Association Between Primary vs. Secondary Endodontic Infection and Maxillary Sinus Schneiderian Membrane Thickness on CBCT: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
International Journal of Dentistry Pub Date : 2026-09-16 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ijod/8232083
Seyyed Amir Seyyedi, Aisan Ghaznavi, Salar Payahoo, Maryam Rezaeipour, Mohammad Reza Ghorbani Afkhami
{"title":"Association Between Primary vs. Secondary Endodontic Infection and Maxillary Sinus Schneiderian Membrane Thickness on CBCT: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Seyyed Amir Seyyedi, Aisan Ghaznavi, Salar Payahoo, Maryam Rezaeipour, Mohammad Reza Ghorbani Afkhami","doi":"10.1155/ijod/8232083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Changes in the maxillary sinus mucosa and increased thickness of the Schneiderian membrane in the vicinity of endodontic lesions are common findings on CBCT. The aim of this study was to compare Schneiderian membrane thickness (SMT) in the maxillary sinus adjacent to primary and secondary endodontic infections and to investigate its relationship with selected radiographic variables.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study was performed on archival CBCT images. A total of 172 CBCT scans, including 86 cases with primary endodontic lesions and 86 cases with secondary endodontic lesions, were evaluated between September 2023 and March 2024. The study variables included SMT, bone thickness (BT) between the lesion and the sinus floor, lesion volume (LV), mucosal morphology, and alveolar bone perforation. Inter-rater reliability for quantitative measurements was assessed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In the total sample, the mean SMT was 3.72 ± 2.24 mm. Alveolar bone perforation was present in 62 cases. The mean SMT was 3.74 ± 2.01 mm in the primary group and 3.69 ± 2.46 mm in the secondary group. The mean difference was 0.06 mm (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: -0.63 to 0.71 mm), with no significant difference between the groups (<i>p</i> = 0.401). No significant correlations were observed between SMT and age, LV, or BT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this CBCT study, SMT was not significantly associated with primary versus secondary endodontic lesions. In addition, no significant associations were observed between SMT and age, LV, or BT between the lesion and the sinus floor. These findings should be interpreted as radiographic associations rather than causal relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":13947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dentistry","volume":"2026 ","pages":"8232083"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13579627/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijod/8232083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Changes in the maxillary sinus mucosa and increased thickness of the Schneiderian membrane in the vicinity of endodontic lesions are common findings on CBCT. The aim of this study was to compare Schneiderian membrane thickness (SMT) in the maxillary sinus adjacent to primary and secondary endodontic infections and to investigate its relationship with selected radiographic variables.

Materials and methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study was performed on archival CBCT images. A total of 172 CBCT scans, including 86 cases with primary endodontic lesions and 86 cases with secondary endodontic lesions, were evaluated between September 2023 and March 2024. The study variables included SMT, bone thickness (BT) between the lesion and the sinus floor, lesion volume (LV), mucosal morphology, and alveolar bone perforation. Inter-rater reliability for quantitative measurements was assessed.

Findings: In the total sample, the mean SMT was 3.72 ± 2.24 mm. Alveolar bone perforation was present in 62 cases. The mean SMT was 3.74 ± 2.01 mm in the primary group and 3.69 ± 2.46 mm in the secondary group. The mean difference was 0.06 mm (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: -0.63 to 0.71 mm), with no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.401). No significant correlations were observed between SMT and age, LV, or BT.

Conclusion: In this CBCT study, SMT was not significantly associated with primary versus secondary endodontic lesions. In addition, no significant associations were observed between SMT and age, LV, or BT between the lesion and the sinus floor. These findings should be interpreted as radiographic associations rather than causal relationships.

原发性和继发性牙髓感染与上颌窦施耐德膜CBCT厚度的关系:一项横断面研究。
背景与目的:牙髓病变附近上颌窦黏膜改变和施耐德膜厚度增加是CBCT的常见表现。本研究的目的是比较原发性和继发性牙髓感染相邻上颌窦的施耐德膜厚度(SMT),并探讨其与选定的影像学变量的关系。材料和方法:本回顾性横断面研究是对档案CBCT图像进行的。在2023年9月至2024年3月期间,共对172例CBCT扫描进行了评估,其中包括86例原发性牙髓病变和86例继发性牙髓病变。研究变量包括SMT、病变与窦底之间的骨厚度(BT)、病变体积(LV)、粘膜形态和牙槽骨穿孔。评估了定量测量的量表间信度。结果:在整个样本中,平均SMT为3.72±2.24 mm。牙槽骨穿孔62例。原发组平均SMT为3.74±2.01 mm,继发组平均SMT为3.69±2.46 mm。平均差异为0.06 mm(95%可信区间[95% CI]: -0.63 ~ 0.71 mm),组间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.401)。结论:在这项CBCT研究中,SMT与原发性牙髓病变和继发性牙髓病变没有显著相关性。此外,SMT与年龄、LV或病变与窦底之间的BT之间没有明显关联。这些发现应被解释为放射学上的关联,而不是因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Dentistry
International Journal of Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
219
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书