Hybrid EEG-EMG intention decoding for real-time triggering of a lower-limb exoskeleton.

IF 3.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Frontiers in Neurorobotics Pub Date : 2026-09-03 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnbot.2026.1914651
Ke Wang, Wenshan Li, Danyang Ding, Lei Wang, Yue Sun, Hongbo Zhao, Weijun Gong
{"title":"Hybrid EEG-EMG intention decoding for real-time triggering of a lower-limb exoskeleton.","authors":"Ke Wang, Wenshan Li, Danyang Ding, Lei Wang, Yue Sun, Hongbo Zhao, Weijun Gong","doi":"10.3389/fnbot.2026.1914651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Wearable lower-limb exoskeletons have the potential to support intention-driven control of lower-limb exoskeletons, but existing control strategies often rely on mechanical or manual triggers that fail to capture user intent.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Subjects were recruited from 23/9/2024 to 10/2/2025. A BiLSTM detector was pretrained on a dataset collected from 50 healthy volunteers (45 for training, 5 for independent testing) using bilateral surface EMG recordings from six lower-limb muscles (12 EMG channels), 16-channel EEG, and hip-knee kinematics. Seven naive participants then completed ten 20-m outward-and-return walking trials (10 m outward and 10 m return) under each of three control modes (EMG, EEG, hybrid). Primary outcomes were triggering latency and classification accuracy. Triggering latency was defined as the time interval between the onset of the gait-transition event and the activation of the exoskeleton assistance command. This latency included the observation delay introduced by the sliding window, feature extraction time, BiLSTM inference time, and communication delay between the decoder and the exoskeleton controller. Usability was assessed with donning/doffing times and QUEST 2.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The hybrid BiLSTM detector achieved higher classification accuracy (left: 91.3%; right: 86.6%) and shorter mean per-step triggering latency (left: 0.29 s; right: 0.28 s) than either EMG-only (mean 0.33 s) or EEG-only approaches (mean 0.30 s). Hybrid EEG-EMG fusion therefore improved decoding performance while reducing triggering latency compared with unimodal decoding strategies. The latency reduction relative to EMG-only control corresponded to a large effect size (Cohen's d ≈ 0.88). Hybrid sessions also yielded shorter total session time (mean 32.1 min). Usability metrics demonstrated acceptable donning/doffing times and favorable QUEST 2.0 scores (mean 32.0/40).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These proof-of-concept results demonstrate that BiLSTM-based fusion of EEG and EMG improves responsiveness and classification reliability for exoskeleton assistance. These findings underscore the contribution of EEG-derived sensorimotor features and EMG information for intention-related gait transition detection within a multimodal real-time exoskeleton control framework. We discuss limitations related to sample size, artifact validation, and generalizability and identify next steps for patient studies and ergonomic optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":12628,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurorobotics","volume":"20 ","pages":"1914651"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13581620/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurorobotics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2026.1914651","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Wearable lower-limb exoskeletons have the potential to support intention-driven control of lower-limb exoskeletons, but existing control strategies often rely on mechanical or manual triggers that fail to capture user intent.

Method: Subjects were recruited from 23/9/2024 to 10/2/2025. A BiLSTM detector was pretrained on a dataset collected from 50 healthy volunteers (45 for training, 5 for independent testing) using bilateral surface EMG recordings from six lower-limb muscles (12 EMG channels), 16-channel EEG, and hip-knee kinematics. Seven naive participants then completed ten 20-m outward-and-return walking trials (10 m outward and 10 m return) under each of three control modes (EMG, EEG, hybrid). Primary outcomes were triggering latency and classification accuracy. Triggering latency was defined as the time interval between the onset of the gait-transition event and the activation of the exoskeleton assistance command. This latency included the observation delay introduced by the sliding window, feature extraction time, BiLSTM inference time, and communication delay between the decoder and the exoskeleton controller. Usability was assessed with donning/doffing times and QUEST 2.0.

Results: The hybrid BiLSTM detector achieved higher classification accuracy (left: 91.3%; right: 86.6%) and shorter mean per-step triggering latency (left: 0.29 s; right: 0.28 s) than either EMG-only (mean 0.33 s) or EEG-only approaches (mean 0.30 s). Hybrid EEG-EMG fusion therefore improved decoding performance while reducing triggering latency compared with unimodal decoding strategies. The latency reduction relative to EMG-only control corresponded to a large effect size (Cohen's d ≈ 0.88). Hybrid sessions also yielded shorter total session time (mean 32.1 min). Usability metrics demonstrated acceptable donning/doffing times and favorable QUEST 2.0 scores (mean 32.0/40).

Conclusion: These proof-of-concept results demonstrate that BiLSTM-based fusion of EEG and EMG improves responsiveness and classification reliability for exoskeleton assistance. These findings underscore the contribution of EEG-derived sensorimotor features and EMG information for intention-related gait transition detection within a multimodal real-time exoskeleton control framework. We discuss limitations related to sample size, artifact validation, and generalizability and identify next steps for patient studies and ergonomic optimization.

用于实时触发下肢外骨骼的混合脑电图-肌电图意图解码。
背景:可穿戴下肢外骨骼具有支持下肢外骨骼意图驱动控制的潜力,但现有的控制策略通常依赖于机械或手动触发,无法捕捉用户意图。方法:受试者于2024年9月23日至2025年2月10日招募。BiLSTM检测器在50名健康志愿者(45名用于训练,5名用于独立测试)收集的数据集上进行预训练,使用来自6个下肢肌肉(12个肌电信号通道)的双侧表面肌电信号记录,16通道脑电图和髋关节-膝关节运动学。然后,在三种控制模式(肌电图、脑电图、混合模式)下,7名天真的参与者完成了10次20米外走和返回的步行试验(10 米外走和10 米返回)。主要结果为触发延迟和分类准确性。触发延迟被定义为步态转换事件开始和外骨骼辅助命令激活之间的时间间隔。该延迟包括滑动窗口引入的观测延迟、特征提取时间、BiLSTM推理时间以及解码器与外骨骼控制器之间的通信延迟。可用性评估与穿衣/落纱时间和QUEST 2.0。结果:混合BiLSTM检测器的分类准确率(左:91.3%,右:86.6%)和平均每步触发延迟(左:0.29 s,右:0.28 s)均高于单肌电法(平均0.33 s)或单脑电法(平均0.30 s)。因此,与单模解码策略相比,混合EEG-EMG融合提高了解码性能,同时减少了触发延迟。相对于仅肌电图对照,潜伏期减少对应于较大的效应量(Cohen’s d ≈ 0.88)。混合会话产生的总会话时间也更短(平均32.1 min)。可用性指标显示了可接受的穿衣/脱衣时间和有利的QUEST 2.0分数(平均32.0/40)。结论:这些概念验证结果表明,基于bilstm的脑电和肌电融合提高了外骨骼辅助的反应性和分类可靠性。这些发现强调了在多模态实时外骨骼控制框架中,eeg衍生的感觉运动特征和肌电图信息对意图相关步态转换检测的贡献。我们讨论了与样本量、伪迹验证和普遍性相关的限制,并确定了患者研究和人体工程学优化的下一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neurorobotics
Frontiers in Neurorobotics COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCER-ROBOTICS
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.50%
发文量
250
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Neurorobotics publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research in the science and technology of embodied autonomous neural systems. Specialty Chief Editors Alois C. Knoll and Florian Röhrbein at the Technische Universität München are supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics and the public worldwide. Neural systems include brain-inspired algorithms (e.g. connectionist networks), computational models of biological neural networks (e.g. artificial spiking neural nets, large-scale simulations of neural microcircuits) and actual biological systems (e.g. in vivo and in vitro neural nets). The focus of the journal is the embodiment of such neural systems in artificial software and hardware devices, machines, robots or any other form of physical actuation. This also includes prosthetic devices, brain machine interfaces, wearable systems, micro-machines, furniture, home appliances, as well as systems for managing micro and macro infrastructures. Frontiers in Neurorobotics also aims to publish radically new tools and methods to study plasticity and development of autonomous self-learning systems that are capable of acquiring knowledge in an open-ended manner. Models complemented with experimental studies revealing self-organizing principles of embodied neural systems are welcome. Our journal also publishes on the micro and macro engineering and mechatronics of robotic devices driven by neural systems, as well as studies on the impact that such systems will have on our daily life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书