Isometric relationship between the proportionality coefficients of the Montgomery and Montgomery–Koyama–Smith equations: Evidence from nine Malus cultivars

IF 2.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY
Trees Pub Date : 2026-09-18 DOI:10.1007/s00468-026-02830-2
Danyu Zhou, Karl J. Niklas, Wangxiang Zhang, Wen Gu, Feixue Jiang, Peijian Shi
{"title":"Isometric relationship between the proportionality coefficients of the Montgomery and Montgomery–Koyama–Smith equations: Evidence from nine Malus cultivars","authors":"Danyu Zhou,&nbsp;Karl J. Niklas,&nbsp;Wangxiang Zhang,&nbsp;Wen Gu,&nbsp;Feixue Jiang,&nbsp;Peijian Shi","doi":"10.1007/s00468-026-02830-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>\n <b><i>Key message</i></b>\n </h3><p><b>There is a robust linear relationship between the proportionality coefficients of the Montgomery and Montgomery–Koyama–Smith equations.</b></p><h3>Abstract</h3><p>The Montgomery equation (ME) assumes a proportional relationship between individual leaf area and the product of leaf length and width, whereas the Montgomery<b>–</b>Koyama<b>–</b>Smith equation (MKSE) assumes a proportional relationship between the total leaf area per shoot and the product of the sum of individual leaf widths and maximum leaf length. Given the developmental homology between petals and leaves, the ME and MKSE are hypothesized to also apply to petal and corolla areas. However, prior studies have neglected the potential link between their respective proportionality coefficients. To validate the ME and MKSE for calculating individual petal area (<i>A</i>) and total corolla area per flower (<i>A</i><sub>T</sub>), and to test the correlation between the ME and MKSE proportionality coefficients (<i>k</i> for ME and <i>k</i><sub>KS</sub> for MKSE), we measured 2700 petals from 540 flowers across nine <i>Malus</i> cultivars. Goodness of fit was assessed using the root-mean-square error (RMSE) and the coefficient of determination (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup>). The ME and MKSE were validated for all nine cultivars, effectively predicting <i>A</i> and <i>A</i><sub>T</sub> with high precision (as gauged by low RMSE and high <i>r</i><sup>2</sup>). Importantly, a statistically significant one-to-one (isometric) scaling relationship was observed between <i>k</i> and <i>k</i><sub>KS</sub>. The isometric relationship between the two proportionality coefficients provides a quantitative link between individual petal geometry and whole-corolla structure, significantly simplifying the non-destructive estimation of corolla area (and potentially shoot-level total leaf area).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":805,"journal":{"name":"Trees","volume":"40 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees","FirstCategoryId":"2","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00468-026-02830-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Key message

There is a robust linear relationship between the proportionality coefficients of the Montgomery and Montgomery–Koyama–Smith equations.

Abstract

The Montgomery equation (ME) assumes a proportional relationship between individual leaf area and the product of leaf length and width, whereas the Montgomery–Koyama–Smith equation (MKSE) assumes a proportional relationship between the total leaf area per shoot and the product of the sum of individual leaf widths and maximum leaf length. Given the developmental homology between petals and leaves, the ME and MKSE are hypothesized to also apply to petal and corolla areas. However, prior studies have neglected the potential link between their respective proportionality coefficients. To validate the ME and MKSE for calculating individual petal area (A) and total corolla area per flower (AT), and to test the correlation between the ME and MKSE proportionality coefficients (k for ME and kKS for MKSE), we measured 2700 petals from 540 flowers across nine Malus cultivars. Goodness of fit was assessed using the root-mean-square error (RMSE) and the coefficient of determination (r2). The ME and MKSE were validated for all nine cultivars, effectively predicting A and AT with high precision (as gauged by low RMSE and high r2). Importantly, a statistically significant one-to-one (isometric) scaling relationship was observed between k and kKS. The isometric relationship between the two proportionality coefficients provides a quantitative link between individual petal geometry and whole-corolla structure, significantly simplifying the non-destructive estimation of corolla area (and potentially shoot-level total leaf area).

Montgomery - koyama - smith方程比例系数的等距关系:来自9个苹果品种的证据
在Montgomery和Montgomery - koyama - smith方程的比例系数之间存在一个强大的线性关系。摘要Montgomery方程(ME)假设单叶面积与叶长与叶宽积成正比关系,Montgomery - koyama - smith方程(MKSE)假设单枝总叶面积与单叶宽与最大叶长之和成正比关系。鉴于花瓣和叶片之间的发育同源性,假设ME和MKSE也适用于花瓣和花冠区域。然而,先前的研究忽略了它们各自比例系数之间的潜在联系。为了验证ME和MKSE计算单花花瓣面积(A)和总花冠面积(AT)的有效性,并检验ME和MKSE比例系数(k代表ME, kKS代表MKSE)之间的相关性,我们测量了9个苹果品种540朵花的2700片花瓣。采用均方根误差(RMSE)和决定系数(r2)评估拟合优度。对9个品种的ME和MKSE进行了验证,结果表明,ME和MKSE对A和AT的预测精度较高(RMSE较低,r2较高)。重要的是,在k和kKS之间观察到统计上显著的一对一(等距)缩放关系。两个比例系数之间的等距关系提供了单个花瓣几何形状和整个花冠结构之间的定量联系,大大简化了花冠面积(以及潜在的枝级总叶面积)的无损估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trees
Trees 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Trees - Structure and Function publishes original articles on the physiology, biochemistry, functional anatomy, structure and ecology of trees and other woody plants. Also presented are articles concerned with pathology and technological problems, when they contribute to the basic understanding of structure and function of trees. In addition to original articles and short communications, the journal publishes reviews on selected topics concerning the structure and function of trees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书