Ilyes Salhi, Mourad El Koundi, Mohamed Aymen Ben Khalifa, Wafa Talhaoui, Abdessalem El Ghali
{"title":"A comprehensive review of machine learning and deep learning applications in remote sensing for lithological mapping","authors":"Ilyes Salhi, Mourad El Koundi, Mohamed Aymen Ben Khalifa, Wafa Talhaoui, Abdessalem El Ghali","doi":"10.1007/s11600-026-02024-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Lithological mapping is critical for resource management, environmental assessment, and geohazard mitigation in regions where climate change and rapid land use require robust geoscientific tools. Integrating remote sensing (RS) with machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) provides objective and reproducible alternatives to traditional field surveys. This quantitative review synthesizes 444 independent case studies across 154 peer-reviewed publications to evaluate algorithm performance across diverse RS and geological settings. Kruskal–Wallis testing confirms statistically significant performance disparities among classification algorithms and architectures (H = 48.02, <i>p </i>< 0.001, ε<sup>2 </sup>= 0.11). Categorical meta-regression also reveals that geological context and sensor configurations significantly control the performance. For single-source RS data, conventional ML algorithms yield stable baseline metrics (mean overall accuracy (OA) ≈ 0.84—0.85). Conversely, hybrid DL architectures excel in high-dimensional settings, with multisource fusion (particularly multispectral + geophysical + geochemical data) achieving highest predictive accuracy (mean OA ≈ 0.90—0.95, kappa > 0.90). Categorical analyses demonstrate that mixed sedimentary–igneous–metamorphic contexts impose statistically significant accuracy penalties (<i>p </i>< 0.01) compared to igneous settings, though DL models better maintain accuracy in sedimentary settings (mean OA > 0.86, kappa > 0.81). Environmental constraints remain pervasive, with dense vegetation causing accuracy drops up to 5% in OA and 8% in kappa across all models. Egger’s regression (<i>p </i>= 0.6) confirms the absence of severe publication bias despite high methodological heterogeneity. Future research should prioritize label-efficient techniques, context-aware multimodal integration, lightweight edge deployment, and standardized multisensor benchmarks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":6988,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geophysica","volume":"74 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geophysica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11600-026-02024-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Lithological mapping is critical for resource management, environmental assessment, and geohazard mitigation in regions where climate change and rapid land use require robust geoscientific tools. Integrating remote sensing (RS) with machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) provides objective and reproducible alternatives to traditional field surveys. This quantitative review synthesizes 444 independent case studies across 154 peer-reviewed publications to evaluate algorithm performance across diverse RS and geological settings. Kruskal–Wallis testing confirms statistically significant performance disparities among classification algorithms and architectures (H = 48.02, p < 0.001, ε2 = 0.11). Categorical meta-regression also reveals that geological context and sensor configurations significantly control the performance. For single-source RS data, conventional ML algorithms yield stable baseline metrics (mean overall accuracy (OA) ≈ 0.84—0.85). Conversely, hybrid DL architectures excel in high-dimensional settings, with multisource fusion (particularly multispectral + geophysical + geochemical data) achieving highest predictive accuracy (mean OA ≈ 0.90—0.95, kappa > 0.90). Categorical analyses demonstrate that mixed sedimentary–igneous–metamorphic contexts impose statistically significant accuracy penalties (p < 0.01) compared to igneous settings, though DL models better maintain accuracy in sedimentary settings (mean OA > 0.86, kappa > 0.81). Environmental constraints remain pervasive, with dense vegetation causing accuracy drops up to 5% in OA and 8% in kappa across all models. Egger’s regression (p = 0.6) confirms the absence of severe publication bias despite high methodological heterogeneity. Future research should prioritize label-efficient techniques, context-aware multimodal integration, lightweight edge deployment, and standardized multisensor benchmarks.
期刊介绍:
Acta Geophysica is open to all kinds of manuscripts including research and review articles, short communications, comments to published papers, letters to the Editor as well as book reviews. Some of the issues are fully devoted to particular topics; we do encourage proposals for such topical issues. We accept submissions from scientists world-wide, offering high scientific and editorial standard and comprehensive treatment of the discussed topics.