{"title":"Live Attenuated Vaccines for African Swine Fever: Perspectives on Their Use and Strategic Directions","authors":"Nguyen Van Diep, Pham Ngoc Doanh","doi":"10.1155/tbed/2020820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>African swine fever (ASF) continues to cause substantial economic and production losses in affected countries. Although biosecurity and conventional control measures remain essential, the challenges of ASF control underscore the need for safe and effective vaccines as additional tools, particularly in endemic settings. Live attenuated vaccines (LAVs) are the most advanced ASF vaccine platform, providing the most consistent protection to date and remaining the only ASF vaccines to reach commercial deployment. Field experience with licensed products has shown encouraging safety, immunogenicity, and disease-control outcomes. However, the introduction and spread of recombinant genotype I/II strains may reduce vaccine effectiveness and contribute to limited vaccine uptake. Together with the detection of vaccine-like variants of uncertain origin, these issues have generated contrasting perspectives: a precautionary view focused on risks associated with replication-competent vaccine viruses, and a benefit–risk view emphasizing the consequences of continued ASFV circulation without effective vaccination. This review contrasts these perspectives, draws lessons from other live vaccines, and frames the responsible use of ASF LAVs within a benefit–risk approach. Experience with human and veterinary LAVs shows that persistence, transmission, genetic instability, reversion to virulence, and recombination are inherent biosafety concerns of LAVs, yet such vaccines remain important when alternative platforms do not provide equivalent protection. Their use therefore requires identifying, monitoring and minimizing residual risks in relation to expected benefits. Accordingly, ASF LAVs should be avoided in ASF-free regions but may be justified in endemic settings when licensed products are used within coordinated programs integrating adequate coverage, biosecurity, surveillance, and molecular monitoring. Future vaccine development should focus on improving safety in growing pigs and breeding animals, broadening protection against emerging ASFV strains, validating DIVA tools and developing safer next-generation platforms, while continued reassessment ensures that vaccine use remains appropriate to epidemiological conditions, emerging evidence, and disease-control needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":234,"journal":{"name":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/tbed/2020820","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/tbed/2020820","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
African swine fever (ASF) continues to cause substantial economic and production losses in affected countries. Although biosecurity and conventional control measures remain essential, the challenges of ASF control underscore the need for safe and effective vaccines as additional tools, particularly in endemic settings. Live attenuated vaccines (LAVs) are the most advanced ASF vaccine platform, providing the most consistent protection to date and remaining the only ASF vaccines to reach commercial deployment. Field experience with licensed products has shown encouraging safety, immunogenicity, and disease-control outcomes. However, the introduction and spread of recombinant genotype I/II strains may reduce vaccine effectiveness and contribute to limited vaccine uptake. Together with the detection of vaccine-like variants of uncertain origin, these issues have generated contrasting perspectives: a precautionary view focused on risks associated with replication-competent vaccine viruses, and a benefit–risk view emphasizing the consequences of continued ASFV circulation without effective vaccination. This review contrasts these perspectives, draws lessons from other live vaccines, and frames the responsible use of ASF LAVs within a benefit–risk approach. Experience with human and veterinary LAVs shows that persistence, transmission, genetic instability, reversion to virulence, and recombination are inherent biosafety concerns of LAVs, yet such vaccines remain important when alternative platforms do not provide equivalent protection. Their use therefore requires identifying, monitoring and minimizing residual risks in relation to expected benefits. Accordingly, ASF LAVs should be avoided in ASF-free regions but may be justified in endemic settings when licensed products are used within coordinated programs integrating adequate coverage, biosecurity, surveillance, and molecular monitoring. Future vaccine development should focus on improving safety in growing pigs and breeding animals, broadening protection against emerging ASFV strains, validating DIVA tools and developing safer next-generation platforms, while continued reassessment ensures that vaccine use remains appropriate to epidemiological conditions, emerging evidence, and disease-control needs.
期刊介绍:
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases brings together in one place the latest research on infectious diseases considered to hold the greatest economic threat to animals and humans worldwide. The journal provides a venue for global research on their diagnosis, prevention and management, and for papers on public health, pathogenesis, epidemiology, statistical modeling, diagnostics, biosecurity issues, genomics, vaccine development and rapid communication of new outbreaks. Papers should include timely research approaches using state-of-the-art technologies. The editors encourage papers adopting a science-based approach on socio-economic and environmental factors influencing the management of the bio-security threat posed by these diseases, including risk analysis and disease spread modeling. Preference will be given to communications focusing on novel science-based approaches to controlling transboundary and emerging diseases. The following topics are generally considered out-of-scope, but decisions are made on a case-by-case basis (for example, studies on cryptic wildlife populations, and those on potential species extinctions):
Pathogen discovery: a common pathogen newly recognised in a specific country, or a new pathogen or genetic sequence for which there is little context about — or insights regarding — its emergence or spread.
Prevalence estimation surveys and risk factor studies based on survey (rather than longitudinal) methodology, except when such studies are unique. Surveys of knowledge, attitudes and practices are within scope.
Diagnostic test development if not accompanied by robust sensitivity and specificity estimation from field studies.
Studies focused only on laboratory methods in which relevance to disease emergence and spread is not obvious or can not be inferred (“pure research” type studies).
Narrative literature reviews which do not generate new knowledge. Systematic and scoping reviews, and meta-analyses are within scope.