Influence of Various Tooth Preparation Designs on Stress Distribution in Anterior Ceramic Veneers: A Systematic Review of Finite Element Analysis Studies.
{"title":"Influence of Various Tooth Preparation Designs on Stress Distribution in Anterior Ceramic Veneers: A Systematic Review of Finite Element Analysis Studies.","authors":"Atiyeh Feiz, Mostafa Farajzadeh, Ahmad Farajzadeh","doi":"10.1111/jerd.70261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review compared the stress distribution patterns in anterior ceramic veneers with different tooth preparation designs by evaluating finite element analysis (FEA) studies, aiming to improve understanding of this biomechanical aspect related to clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase, along with gray literature sources was performed (January 1990-June 2025) to identify FEA studies comparing at least two preparation designs based on a modified preparation classification. Data were extracted using a customized form, and risk of bias was assessed with the ROBFEAD tool. (PROSPERO: CRD420251127762).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 9576 studies, 34 were included. In veneers and cement layers, stress concentration was most observed at both incisal and cervical regions, whereas cervical concentration predominated in tooth structures. Higher loading angles increased stress values. Preparations without incisal reduction often showed stress values comparable to or greater than those with incisal reduction. Designs with palatal chamfer frequently demonstrated additional stress concentration in the palatal region.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preparation design and loading angle influence stress distribution patterns in veneer restorations; however, no single design consistently demonstrates biomechanically superior performance across all conditions. Further standardized FEA studies with clearly justified modeling assumptions are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.70261","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This systematic review compared the stress distribution patterns in anterior ceramic veneers with different tooth preparation designs by evaluating finite element analysis (FEA) studies, aiming to improve understanding of this biomechanical aspect related to clinical outcomes.
Materials and methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase, along with gray literature sources was performed (January 1990-June 2025) to identify FEA studies comparing at least two preparation designs based on a modified preparation classification. Data were extracted using a customized form, and risk of bias was assessed with the ROBFEAD tool. (PROSPERO: CRD420251127762).
Results: Out of 9576 studies, 34 were included. In veneers and cement layers, stress concentration was most observed at both incisal and cervical regions, whereas cervical concentration predominated in tooth structures. Higher loading angles increased stress values. Preparations without incisal reduction often showed stress values comparable to or greater than those with incisal reduction. Designs with palatal chamfer frequently demonstrated additional stress concentration in the palatal region.
Conclusions: Preparation design and loading angle influence stress distribution patterns in veneer restorations; however, no single design consistently demonstrates biomechanically superior performance across all conditions. Further standardized FEA studies with clearly justified modeling assumptions are recommended.
目的:本系统综述通过对有限元分析(FEA)研究的评价,比较不同牙体预备设计的前牙烤瓷贴面的应力分布模式,旨在提高对这一与临床结果相关的生物力学方面的理解。材料和方法:系统检索PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science和Embase,以及灰色文献来源(1990年1月- 2025年6月),以确定FEA研究比较至少两种基于改进制剂分类的制剂设计。使用定制表格提取数据,并使用ROBFEAD工具评估偏倚风险。(普洛斯彼罗:CRD420251127762)。结果:9576项研究中,34项被纳入。在贴面和骨水泥层中,切牙和颈椎区域的应力集中最多,而牙结构中颈椎区域的应力集中最多。加载角度越大,应力值越大。没有切痕复位的制剂通常显示出与切痕复位相当或更大的应力值。带有腭倒角的设计经常在腭区显示额外的应力集中。结论:制备设计和加载角度影响单板修复体的应力分布规律;然而,没有一种设计在所有条件下都能始终如一地表现出优异的生物力学性能。建议进一步标准化的有限元分析研究,明确合理的建模假设。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features.
The range of topics covered in the journal includes:
- Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts
- Implants
- Conservative adhesive restorations
- Tooth Whitening
- Prosthodontic materials and techniques
- Dental materials
- Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics
- Esthetics related research
- Innovations in esthetics