Development and Validation of The Skin Graft Loss Risk Estimator: An Interpretable Machine Learning-Driven Tool for Individualized Assessment in Burn Patients.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Abbas M Hassan, Hilary Y Liu, Leigh J Spera, Francesco M Egro
{"title":"Development and Validation of The Skin Graft Loss Risk Estimator: An Interpretable Machine Learning-Driven Tool for Individualized Assessment in Burn Patients.","authors":"Abbas M Hassan, Hilary Y Liu, Leigh J Spera, Francesco M Egro","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irag166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Skin graft failure is a significant complication in burn care that prolongs recovery, compromises surgical outcomes, and necessitates repeat operations. Accurate risk assessment is challenging due to a complex interplay of patient and injury factors, underscoring the need for objective, data-driven predictive tools. We developed and validated an interpretable machine learning (ML)-driven tool to provide individualized, data-driven risk assessment for skin graft loss in burn patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort study of patients who had autologous skin grafting from the American Burn Association Burn Care Quality Platform was conducted from 2013-2022. A Random Forest ML model was developed and validated on independent training (70%), validation (15%), and testing (15%) sets. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 286,479 patients during the study period, 24,046 underwent autologous skin grafting. ML demonstrated discriminatory predictive performance with AUC-ROC of 0.794. Burns ≥40% total body burn surface area (OR 8.16, p<0.001), history of alcohol abuse (OR 1.86, p<0.001), active tobacco use (OR 1.45, p=0.004), age >60 years (OR 1.70, p=0.013), hypertension (OR 1.52, p=0.003), male sex (OR 0.74, p=0.009), diabetes mellitus (OR 1.45, p=0.030) and contact burns (OR 1.70, p=0.006) emerged as independent predictors of graft loss. The model was translated into an interactive, interpretable web-based clinical tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Skin Graft Loss Risk Estimator provides a transparent, interpretable and personalized risk assessment of skin graft loss to enhance clinical judgment, facilitate effective patient counselling and surgical planning in burn care.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irag166","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Skin graft failure is a significant complication in burn care that prolongs recovery, compromises surgical outcomes, and necessitates repeat operations. Accurate risk assessment is challenging due to a complex interplay of patient and injury factors, underscoring the need for objective, data-driven predictive tools. We developed and validated an interpretable machine learning (ML)-driven tool to provide individualized, data-driven risk assessment for skin graft loss in burn patients.

Methods: A cohort study of patients who had autologous skin grafting from the American Burn Association Burn Care Quality Platform was conducted from 2013-2022. A Random Forest ML model was developed and validated on independent training (70%), validation (15%), and testing (15%) sets. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC).

Results: Of 286,479 patients during the study period, 24,046 underwent autologous skin grafting. ML demonstrated discriminatory predictive performance with AUC-ROC of 0.794. Burns ≥40% total body burn surface area (OR 8.16, p<0.001), history of alcohol abuse (OR 1.86, p<0.001), active tobacco use (OR 1.45, p=0.004), age >60 years (OR 1.70, p=0.013), hypertension (OR 1.52, p=0.003), male sex (OR 0.74, p=0.009), diabetes mellitus (OR 1.45, p=0.030) and contact burns (OR 1.70, p=0.006) emerged as independent predictors of graft loss. The model was translated into an interactive, interpretable web-based clinical tool.

Conclusions: The Skin Graft Loss Risk Estimator provides a transparent, interpretable and personalized risk assessment of skin graft loss to enhance clinical judgment, facilitate effective patient counselling and surgical planning in burn care.

皮肤移植损失风险评估器的开发和验证:一个可解释的机器学习驱动的工具,用于烧伤患者的个性化评估。
背景:皮肤移植失败是烧伤护理的重要并发症,它延长了恢复时间,影响了手术效果,并且需要重复手术。由于患者和损伤因素的复杂相互作用,准确的风险评估具有挑战性,因此需要客观、数据驱动的预测工具。我们开发并验证了一种可解释的机器学习(ML)驱动的工具,为烧伤患者的植皮丢失提供个性化的、数据驱动的风险评估。方法:对2013-2022年美国烧伤协会烧伤护理质量平台的自体皮移植患者进行队列研究。在独立训练集(70%)、验证集(15%)和测试集(15%)上开发并验证了随机森林ML模型。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC-ROC)评估模型性能。结果:在研究期间的286,479例患者中,24,046例接受了自体皮肤移植。ML具有歧视性预测性能,AUC-ROC为0.794。烧伤≥40%的全身烧伤表面积(OR 8.16, p=0.013)、高血压(OR 1.52, p=0.003)、男性(OR 0.74, p=0.009)、糖尿病(OR 1.45, p=0.030)和接触性烧伤(OR 1.70, p=0.006)成为移植物损失的独立预测因素。该模型被翻译成一个交互式的、可解释的基于网络的临床工具。结论:植皮损失风险评估器提供了一个透明、可解释和个性化的植皮损失风险评估,以增强临床判断,促进有效的患者咨询和烧伤护理的手术计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书