To Explore the Effects of Multidisciplinary Collaborative Nursing on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Skull Defect Repair.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Yifan Chen, Linglin Yao
{"title":"To Explore the Effects of Multidisciplinary Collaborative Nursing on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Skull Defect Repair.","authors":"Yifan Chen, Linglin Yao","doi":"10.62713/aic.4697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the effects of the multidisciplinary collaborative nursing model on neurological function, cognitive function, depressive symptoms, and quality of life in patients with cranioplasty (i.e., surgical repair of skull defects).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center retrospective study. A total of 101 patients who underwent skull defect repair at The First People's Hospital of Jiashan from June 2022 to November 2025 were selected as the study population. Patients were divided into two groups based on sequential temporal cohorts: those treated before the implementation of the multidisciplinary collaborative nursing protocol (June 2022 to October 2023) were designated as the control group (n = 54), whereas those treated after its hospital-wide implementation (November 2023 to November 2025) served as the observation group (n = 47). The control group received routine nursing, while the observation group received multidisciplinary collaborative nursing, including multidisciplinary team formation, preoperative psychological counseling and rehabilitation guidance, postoperative rehabilitation training, dynamic assessment of psychological status, and continuous nursing guidance after discharge. Neurological function, cognitive function, anxiety/depression, and self-care ability were assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Activities of Daily Living (ADL), respectively. Quality of life was measured with the General Quality of Life Inventory-74 (GQOLI-74), and postoperative complications were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before the intervention, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in any of the measured indices (<i>p</i> > 0.05). After the intervention, both groups demonstrated improvement in neurological and cognitive function, as well as reductions in anxiety and depression scores; however, the observation group showed significantly greater improvements compared with the control group. The observation group showed significantly lower NIHSS scores than the control group (<i>p</i> = 0.02), along with significantly higher MMSE scores (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Both HADS-A (<i>p</i> < 0.01) and HADS-D scores (<i>p</i> < 0.05) were significantly reduced in the observation group compared with the control group. The ADL score of the observation group was also significantly higher than that of the control group (<i>p</i> = 0.01). Regarding quality of life, the observation group demonstrated significantly higher scores in the psychological (<i>p</i> < 0.01), social (<i>p</i> = 0.03), and physical dimensions (<i>p</i> < 0.01), while no significant difference was found in the material dimension (<i>p</i> = 0.30). Furthermore, the overall complication rate was significantly lower in the observation group (<i>p</i> = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multidisciplinary collaborative nursing markedly improves neurological and cognitive function in patients undergoing skull defect repair, effectively alleviates anxiety and depression, enhances daily living self-care ability and quality of life, and reduces the incidence of postoperative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":8210,"journal":{"name":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","volume":"97 9","pages":"1607-1614"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.4697","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To explore the effects of the multidisciplinary collaborative nursing model on neurological function, cognitive function, depressive symptoms, and quality of life in patients with cranioplasty (i.e., surgical repair of skull defects).

Methods: This is a single-center retrospective study. A total of 101 patients who underwent skull defect repair at The First People's Hospital of Jiashan from June 2022 to November 2025 were selected as the study population. Patients were divided into two groups based on sequential temporal cohorts: those treated before the implementation of the multidisciplinary collaborative nursing protocol (June 2022 to October 2023) were designated as the control group (n = 54), whereas those treated after its hospital-wide implementation (November 2023 to November 2025) served as the observation group (n = 47). The control group received routine nursing, while the observation group received multidisciplinary collaborative nursing, including multidisciplinary team formation, preoperative psychological counseling and rehabilitation guidance, postoperative rehabilitation training, dynamic assessment of psychological status, and continuous nursing guidance after discharge. Neurological function, cognitive function, anxiety/depression, and self-care ability were assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Activities of Daily Living (ADL), respectively. Quality of life was measured with the General Quality of Life Inventory-74 (GQOLI-74), and postoperative complications were documented.

Results: Before the intervention, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in any of the measured indices (p > 0.05). After the intervention, both groups demonstrated improvement in neurological and cognitive function, as well as reductions in anxiety and depression scores; however, the observation group showed significantly greater improvements compared with the control group. The observation group showed significantly lower NIHSS scores than the control group (p = 0.02), along with significantly higher MMSE scores (p < 0.01). Both HADS-A (p < 0.01) and HADS-D scores (p < 0.05) were significantly reduced in the observation group compared with the control group. The ADL score of the observation group was also significantly higher than that of the control group (p = 0.01). Regarding quality of life, the observation group demonstrated significantly higher scores in the psychological (p < 0.01), social (p = 0.03), and physical dimensions (p < 0.01), while no significant difference was found in the material dimension (p = 0.30). Furthermore, the overall complication rate was significantly lower in the observation group (p = 0.04).

Conclusions: Multidisciplinary collaborative nursing markedly improves neurological and cognitive function in patients undergoing skull defect repair, effectively alleviates anxiety and depression, enhances daily living self-care ability and quality of life, and reduces the incidence of postoperative complications.

探讨多学科协同护理对颅骨缺损修复患者临床效果的影响。
目的:探讨多学科协同护理模式对颅骨成形术(即颅骨缺损手术修复)患者神经功能、认知功能、抑郁症状及生活质量的影响。方法:这是一项单中心回顾性研究。选取2022年6月至2025年11月在嘉善市第一人民医院行颅骨缺损修复术的101例患者作为研究人群。根据时序时间队列将患者分为两组:在实施多学科协同护理方案之前(2022年6月至2023年10月)接受治疗的患者为对照组(n = 54),而在全院范围内实施后(2023年11月至2025年11月)接受治疗的患者为观察组(n = 47)。对照组采用常规护理,观察组采用多学科协同护理,包括多学科团队组建、术前心理咨询与康复指导、术后康复训练、心理状态动态评估、出院后持续护理指导。分别采用美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)、简易精神状态检查量表(MMSE)、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)和日常生活活动量表(ADL)对患者的神经功能、认知功能、焦虑/抑郁和自我护理能力进行评估。采用一般生活质量量表-74 (GQOLI-74)测量患者的生活质量,并记录术后并发症。结果:干预前,两组患者各项指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。干预后,两组患者的神经和认知功能均有所改善,焦虑和抑郁评分也有所降低;然而,与对照组相比,观察组表现出明显更大的改善。观察组患者NIHSS评分显著低于对照组(p = 0.02), MMSE评分显著高于对照组(p < 0.01)。观察组患者HADS-A评分(p < 0.01)和HADS-D评分(p < 0.05)均较对照组显著降低。观察组患者ADL评分也显著高于对照组(p = 0.01)。在生活质量方面,观察组在心理维度(p < 0.01)、社交维度(p = 0.03)、身体维度(p < 0.01)得分显著高于对照组,而在物质维度(p = 0.30)得分差异无统计学意义。观察组总并发症发生率明显低于对照组(p = 0.04)。结论:多学科协同护理可显著改善颅骨缺损修复患者的神经和认知功能,有效缓解患者的焦虑和抑郁情绪,提高日常生活自理能力和生活质量,减少术后并发症的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali Italiani di Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal and covers all aspects of surgery:elective, emergency and experimental surgery, as well as problems involving technology, teaching, organization and forensic medicine. The articles are published in Italian or English, though English is preferred because it facilitates the international diffusion of the journal (v.Guidelines for Authors and Norme per gli Autori). The articles published are divided into three main sections:editorials, original articles, and case reports and innovations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书