Development and Validation of The Skin Graft Loss Risk Estimator: An Interpretable Machine Learning-Driven Tool for Individualized Assessment in Burn Patients.
Abbas M Hassan, Hilary Y Liu, Leigh J Spera, Francesco M Egro
{"title":"Development and Validation of The Skin Graft Loss Risk Estimator: An Interpretable Machine Learning-Driven Tool for Individualized Assessment in Burn Patients.","authors":"Abbas M Hassan, Hilary Y Liu, Leigh J Spera, Francesco M Egro","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irag166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Skin graft failure is a significant complication in burn care that prolongs recovery, compromises surgical outcomes, and necessitates repeat operations. Accurate risk assessment is challenging due to a complex interplay of patient and injury factors, underscoring the need for objective, data-driven predictive tools. We developed and validated an interpretable machine learning (ML)-driven tool to provide individualized, data-driven risk assessment for skin graft loss in burn patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort study of patients who had autologous skin grafting from the American Burn Association Burn Care Quality Platform was conducted from 2013-2022. A Random Forest ML model was developed and validated on independent training (70%), validation (15%), and testing (15%) sets. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 286,479 patients during the study period, 24,046 underwent autologous skin grafting. ML demonstrated discriminatory predictive performance with AUC-ROC of 0.794. Burns ≥40% total body burn surface area (OR 8.16, p<0.001), history of alcohol abuse (OR 1.86, p<0.001), active tobacco use (OR 1.45, p=0.004), age >60 years (OR 1.70, p=0.013), hypertension (OR 1.52, p=0.003), male sex (OR 0.74, p=0.009), diabetes mellitus (OR 1.45, p=0.030) and contact burns (OR 1.70, p=0.006) emerged as independent predictors of graft loss. The model was translated into an interactive, interpretable web-based clinical tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Skin Graft Loss Risk Estimator provides a transparent, interpretable and personalized risk assessment of skin graft loss to enhance clinical judgment, facilitate effective patient counselling and surgical planning in burn care.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irag166","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Skin graft failure is a significant complication in burn care that prolongs recovery, compromises surgical outcomes, and necessitates repeat operations. Accurate risk assessment is challenging due to a complex interplay of patient and injury factors, underscoring the need for objective, data-driven predictive tools. We developed and validated an interpretable machine learning (ML)-driven tool to provide individualized, data-driven risk assessment for skin graft loss in burn patients.
Methods: A cohort study of patients who had autologous skin grafting from the American Burn Association Burn Care Quality Platform was conducted from 2013-2022. A Random Forest ML model was developed and validated on independent training (70%), validation (15%), and testing (15%) sets. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC).
Results: Of 286,479 patients during the study period, 24,046 underwent autologous skin grafting. ML demonstrated discriminatory predictive performance with AUC-ROC of 0.794. Burns ≥40% total body burn surface area (OR 8.16, p<0.001), history of alcohol abuse (OR 1.86, p<0.001), active tobacco use (OR 1.45, p=0.004), age >60 years (OR 1.70, p=0.013), hypertension (OR 1.52, p=0.003), male sex (OR 0.74, p=0.009), diabetes mellitus (OR 1.45, p=0.030) and contact burns (OR 1.70, p=0.006) emerged as independent predictors of graft loss. The model was translated into an interactive, interpretable web-based clinical tool.
Conclusions: The Skin Graft Loss Risk Estimator provides a transparent, interpretable and personalized risk assessment of skin graft loss to enhance clinical judgment, facilitate effective patient counselling and surgical planning in burn care.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.