Influence of Various Tooth Preparation Designs on Stress Distribution in Anterior Ceramic Veneers: A Systematic Review of Finite Element Analysis Studies.

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Atiyeh Feiz, Mostafa Farajzadeh, Ahmad Farajzadeh
{"title":"Influence of Various Tooth Preparation Designs on Stress Distribution in Anterior Ceramic Veneers: A Systematic Review of Finite Element Analysis Studies.","authors":"Atiyeh Feiz, Mostafa Farajzadeh, Ahmad Farajzadeh","doi":"10.1111/jerd.70261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review compared the stress distribution patterns in anterior ceramic veneers with different tooth preparation designs by evaluating finite element analysis (FEA) studies, aiming to improve understanding of this biomechanical aspect related to clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase, along with gray literature sources was performed (January 1990-June 2025) to identify FEA studies comparing at least two preparation designs based on a modified preparation classification. Data were extracted using a customized form, and risk of bias was assessed with the ROBFEAD tool. (PROSPERO: CRD420251127762).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 9576 studies, 34 were included. In veneers and cement layers, stress concentration was most observed at both incisal and cervical regions, whereas cervical concentration predominated in tooth structures. Higher loading angles increased stress values. Preparations without incisal reduction often showed stress values comparable to or greater than those with incisal reduction. Designs with palatal chamfer frequently demonstrated additional stress concentration in the palatal region.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preparation design and loading angle influence stress distribution patterns in veneer restorations; however, no single design consistently demonstrates biomechanically superior performance across all conditions. Further standardized FEA studies with clearly justified modeling assumptions are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.70261","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review compared the stress distribution patterns in anterior ceramic veneers with different tooth preparation designs by evaluating finite element analysis (FEA) studies, aiming to improve understanding of this biomechanical aspect related to clinical outcomes.

Materials and methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase, along with gray literature sources was performed (January 1990-June 2025) to identify FEA studies comparing at least two preparation designs based on a modified preparation classification. Data were extracted using a customized form, and risk of bias was assessed with the ROBFEAD tool. (PROSPERO: CRD420251127762).

Results: Out of 9576 studies, 34 were included. In veneers and cement layers, stress concentration was most observed at both incisal and cervical regions, whereas cervical concentration predominated in tooth structures. Higher loading angles increased stress values. Preparations without incisal reduction often showed stress values comparable to or greater than those with incisal reduction. Designs with palatal chamfer frequently demonstrated additional stress concentration in the palatal region.

Conclusions: Preparation design and loading angle influence stress distribution patterns in veneer restorations; however, no single design consistently demonstrates biomechanically superior performance across all conditions. Further standardized FEA studies with clearly justified modeling assumptions are recommended.

不同牙齿预备设计对前牙烤瓷贴面应力分布的影响:有限元分析研究的系统回顾。
目的:本系统综述通过对有限元分析(FEA)研究的评价,比较不同牙体预备设计的前牙烤瓷贴面的应力分布模式,旨在提高对这一与临床结果相关的生物力学方面的理解。材料和方法:系统检索PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science和Embase,以及灰色文献来源(1990年1月- 2025年6月),以确定FEA研究比较至少两种基于改进制剂分类的制剂设计。使用定制表格提取数据,并使用ROBFEAD工具评估偏倚风险。(普洛斯彼罗:CRD420251127762)。结果:9576项研究中,34项被纳入。在贴面和骨水泥层中,切牙和颈椎区域的应力集中最多,而牙结构中颈椎区域的应力集中最多。加载角度越大,应力值越大。没有切痕复位的制剂通常显示出与切痕复位相当或更大的应力值。带有腭倒角的设计经常在腭区显示额外的应力集中。结论:制备设计和加载角度影响单板修复体的应力分布规律;然而,没有一种设计在所有条件下都能始终如一地表现出优异的生物力学性能。建议进一步标准化的有限元分析研究,明确合理的建模假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features. The range of topics covered in the journal includes: - Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts - Implants - Conservative adhesive restorations - Tooth Whitening - Prosthodontic materials and techniques - Dental materials - Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics - Esthetics related research - Innovations in esthetics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书