Impact of Reference Gene Choice on Accurate Gene Expression Analysis Under Emerging Contaminant Exposure.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Kavita Kumari, Md Aftabuddin, Subir Kumar Nag, Soma Das Sarkar, Shubhadeep Ghosh, Basanta Kumar Das
{"title":"Impact of Reference Gene Choice on Accurate Gene Expression Analysis Under Emerging Contaminant Exposure.","authors":"Kavita Kumari, Md Aftabuddin, Subir Kumar Nag, Soma Das Sarkar, Shubhadeep Ghosh, Basanta Kumar Das","doi":"10.1002/tox.70198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate interpretation of gene expression in organisms exposed to emerging contaminants (ECs) requires reliable normalization using stable reference genes. In this study, six candidate housekeeping genes (EEF1A1, GAPDH, ACTB, TBP, RAG1, and PKM) were evaluated in fish (Labeo catla) liver under exposure to chlorpyrifos, triclosan, and oxytetracycline. Expression stability was assessed using geNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper, and the ΔC<sub>t</sub> method, with RefFinder providing an integrated ranking. EEF1A1 consistently showed the highest stability, whereas PKM and RAG1 were the least reliable. Normalization of the xenobiotic response gene CYP1A1 with stable (EEF1A1) versus unstable (PKM, RAG1) genes revealed that inappropriate reference gene choice produced misleading expression profiles. These results highlight the critical importance of empirical reference gene validation for accurate qRT-PCR-based gene expression analysis, particularly in ecotoxicological studies involving exposure to complex mixtures of contaminants.</p>","PeriodicalId":11756,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.70198","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate interpretation of gene expression in organisms exposed to emerging contaminants (ECs) requires reliable normalization using stable reference genes. In this study, six candidate housekeeping genes (EEF1A1, GAPDH, ACTB, TBP, RAG1, and PKM) were evaluated in fish (Labeo catla) liver under exposure to chlorpyrifos, triclosan, and oxytetracycline. Expression stability was assessed using geNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper, and the ΔCt method, with RefFinder providing an integrated ranking. EEF1A1 consistently showed the highest stability, whereas PKM and RAG1 were the least reliable. Normalization of the xenobiotic response gene CYP1A1 with stable (EEF1A1) versus unstable (PKM, RAG1) genes revealed that inappropriate reference gene choice produced misleading expression profiles. These results highlight the critical importance of empirical reference gene validation for accurate qRT-PCR-based gene expression analysis, particularly in ecotoxicological studies involving exposure to complex mixtures of contaminants.

新兴污染物暴露下内参基因选择对基因准确表达分析的影响。
在暴露于新出现污染物(ECs)的生物体中准确解释基因表达需要使用稳定的内参基因进行可靠的规范化。在本研究中,研究人员对暴露于毒死蜱、三氯生和土霉素下的鱼(Labeo catla)肝脏中的6个候选内护基因(EEF1A1、GAPDH、ACTB、TBP、RAG1和PKM)进行了评估。使用geNorm、NormFinder、BestKeeper和ΔCt方法评估表达稳定性,RefFinder提供综合排名。EEF1A1的稳定性最高,而PKM和RAG1的可靠性最低。将异种反应基因CYP1A1与稳定基因(EEF1A1)和不稳定基因(PKM、RAG1)进行归一化,发现不适当的内参基因选择会产生误导的表达谱。这些结果强调了经验参考基因验证对于精确的基于qrt - pcr的基因表达分析的重要性,特别是在涉及暴露于复杂污染物混合物的生态毒理学研究中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Toxicology
Environmental Toxicology 环境科学-毒理学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.90%
发文量
261
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: The journal publishes in the areas of toxicity and toxicology of environmental pollutants in air, dust, sediment, soil and water, and natural toxins in the environment.Of particular interest are: Toxic or biologically disruptive impacts of anthropogenic chemicals such as pharmaceuticals, industrial organics, agricultural chemicals, and by-products such as chlorinated compounds from water disinfection and waste incineration; Natural toxins and their impacts; Biotransformation and metabolism of toxigenic compounds, food chains for toxin accumulation or biodegradation; Assays of toxicity, endocrine disruption, mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, ecosystem impact and health hazard; Environmental and public health risk assessment, environmental guidelines, environmental policy for toxicants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书