Interpreting and reimagining social kinds using the institutional stance?

IF 8.2 1区心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES

Behavioral and Brain Sciences Pub Date : 2026-09-18 DOI:10.1017/S0140525X26105573

Katherine Ritchie

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Jara-Ettinger and Dunham argue that the institutional stance is used to interpret the behavior of individuals and represent alternative structures. While they focus on roles like barista, they argue that the stance also applies to kinds like race and gender. I argue that there are several differences suggesting this is incorrect, or at least not yet supported by their arguments.

查看原文本刊更多论文

用制度立场来解释和重新想象社会类型？

Jara-Ettinger和Dunham认为，制度立场是用来解释个人的行为和代表替代结构的。虽然他们关注的是咖啡师这样的角色，但他们认为，这种立场也适用于种族和性别等类别。我认为，有几个差异表明这是不正确的，或者至少还没有得到他们的论点的支持。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 医学-行为科学

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

1.70%

发文量

353

期刊介绍： Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) is a highly respected journal that employs an innovative approach called Open Peer Commentary. This format allows for the publication of noteworthy and contentious research from various fields including psychology, neuroscience, behavioral biology, and cognitive science. Each article is accompanied by 20-40 commentaries from experts across these disciplines, as well as a response from the author themselves. This unique setup creates a captivating forum for the exchange of ideas, critical analysis, and the integration of research within the behavioral and brain sciences, spanning topics from molecular neurobiology and artificial intelligence to the philosophy of the mind.