Epidemiology and treatment outcomes of bone and soft tissue sarcoma in pediatric and adolescent and young adult patients in Japan: data from population-based National Cancer Registry 2016-2019.
{"title":"Epidemiology and treatment outcomes of bone and soft tissue sarcoma in pediatric and adolescent and young adult patients in Japan: data from population-based National Cancer Registry 2016-2019.","authors":"Yu Toda, Koichi Ogura, Chigusa Morizane, Tomoyuki Satake, Shintaro Iwata, Eisuke Kobayashi, Toshiyuki Takemori, Hiroya Kondo, Shudai Muramatsu, Takahiro Higashi, Akira Kawai","doi":"10.1080/07357907.2026.2723355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This Japanese population-based retrospective study using National Cancer Registry data (2016-2019) revealed age-specific disparities in treatment and outcomes of bone and soft tissue sarcomas in patients under 40 years. A total of 1,209 bone sarcoma (BS) and 3,096 soft tissue sarcoma (STS) cases were analyzed for demographics, treatment modalities, survival rates, and prognostic factors. Osteosarcoma (53%) and Ewing sarcoma (15%) were the most common BS subtypes. Pediatric patients presented more frequently with metastases and received more chemotherapy, while surgery was performed in 80% of BS cases. For STS, fibrosarcoma (19%) and rhabdomyosarcoma (13%) predominated. AYA (adolescent and young adult) patients underwent more surgeries, whereas pediatric patients received more chemotherapy/radiotherapy. Three-year overall survival rates were 67% for BS and 79% for STS. Prognosis was significantly influenced by disease extent and surgical intervention. Age was an adverse prognostic factor for STS but not for BS. This first comprehensive Japanese population-based study demonstrates treatment disparities across age groups in sarcoma care. We revealed that pediatric and AYA sarcoma care in Japan shows clear age-related disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":9463,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07357907.2026.2723355","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This Japanese population-based retrospective study using National Cancer Registry data (2016-2019) revealed age-specific disparities in treatment and outcomes of bone and soft tissue sarcomas in patients under 40 years. A total of 1,209 bone sarcoma (BS) and 3,096 soft tissue sarcoma (STS) cases were analyzed for demographics, treatment modalities, survival rates, and prognostic factors. Osteosarcoma (53%) and Ewing sarcoma (15%) were the most common BS subtypes. Pediatric patients presented more frequently with metastases and received more chemotherapy, while surgery was performed in 80% of BS cases. For STS, fibrosarcoma (19%) and rhabdomyosarcoma (13%) predominated. AYA (adolescent and young adult) patients underwent more surgeries, whereas pediatric patients received more chemotherapy/radiotherapy. Three-year overall survival rates were 67% for BS and 79% for STS. Prognosis was significantly influenced by disease extent and surgical intervention. Age was an adverse prognostic factor for STS but not for BS. This first comprehensive Japanese population-based study demonstrates treatment disparities across age groups in sarcoma care. We revealed that pediatric and AYA sarcoma care in Japan shows clear age-related disparities.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Investigation is one of the most highly regarded and recognized journals in the field of basic and clinical oncology. It is designed to give physicians a comprehensive resource on the current state of progress in the cancer field as well as a broad background of reliable information necessary for effective decision making. In addition to presenting original papers of fundamental significance, it also publishes reviews, essays, specialized presentations of controversies, considerations of new technologies and their applications to specific laboratory problems, discussions of public issues, miniseries on major topics, new and experimental drugs and therapies, and an innovative letters to the editor section. One of the unique features of the journal is its departmentalized editorial sections reporting on more than 30 subject categories covering the broad spectrum of specialized areas that together comprise the field of oncology. Edited by leading physicians and research scientists, these sections make Cancer Investigation the prime resource for clinicians seeking to make sense of the sometimes-overwhelming amount of information available throughout the field. In addition to its peer-reviewed clinical research, the journal also features translational studies that bridge the gap between the laboratory and the clinic.