Improved impact from the use of beneficial natural enemy species in Australian canola systems: challenges and required tools

IF 4.2 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Pest Management Science Pub Date : 2026-10-14 Epub Date: 2026-09-17 DOI:10.1002/ps.71291
Sarina Macfadyen, Basman Al-Jalely, Mukti Chalise, Maryam Ehsangar, Zorica Duric, Joanne Holloway, Andrew Hulthen, Precious Mavende, Paul Melloy, Svetlana Micic, Hazel Parry, Shovon Chandra Sarkar, Jessa Thurman, Maarten Van Helden, Xiaobei Wang, Wei Xu
{"title":"Improved impact from the use of beneficial natural enemy species in Australian canola systems: challenges and required tools","authors":"Sarina Macfadyen,&nbsp;Basman Al-Jalely,&nbsp;Mukti Chalise,&nbsp;Maryam Ehsangar,&nbsp;Zorica Duric,&nbsp;Joanne Holloway,&nbsp;Andrew Hulthen,&nbsp;Precious Mavende,&nbsp;Paul Melloy,&nbsp;Svetlana Micic,&nbsp;Hazel Parry,&nbsp;Shovon Chandra Sarkar,&nbsp;Jessa Thurman,&nbsp;Maarten Van Helden,&nbsp;Xiaobei Wang,&nbsp;Wei Xu","doi":"10.1002/ps.71291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The concept of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) has developed into a practical framework for sustainable pest management and is widely adopted in modern farming systems. Beneficial arthropods (natural enemies, such as predators and parasitoids) have shown potential for use in pest management, leading to observable production benefits. However, using beneficials is perhaps the most challenging IPM component to adopt at scale and in Australian canola systems, adoption remains low. Here we consider the challenges for measuring impact from beneficials in a way that links to production benefits for growers. To get an industry perspective, we surveyed canola growers and their advisors to understand their constraints and priorities for using beneficials for improved pest management. There were few practices to support and conserve beneficials adopted at scale (use of selective insecticides was the most used practice), and significant knowledge gaps about what impacts growers were likely to see if certain practices were to be adopted. Despite these knowledge gaps, canola growers and their advisors aspired towards more active management of beneficials. From our synthesis, we outline the new tools that are needed, designed specifically for beneficials, and present a pathway forward to enable the greater use of beneficials. We suggest that incremental steps are required for proactive transitions rather than whole-system shifts driven by industry crises. © 2026 Commonwealth of Australia. <i>Pest Management Science</i> published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":218,"journal":{"name":"Pest Management Science","volume":"82 11","pages":"10540-10550"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ps.71291","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pest Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ps.71291","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) has developed into a practical framework for sustainable pest management and is widely adopted in modern farming systems. Beneficial arthropods (natural enemies, such as predators and parasitoids) have shown potential for use in pest management, leading to observable production benefits. However, using beneficials is perhaps the most challenging IPM component to adopt at scale and in Australian canola systems, adoption remains low. Here we consider the challenges for measuring impact from beneficials in a way that links to production benefits for growers. To get an industry perspective, we surveyed canola growers and their advisors to understand their constraints and priorities for using beneficials for improved pest management. There were few practices to support and conserve beneficials adopted at scale (use of selective insecticides was the most used practice), and significant knowledge gaps about what impacts growers were likely to see if certain practices were to be adopted. Despite these knowledge gaps, canola growers and their advisors aspired towards more active management of beneficials. From our synthesis, we outline the new tools that are needed, designed specifically for beneficials, and present a pathway forward to enable the greater use of beneficials. We suggest that incremental steps are required for proactive transitions rather than whole-system shifts driven by industry crises. © 2026 Commonwealth of Australia. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

在澳大利亚油菜籽系统中使用有益天敌物种改善影响:挑战和所需工具。
有害生物综合管理(IPM)的概念已发展成为可持续有害生物管理的实用框架,并在现代农业系统中得到广泛采用。有益节肢动物(天敌,如捕食者和拟寄生物)已显示出在病虫害管理中使用的潜力,从而带来可观察到的生产效益。然而,使用有益成分可能是最具挑战性的IPM成分,在澳大利亚油菜籽系统中,采用率仍然很低。在这里,我们考虑以一种与种植者的生产效益相联系的方式衡量受益者影响的挑战。为了获得一个行业视角,我们调查了油菜籽种植者和他们的顾问,以了解他们的限制和优先事项,使用有益的改善病虫害管理。支持和保护大规模采用的有益作物的做法很少(使用选择性杀虫剂是最常用的做法),而且,如果采用某些做法,种植者可能会看到什么影响,这方面的知识差距很大。尽管存在这些知识差距,油菜籽种植者和他们的顾问仍希望对受益者进行更积极的管理。从我们的综合中,我们概述了所需的新工具,专门为受益人设计的,并提出了一个途径,以使更多地使用受益人。我们建议,主动转型需要循序渐进的步骤,而不是由行业危机驱动的整个系统转型。©2026澳大利亚联邦。由John Wiley & Sons Ltd代表化学工业协会出版的《害虫管理科学》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pest Management Science
Pest Management Science 农林科学-昆虫学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
9.80%
发文量
553
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Pest Management Science is the international journal of research and development in crop protection and pest control. Since its launch in 1970, the journal has become the premier forum for papers on the discovery, application, and impact on the environment of products and strategies designed for pest management. Published for SCI by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书