Sparse Regional Gravity Field Modeling by Greedy SRBF

IF 2.1 4区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Xun Zhang, Guobin Chang, Hefang Bian, Huachao Yang, Nijia Qian, Yuanfei Ren, Haonan Feng, Lubin Chang
{"title":"Sparse Regional Gravity Field Modeling by Greedy SRBF","authors":"Xun Zhang,&nbsp;Guobin Chang,&nbsp;Hefang Bian,&nbsp;Huachao Yang,&nbsp;Nijia Qian,&nbsp;Yuanfei Ren,&nbsp;Haonan Feng,&nbsp;Lubin Chang","doi":"10.1007/s00024-026-04083-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Spherical Radial Basis Function (SRBF) is one of the mainstream methods for regional gravity field modeling. Its traditional solution relies on Tikhonov regularization, which requires inverting a high-dimensional square matrix whose dimension equals the number of SRBF. Additionally, constructing a large-scale design matrix during the prediction phase incurs significant computational and storage costs, making it difficult to handle large-scale datasets. To address this bottleneck, this paper treats SRBF as an overcomplete dictionary and reformulates the gravity field modeling problem as a sparse coefficient recovery problem. Two classic greedy algorithms—Matching Pursuit (MP) and Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (OMP)—are introduced to solve for the sparse combination coefficients, thereby fundamentally avoiding the inversion of high-dimensional matrices and the construction of large-scale design matrices. Using the complex mountainous area of Colorado, USA, as the study area, we conduct experiments that fuse ground and airborne gravity data with 37,351 SRBF nodes generated based on the Reuter grid. The results show that when the OMP algorithm reaches a sparsity of approximately 3000 non-zero coefficients, the external validation standard deviation relative to the GSVS17 benchmark points is 2.19 cm, which is comparable to the accuracy achieved by Tikhonov regularization. Under a similar sparsity level, the MP algorithm achieves an accuracy of 2.37 cm. Both algorithms produce a highly sparse model—only about 8% of the total SRBF coefficients are non-zero-yielding substantial reductions in storage and prediction cost while maintaining geoid-level accuracy. Additional experiments conducted in the Auvergne region (presented in the Appendix) further validate the general applicability of the proposed Greedy SRBF method across different geographical areas and SRBF densities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21078,"journal":{"name":"pure and applied geophysics","volume":"183 9","pages":"4567 - 4583"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"pure and applied geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00024-026-04083-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spherical Radial Basis Function (SRBF) is one of the mainstream methods for regional gravity field modeling. Its traditional solution relies on Tikhonov regularization, which requires inverting a high-dimensional square matrix whose dimension equals the number of SRBF. Additionally, constructing a large-scale design matrix during the prediction phase incurs significant computational and storage costs, making it difficult to handle large-scale datasets. To address this bottleneck, this paper treats SRBF as an overcomplete dictionary and reformulates the gravity field modeling problem as a sparse coefficient recovery problem. Two classic greedy algorithms—Matching Pursuit (MP) and Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (OMP)—are introduced to solve for the sparse combination coefficients, thereby fundamentally avoiding the inversion of high-dimensional matrices and the construction of large-scale design matrices. Using the complex mountainous area of Colorado, USA, as the study area, we conduct experiments that fuse ground and airborne gravity data with 37,351 SRBF nodes generated based on the Reuter grid. The results show that when the OMP algorithm reaches a sparsity of approximately 3000 non-zero coefficients, the external validation standard deviation relative to the GSVS17 benchmark points is 2.19 cm, which is comparable to the accuracy achieved by Tikhonov regularization. Under a similar sparsity level, the MP algorithm achieves an accuracy of 2.37 cm. Both algorithms produce a highly sparse model—only about 8% of the total SRBF coefficients are non-zero-yielding substantial reductions in storage and prediction cost while maintaining geoid-level accuracy. Additional experiments conducted in the Auvergne region (presented in the Appendix) further validate the general applicability of the proposed Greedy SRBF method across different geographical areas and SRBF densities.

基于贪婪SRBF的稀疏区域重力场建模
球面径向基函数(SRBF)是区域重力场建模的主流方法之一。其传统的解决方案依赖于Tikhonov正则化,该正则化需要对一个维数等于SRBF数的高维方阵进行反演。此外,在预测阶段构建大规模设计矩阵需要大量的计算和存储成本,这使得处理大规模数据集变得困难。为了解决这一瓶颈,本文将SRBF视为一个过完备字典,并将重力场建模问题重新表述为一个稀疏系数恢复问题。引入两种经典贪心算法匹配寻优(MP)和正交匹配寻优(OMP)求解稀疏组合系数,从根本上避免了高维矩阵的反演和大规模设计矩阵的构建。我们以美国科罗拉多州的复杂山区为研究区域,对基于Reuter网格生成的37351个SRBF节点进行了地面和空中重力数据融合实验。结果表明,当OMP算法达到约3000个非零系数的稀疏度时,相对于GSVS17基准点的外部验证标准差为2.19 cm,与Tikhonov正则化所达到的精度相当。在相似的稀疏度水平下,MP算法的精度达到2.37 cm。这两种算法都产生了高度稀疏的模型——只有大约8%的SRBF系数是非零的,从而在保持大地水准面精度的同时大幅降低了存储和预测成本。在奥弗涅地区进行的其他实验(见附录)进一步验证了所提出的Greedy SRBF方法在不同地理区域和SRBF密度下的一般适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
pure and applied geophysics
pure and applied geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
240
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: pure and applied geophysics (pageoph), a continuation of the journal "Geofisica pura e applicata", publishes original scientific contributions in the fields of solid Earth, atmospheric and oceanic sciences. Regular and special issues feature thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and state-of-the-art surveys. Long running journal, founded in 1939 as Geofisica pura e applicata Publishes peer-reviewed original scientific contributions and state-of-the-art surveys in solid earth and atmospheric sciences Features thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and is a major source for publications on tsunami research Coverage extends to research topics in oceanic sciences See Instructions for Authors on the right hand side.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书