Where IS the ought? The Institutional Stance lacks normative force.

IF 8.2 1区心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES

Behavioral and Brain Sciences Pub Date : 2026-09-18 DOI:10.1017/S0140525X26105597

Lucas Payne Butler, Marco F H Schmidt

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Institutional Stance (IS) offers a promising account of how humans navigate institutional structures, but it suffers from a problem inherent in purely third-person frameworks: a detached observer can predict behavior aligned with institutional expectations, but cannot feel the binding grip of normative force. We propose reconceptualizing the IS as an important aspect of social cognition rooted in shared intentionality.

查看原文本刊更多论文

应该在哪里？制度立场缺乏规范力量。

制度立场（IS）提供了一个关于人类如何驾驭制度结构的有希望的解释，但它受到纯粹第三人称框架固有的问题的困扰：一个超然的观察者可以预测与制度期望一致的行为，但无法感受到规范力量的约束。我们建议将信息系统重新定义为植根于共同意向性的社会认知的一个重要方面。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 医学-行为科学

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

1.70%

发文量

353

期刊介绍： Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) is a highly respected journal that employs an innovative approach called Open Peer Commentary. This format allows for the publication of noteworthy and contentious research from various fields including psychology, neuroscience, behavioral biology, and cognitive science. Each article is accompanied by 20-40 commentaries from experts across these disciplines, as well as a response from the author themselves. This unique setup creates a captivating forum for the exchange of ideas, critical analysis, and the integration of research within the behavioral and brain sciences, spanning topics from molecular neurobiology and artificial intelligence to the philosophy of the mind.