%置信区间CI: -2至56.1)。与先前研究的相同条件下的画眉夜莺相比,仓燕表现出更高的体重特异性飞行Pmet,但更低的升力特异性Pmech,反映了仓燕更高的基础代谢率和更高的空气动力效率。与夜莺相比,仓燕在不同速度下表现出更低的峰值和更平坦的η曲线,这表明飞行能量和飞行速度之间存在权衡:在较窄的速度范围内(画眉夜莺)的效率峰值较高,而在较宽的速度范围内(仓燕)的效率峰值较低,更一致。夜莺主要在迁徙期间飞行,而仓燕则在一天中的大部分时间都在空中飞行,并且使用更大的飞行速度范围,这可能比狭窄的η峰更有利于多功能性。虽然η在少数物种中被研究过,但我们的研究结果表明,η既依赖于物种,也依赖于速度,可能是由物种特有的生态需求决定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Experimental Biology is the leading primary research journal in comparative physiology and publishes papers on the form and function of living organisms at all levels of biological organisation, from the molecular and subcellular to the integrated whole animal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书