Ke Wang, Wenshan Li, Danyang Ding, Lei Wang, Yue Sun, Hongbo Zhao, Weijun Gong
{"title":"Hybrid EEG-EMG intention decoding for real-time triggering of a lower-limb exoskeleton.","authors":"Ke Wang, Wenshan Li, Danyang Ding, Lei Wang, Yue Sun, Hongbo Zhao, Weijun Gong","doi":"10.3389/fnbot.2026.1914651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Wearable lower-limb exoskeletons have the potential to support intention-driven control of lower-limb exoskeletons, but existing control strategies often rely on mechanical or manual triggers that fail to capture user intent.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Subjects were recruited from 23/9/2024 to 10/2/2025. A BiLSTM detector was pretrained on a dataset collected from 50 healthy volunteers (45 for training, 5 for independent testing) using bilateral surface EMG recordings from six lower-limb muscles (12 EMG channels), 16-channel EEG, and hip-knee kinematics. Seven naive participants then completed ten 20-m outward-and-return walking trials (10 m outward and 10 m return) under each of three control modes (EMG, EEG, hybrid). Primary outcomes were triggering latency and classification accuracy. Triggering latency was defined as the time interval between the onset of the gait-transition event and the activation of the exoskeleton assistance command. This latency included the observation delay introduced by the sliding window, feature extraction time, BiLSTM inference time, and communication delay between the decoder and the exoskeleton controller. Usability was assessed with donning/doffing times and QUEST 2.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The hybrid BiLSTM detector achieved higher classification accuracy (left: 91.3%; right: 86.6%) and shorter mean per-step triggering latency (left: 0.29 s; right: 0.28 s) than either EMG-only (mean 0.33 s) or EEG-only approaches (mean 0.30 s). Hybrid EEG-EMG fusion therefore improved decoding performance while reducing triggering latency compared with unimodal decoding strategies. The latency reduction relative to EMG-only control corresponded to a large effect size (Cohen's d ≈ 0.88). Hybrid sessions also yielded shorter total session time (mean 32.1 min). Usability metrics demonstrated acceptable donning/doffing times and favorable QUEST 2.0 scores (mean 32.0/40).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These proof-of-concept results demonstrate that BiLSTM-based fusion of EEG and EMG improves responsiveness and classification reliability for exoskeleton assistance. These findings underscore the contribution of EEG-derived sensorimotor features and EMG information for intention-related gait transition detection within a multimodal real-time exoskeleton control framework. We discuss limitations related to sample size, artifact validation, and generalizability and identify next steps for patient studies and ergonomic optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":12628,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurorobotics","volume":"20 ","pages":"1914651"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13581620/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurorobotics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2026.1914651","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Wearable lower-limb exoskeletons have the potential to support intention-driven control of lower-limb exoskeletons, but existing control strategies often rely on mechanical or manual triggers that fail to capture user intent.
Method: Subjects were recruited from 23/9/2024 to 10/2/2025. A BiLSTM detector was pretrained on a dataset collected from 50 healthy volunteers (45 for training, 5 for independent testing) using bilateral surface EMG recordings from six lower-limb muscles (12 EMG channels), 16-channel EEG, and hip-knee kinematics. Seven naive participants then completed ten 20-m outward-and-return walking trials (10 m outward and 10 m return) under each of three control modes (EMG, EEG, hybrid). Primary outcomes were triggering latency and classification accuracy. Triggering latency was defined as the time interval between the onset of the gait-transition event and the activation of the exoskeleton assistance command. This latency included the observation delay introduced by the sliding window, feature extraction time, BiLSTM inference time, and communication delay between the decoder and the exoskeleton controller. Usability was assessed with donning/doffing times and QUEST 2.0.
Results: The hybrid BiLSTM detector achieved higher classification accuracy (left: 91.3%; right: 86.6%) and shorter mean per-step triggering latency (left: 0.29 s; right: 0.28 s) than either EMG-only (mean 0.33 s) or EEG-only approaches (mean 0.30 s). Hybrid EEG-EMG fusion therefore improved decoding performance while reducing triggering latency compared with unimodal decoding strategies. The latency reduction relative to EMG-only control corresponded to a large effect size (Cohen's d ≈ 0.88). Hybrid sessions also yielded shorter total session time (mean 32.1 min). Usability metrics demonstrated acceptable donning/doffing times and favorable QUEST 2.0 scores (mean 32.0/40).
Conclusion: These proof-of-concept results demonstrate that BiLSTM-based fusion of EEG and EMG improves responsiveness and classification reliability for exoskeleton assistance. These findings underscore the contribution of EEG-derived sensorimotor features and EMG information for intention-related gait transition detection within a multimodal real-time exoskeleton control framework. We discuss limitations related to sample size, artifact validation, and generalizability and identify next steps for patient studies and ergonomic optimization.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Neurorobotics publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research in the science and technology of embodied autonomous neural systems. Specialty Chief Editors Alois C. Knoll and Florian Röhrbein at the Technische Universität München are supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics and the public worldwide.
Neural systems include brain-inspired algorithms (e.g. connectionist networks), computational models of biological neural networks (e.g. artificial spiking neural nets, large-scale simulations of neural microcircuits) and actual biological systems (e.g. in vivo and in vitro neural nets). The focus of the journal is the embodiment of such neural systems in artificial software and hardware devices, machines, robots or any other form of physical actuation. This also includes prosthetic devices, brain machine interfaces, wearable systems, micro-machines, furniture, home appliances, as well as systems for managing micro and macro infrastructures. Frontiers in Neurorobotics also aims to publish radically new tools and methods to study plasticity and development of autonomous self-learning systems that are capable of acquiring knowledge in an open-ended manner. Models complemented with experimental studies revealing self-organizing principles of embodied neural systems are welcome. Our journal also publishes on the micro and macro engineering and mechatronics of robotic devices driven by neural systems, as well as studies on the impact that such systems will have on our daily life.