Resilience and Overload in Caregivers of Dependent Persons: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 2.1
Faustino Andrés-Pérez, Lluna Maria Bru-Luna, Sergio Hidalgo-Fuentes, Manuel Martí-Vilar
{"title":"Resilience and Overload in Caregivers of Dependent Persons: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Faustino Andrés-Pérez,&nbsp;Lluna Maria Bru-Luna,&nbsp;Sergio Hidalgo-Fuentes,&nbsp;Manuel Martí-Vilar","doi":"10.1007/s42844-026-00245-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The burden associated with caring for people with disabilities or other dependency conditions is a significant public health issue that affects informal and formal caregivers, generating negative physical, emotional, and social impacts. In light of this situation, resilience has been identified as a protective factor that reduces the negative impact of prolonged caregiving in contexts related to disability and dependency. The objective of this research was to systematically analyze the relationship between resilience and overload, quantifying the magnitude of this relationship through a meta-analysis. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. A systematic search was conducted in Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Dialnet, and quantitative studies reporting correlations between resilience and caregiver burden were included. Thirty-two studies that met the eligibility criteria were included. The meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model, which resulted in a significantly negative correlation, indicating that high levels of resilience are associated with low levels of overload among caregivers of dependent persons (<i>r</i> = -.39, 95% CI [-.46, -.32]; I<sup>2</sup> = 93.55%). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the stability of the results, and Egger's and Begg's tests ruled out the existence of publication bias. Although heterogeneity was high, moderation analyses did not identify any significant explanatory variables. In conclusion, the results confirm that resilience is an essential resource for coping with the demands of caregiving associated with dependency. Strengthening resilience is a key strategy for reducing overload and promoting the sustainability of care in disability and health contexts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72113,"journal":{"name":"Adversity and resilience science","volume":"7 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adversity and resilience science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42844-026-00245-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The burden associated with caring for people with disabilities or other dependency conditions is a significant public health issue that affects informal and formal caregivers, generating negative physical, emotional, and social impacts. In light of this situation, resilience has been identified as a protective factor that reduces the negative impact of prolonged caregiving in contexts related to disability and dependency. The objective of this research was to systematically analyze the relationship between resilience and overload, quantifying the magnitude of this relationship through a meta-analysis. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. A systematic search was conducted in Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Dialnet, and quantitative studies reporting correlations between resilience and caregiver burden were included. Thirty-two studies that met the eligibility criteria were included. The meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model, which resulted in a significantly negative correlation, indicating that high levels of resilience are associated with low levels of overload among caregivers of dependent persons (r = -.39, 95% CI [-.46, -.32]; I2 = 93.55%). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the stability of the results, and Egger's and Begg's tests ruled out the existence of publication bias. Although heterogeneity was high, moderation analyses did not identify any significant explanatory variables. In conclusion, the results confirm that resilience is an essential resource for coping with the demands of caregiving associated with dependency. Strengthening resilience is a key strategy for reducing overload and promoting the sustainability of care in disability and health contexts.

依赖者照顾者的弹性与超载:系统回顾与元分析
与照顾残疾人或其他依赖者有关的负担是一个重大的公共卫生问题,影响到非正式和正式的照料者,产生消极的身体、情感和社会影响。鉴于这种情况,复原力已被确定为一种保护性因素,可以减少与残疾和依赖相关的长期护理的负面影响。本研究的目的是系统地分析弹性和超载之间的关系,并通过荟萃分析量化这种关系的大小。遵循了PRISMA准则。在Web of Science、PubMed、Scopus、ScienceDirect和Dialnet中进行了系统搜索,并纳入了报告心理弹性与照顾者负担之间相关性的定量研究。纳入了32项符合入选标准的研究。采用随机效应模型进行meta分析,结果显示显著负相关,表明受抚养人照顾者的高弹性水平与低超载水平相关(r = - 0.39, 95% CI [- 0.46, - 0.32]; I2 = 93.55%)。敏感性分析证实了结果的稳定性,Egger和Begg的测试排除了发表偏倚的存在。虽然异质性很高,但适度分析没有发现任何显著的解释变量。综上所述,研究结果证实,弹性是应对与依赖相关的照顾需求的重要资源。加强复原力是减少超载和促进残疾和保健方面护理的可持续性的一项关键战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书