Artificial intelligence for detection of periodontitis on radiographic images: a systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Xinyue Zhang, Zhixiang Liu, Yan Zhang, Xiaoli An
{"title":"Artificial intelligence for detection of periodontitis on radiographic images: a systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.","authors":"Xinyue Zhang, Zhixiang Liu, Yan Zhang, Xiaoli An","doi":"10.1016/j.jdent.2026.107054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) models for the periodontitis on radiographic images, and to investigate the factors influencing diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched until April 2026. A bivariate random-effects model was used to synthesise sensitivity and specificity, and meta-regression explored heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies comprising 50,080 radiographic images were included. Seven studies performed diagnosis at the patient level and seven at the tooth or image level. At the patient level, the pooled sensitivity was 0.93 (95%CI, 0.86-0.97), pooled specificity was 0.88 (0.77-0.94), and the area under each curve (AUC) of summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC) was 0.96 (0.94-0.97). At the tooth level, pooled sensitivity was 0.90 (0.83-0.94), pooled specificity was 0.94 (95%CI, 0.91-0.96), and the AUC of SROC was 0.97 (0.96-0.98). The meta-regression analysis indicates that none of the algorithm architecture, imaging modality, or external validation are sources of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI models demonstrate excellent diagnostic accuracy for periodontitis detection. Well-designed prospective studies with robust clinical reference standards, external validation, and transparent reporting are urgently required before these tools can be responsibly integrated into routine dental care. The current evidence base underrepresents low- and middle-income countries, where the burden of periodontitis is greatest and AI-assisted screening could offer the greatest public health benefit.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>AI-assisted radiographic screening may particularly benefit general dental practitioners and non-specialist clinicians in primary care or resource-limited settings, where access to periodontists is scarce and diagnostic variability is greatest. By flagging suspected moderate-to-severe periodontitis at the chairside within seconds, such tools could accelerate referral and triage decisions, enabling earlier definitive examination and treatment planning by specialists, while reducing the number of patients with advanced disease who are overlooked during routine dental visits.</p>","PeriodicalId":15585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"107054"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2026.107054","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) models for the periodontitis on radiographic images, and to investigate the factors influencing diagnostic performance.

Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched until April 2026. A bivariate random-effects model was used to synthesise sensitivity and specificity, and meta-regression explored heterogeneity.

Results: Fourteen studies comprising 50,080 radiographic images were included. Seven studies performed diagnosis at the patient level and seven at the tooth or image level. At the patient level, the pooled sensitivity was 0.93 (95%CI, 0.86-0.97), pooled specificity was 0.88 (0.77-0.94), and the area under each curve (AUC) of summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC) was 0.96 (0.94-0.97). At the tooth level, pooled sensitivity was 0.90 (0.83-0.94), pooled specificity was 0.94 (95%CI, 0.91-0.96), and the AUC of SROC was 0.97 (0.96-0.98). The meta-regression analysis indicates that none of the algorithm architecture, imaging modality, or external validation are sources of heterogeneity.

Conclusions: AI models demonstrate excellent diagnostic accuracy for periodontitis detection. Well-designed prospective studies with robust clinical reference standards, external validation, and transparent reporting are urgently required before these tools can be responsibly integrated into routine dental care. The current evidence base underrepresents low- and middle-income countries, where the burden of periodontitis is greatest and AI-assisted screening could offer the greatest public health benefit.

Clinical significance: AI-assisted radiographic screening may particularly benefit general dental practitioners and non-specialist clinicians in primary care or resource-limited settings, where access to periodontists is scarce and diagnostic variability is greatest. By flagging suspected moderate-to-severe periodontitis at the chairside within seconds, such tools could accelerate referral and triage decisions, enabling earlier definitive examination and treatment planning by specialists, while reducing the number of patients with advanced disease who are overlooked during routine dental visits.

人工智能检测牙周炎放射图像:系统回顾和诊断测试准确性荟萃分析。
目的:探讨人工智能(AI)模型对牙周炎x线影像诊断的准确性,并探讨影响诊断效果的因素。方法:检索PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library,检索截止至2026年4月。采用双变量随机效应模型综合敏感性和特异性,meta回归探讨异质性。结果:纳入14项研究,包括50,080张放射图像。7项研究在患者水平进行诊断,7项研究在牙齿或图像水平进行诊断。在患者水平上,合并敏感性为0.93 (95%CI, 0.86 ~ 0.97),合并特异性为0.88(0.77 ~ 0.94),综合受试者工作特征曲线(SROC)每条曲线下面积(AUC)为0.96(0.94 ~ 0.97)。在牙齿水平上,合并敏感性为0.90(0.83-0.94),合并特异性为0.94 (95%CI, 0.91-0.96), SROC的AUC为0.97(0.96-0.98)。元回归分析表明,算法架构、成像方式或外部验证都不是异质性的来源。结论:人工智能模型在牙周炎检测中具有良好的诊断准确性。在这些工具能够负责任地整合到常规牙科护理之前,迫切需要设计良好的前瞻性研究,具有强大的临床参考标准,外部验证和透明的报告。目前的证据基础不足以代表低收入和中等收入国家,在这些国家牙周炎负担最重,人工智能辅助筛查可以提供最大的公共卫生效益。临床意义:人工智能辅助放射筛查可能特别有利于初级保健或资源有限的环境中的普通牙科医生和非专业临床医生,在这些环境中,获得牙周病医生的机会很少,诊断的可变性最大。通过在几秒钟内在椅子旁标记疑似中重度牙周炎,这些工具可以加速转诊和分诊决定,使专家能够更早地进行明确的检查和治疗计划,同时减少在常规牙科就诊中被忽视的晚期疾病患者的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of dentistry
Journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
349
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dentistry has an open access mirror journal The Journal of Dentistry: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The Journal of Dentistry is the leading international dental journal within the field of Restorative Dentistry. Placing an emphasis on publishing novel and high-quality research papers, the Journal aims to influence the practice of dentistry at clinician, research, industry and policy-maker level on an international basis. Topics covered include the management of dental disease, periodontology, endodontology, operative dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, dental biomaterials science, long-term clinical trials including epidemiology and oral health, technology transfer of new scientific instrumentation or procedures, as well as clinically relevant oral biology and translational research. The Journal of Dentistry will publish original scientific research papers including short communications. It is also interested in publishing review articles and leaders in themed areas which will be linked to new scientific research. Conference proceedings are also welcome and expressions of interest should be communicated to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书