THC Labeling Discrepancies Across Cannabis Flower Product Subtypes in a State-Legal Market.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Tylor M Savage, Marco Ortiz Torres, Jonathon K Lisano, Carillon J Skrzynski, L Cinnamon Bidwell, Duncan I Mackie
{"title":"THC Labeling Discrepancies Across Cannabis Flower Product Subtypes in a State-Legal Market.","authors":"Tylor M Savage, Marco Ortiz Torres, Jonathon K Lisano, Carillon J Skrzynski, L Cinnamon Bidwell, Duncan I Mackie","doi":"10.1177/25785125261489482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>High-concentration delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) products, with limited research, are becoming accessible in a rapidly expanding cannabis market. There is concern about poor labeling accuracy for THC in recreationally available cannabis, which could impact public health and consumer safety. However, coarse and fine-grained data representative of the scope of legal-market cannabis products have not been reported. This project aimed to investigate THC labeling discrepancies in recreational cannabis flower products and extend examinations to the accuracy of representative cannabis flower subtypes commonly available in a state-legal market.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Products were purchased between November 2022 and March 2025 from 59 licensed dispensaries across Colorado and analyzed for discrepancies in labeled versus observed THC concentration (%). Cannabis flower products (<i>N</i> = 265) were included and further divided into pre-pack (<i>n</i> = 76), pre-roll (<i>n</i> = 27), re-pack (<i>n</i> = 55), and deli (<i>n</i> = 107) subtypes. Based on regulatory guidelines, product accuracy was determined by evaluating whether observed THC concentration (%) was within ± 15% of labeled THC concentration (%), and was further evaluated by product subtype.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Half (51.7%) of the flower products sampled were accurately labeled. Labeling accuracy (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>(6) = 15.15, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and the percent deviation from labeled THC concentration (%) (H = 14.3, <i>p</i> < 0.001) depended on product subtype. <i>Post hoc</i> comparisons for product accuracy indicated that pre-roll products were more likely to be over-labeled (59.3%), and re-pack products had the greatest proportions of mislabeled products that were over-labeled (96.0%). Furthermore, <i>post hoc</i> comparisons indicated that pre-roll products had the greatest deviation from labeled THC concentration (19.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consistent with previous findings, recreational flower products were inaccurately labeled for THC. While all flower product subtypes demonstrated low labeling accuracy, it was observed that products subject to greater handling by dispensaries (i.e., pre-roll and re-pack) were more prone to THC over-labeling inaccuracies. Future research should explore how these findings impact consumer trust, consumption, and purchasing habits.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":"25785125261489482"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25785125261489482","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: High-concentration delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) products, with limited research, are becoming accessible in a rapidly expanding cannabis market. There is concern about poor labeling accuracy for THC in recreationally available cannabis, which could impact public health and consumer safety. However, coarse and fine-grained data representative of the scope of legal-market cannabis products have not been reported. This project aimed to investigate THC labeling discrepancies in recreational cannabis flower products and extend examinations to the accuracy of representative cannabis flower subtypes commonly available in a state-legal market.

Materials and methods: Products were purchased between November 2022 and March 2025 from 59 licensed dispensaries across Colorado and analyzed for discrepancies in labeled versus observed THC concentration (%). Cannabis flower products (N = 265) were included and further divided into pre-pack (n = 76), pre-roll (n = 27), re-pack (n = 55), and deli (n = 107) subtypes. Based on regulatory guidelines, product accuracy was determined by evaluating whether observed THC concentration (%) was within ± 15% of labeled THC concentration (%), and was further evaluated by product subtype.

Results: Half (51.7%) of the flower products sampled were accurately labeled. Labeling accuracy (χ2(6) = 15.15, p = 0.02) and the percent deviation from labeled THC concentration (%) (H = 14.3, p < 0.001) depended on product subtype. Post hoc comparisons for product accuracy indicated that pre-roll products were more likely to be over-labeled (59.3%), and re-pack products had the greatest proportions of mislabeled products that were over-labeled (96.0%). Furthermore, post hoc comparisons indicated that pre-roll products had the greatest deviation from labeled THC concentration (19.6%).

Conclusion: Consistent with previous findings, recreational flower products were inaccurately labeled for THC. While all flower product subtypes demonstrated low labeling accuracy, it was observed that products subject to greater handling by dispensaries (i.e., pre-roll and re-pack) were more prone to THC over-labeling inaccuracies. Future research should explore how these findings impact consumer trust, consumption, and purchasing habits.

国家合法市场中大麻花产品亚型的四氢大麻酚标签差异。
导读:高浓度δ -9-四氢大麻酚(THC)产品在研究有限的情况下,正在迅速扩大的大麻市场上变得容易获得。人们担心娱乐性大麻中四氢大麻酚的标签准确性不高,这可能影响公众健康和消费者安全。然而,代表合法市场大麻产品范围的粗粒度和细粒度数据尚未报告。该项目旨在调查休闲大麻花产品中四氢大麻酚的标签差异,并将检查扩展到国家合法市场中常见的代表性大麻花亚型的准确性。材料和方法:产品于2022年11月至2025年3月期间从科罗拉多州的59家持牌药房购买,并分析标签与观察到的四氢大麻酚浓度(%)的差异。纳入大麻花产品(N = 265),并进一步分为预包装(N = 76)、预卷(N = 27)、再包装(N = 55)和熟食(N = 107)亚型。根据监管指南,通过评估观察到的THC浓度(%)是否在标记THC浓度(%)的±15%以内来确定产品的准确性,并进一步按产品亚型进行评估。结果:半数(51.7%)的花卉产品标记准确。标记准确度(χ2(6) = 15.15, p = 0.02)和标记THC浓度偏差百分比(H = 14.3, p < 0.001)与产品亚型相关。事后比较产品的准确性表明,预卷产品更有可能被过度标签(59.3%),重新包装产品有最大比例的错误标签的产品,被过度标签(96.0%)。此外,事后比较表明,卷前产品与标记的四氢大麻酚浓度偏差最大(19.6%)。结论:与先前的研究结果一致,娱乐性花卉产品的四氢大麻酚标签不准确。虽然所有花卉产品亚型的标签准确性较低,但观察到药房处理较多的产品(即预卷和重新包装)更容易出现四氢大麻酚过度标签不准确。未来的研究应该探索这些发现如何影响消费者的信任、消费和购买习惯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
164
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书