The fundamental attribution error as Institutional Stance neglect.

IF 8.2 1区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Kyle G Ratner, Diego Padilla-Garcia, Qianqian L Cui, Mariana Torres
{"title":"The fundamental attribution error as Institutional Stance neglect.","authors":"Kyle G Ratner, Diego Padilla-Garcia, Qianqian L Cui, Mariana Torres","doi":"10.1017/S0140525X26105652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social psychology tells us that perceivers tend to prioritize person-based explanations of behavior and fail to recognize the causal influence of social roles and other situational information. This cognitive bias seems to occur automatically but cultural factors matter. We explain the relevance of landmark social psychology contributions for understanding the Institutional Stance and its interplay with the Mentalistic Stance.</p>","PeriodicalId":8698,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","volume":"49 ","pages":"e384"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X26105652","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social psychology tells us that perceivers tend to prioritize person-based explanations of behavior and fail to recognize the causal influence of social roles and other situational information. This cognitive bias seems to occur automatically but cultural factors matter. We explain the relevance of landmark social psychology contributions for understanding the Institutional Stance and its interplay with the Mentalistic Stance.

基本归因错误为制度立场忽视。
社会心理学告诉我们,感知者倾向于优先考虑基于个人的行为解释,而未能认识到社会角色和其他情境信息的因果影响。这种认知偏差似乎是自动产生的,但文化因素很重要。我们解释了具有里程碑意义的社会心理学贡献与理解制度立场及其与心理立场的相互作用的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
1.70%
发文量
353
期刊介绍: Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) is a highly respected journal that employs an innovative approach called Open Peer Commentary. This format allows for the publication of noteworthy and contentious research from various fields including psychology, neuroscience, behavioral biology, and cognitive science. Each article is accompanied by 20-40 commentaries from experts across these disciplines, as well as a response from the author themselves. This unique setup creates a captivating forum for the exchange of ideas, critical analysis, and the integration of research within the behavioral and brain sciences, spanning topics from molecular neurobiology and artificial intelligence to the philosophy of the mind.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书