Sensitivity of WRF Rainfall Simulations to Physical Parameterization Schemes over Tropical Peatlands in the Maritime Continent

IF 2.3 4区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Mudrik Haikal, Muh Taufik, Yudi Setiawan, Findy Renggono
{"title":"Sensitivity of WRF Rainfall Simulations to Physical Parameterization Schemes over Tropical Peatlands in the Maritime Continent","authors":"Mudrik Haikal,&nbsp;Muh Taufik,&nbsp;Yudi Setiawan,&nbsp;Findy Renggono","doi":"10.1007/s13143-026-00454-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Mitigating hydrometeorological hazards, particularly peatland fires, requires reliable rainfall simulations over the Maritime Continent (MC). However, accurately simulating rainfall remains challenging because of complex interactions among convection and land–atmosphere processes in tropical peatland regions. This study evaluates the sensitivity of rainfall simulations to different physical parameterization schemes in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, focusing on two microphysics schemes (WRF Single-Moment 3-class (WSM3) and WRF Single-Moment 6-class (WSM6)), three cumulus schemes (Betts–Miller–Janjic (BMJ), New Tiedtke (NT), and Kain–Fritsch (KF), and two planetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes (Yonsei University (YSU) and Mellor–Yamada–Janjic (MYJ)). These configurations were evaluated over southeastern Borneo during the 2019 El Niño dry season. Model performance was assessed using the probability of detection (POD), proportion correct (PC), mean absolute error (MAE), and Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ). Rainfall simulations were highly sensitive to the choice of cumulus and PBL parameterizations, with convective precipitation (RAINC) accounting for an average of 82.5% of total simulated rainfall. BMJ performed best in detecting rainfall events, whereas NT showed superior performance under no-rain conditions. Both schemes generally performed better with the YSU scheme, and the BMJ–YSU combination exhibited relatively balanced performance across four evaluation metrics, with no pronounced degradation in any individual metric. Statistical analyses showed no significant differences between WSM3 and WSM6, whereas cumulus and PBL parameterizations significantly affected rainfall simulation performance. These findings provide guidance for selecting WRF physical parameterization schemes for tropical peatland rainfall simulations under dry-season conditions within the tested model configuration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8556,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences","volume":"62 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13143-026-00454-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mitigating hydrometeorological hazards, particularly peatland fires, requires reliable rainfall simulations over the Maritime Continent (MC). However, accurately simulating rainfall remains challenging because of complex interactions among convection and land–atmosphere processes in tropical peatland regions. This study evaluates the sensitivity of rainfall simulations to different physical parameterization schemes in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, focusing on two microphysics schemes (WRF Single-Moment 3-class (WSM3) and WRF Single-Moment 6-class (WSM6)), three cumulus schemes (Betts–Miller–Janjic (BMJ), New Tiedtke (NT), and Kain–Fritsch (KF), and two planetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes (Yonsei University (YSU) and Mellor–Yamada–Janjic (MYJ)). These configurations were evaluated over southeastern Borneo during the 2019 El Niño dry season. Model performance was assessed using the probability of detection (POD), proportion correct (PC), mean absolute error (MAE), and Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ). Rainfall simulations were highly sensitive to the choice of cumulus and PBL parameterizations, with convective precipitation (RAINC) accounting for an average of 82.5% of total simulated rainfall. BMJ performed best in detecting rainfall events, whereas NT showed superior performance under no-rain conditions. Both schemes generally performed better with the YSU scheme, and the BMJ–YSU combination exhibited relatively balanced performance across four evaluation metrics, with no pronounced degradation in any individual metric. Statistical analyses showed no significant differences between WSM3 and WSM6, whereas cumulus and PBL parameterizations significantly affected rainfall simulation performance. These findings provide guidance for selecting WRF physical parameterization schemes for tropical peatland rainfall simulations under dry-season conditions within the tested model configuration.

海洋大陆热带泥炭地WRF降雨模拟对物理参数化方案的敏感性
减轻水文气象灾害,特别是泥炭地火灾,需要在海洋大陆(MC)上进行可靠的降雨模拟。然而,由于热带泥炭地地区对流和陆地-大气过程之间复杂的相互作用,精确模拟降雨仍然具有挑战性。研究了WRF模式中降雨模拟对不同物理参数化方案的敏感性,重点研究了WRF单矩3级(WSM3)和WRF单矩6级(WSM6)两种微物理方案、Betts-Miller-Janjic (BMJ)、New Tiedtke (NT)和Kain-Fritsch (KF)三种积云方案和两种行星边界层(PBL)方案(Yonsei University (YSU)和Mellor-Yamada-Janjic (MYJ))。这些配置在2019年El Niño旱季期间在婆罗洲东南部进行了评估。使用检测概率(POD)、比例正确率(PC)、平均绝对误差(MAE)和Spearman相关系数(ρ)评估模型性能。降雨模拟对积云和PBL参数化的选择高度敏感,对流降水(RAINC)平均占模拟总降雨量的82.5%。BMJ在检测降雨事件方面表现最好,而NT在无雨条件下表现较好。两种方案与YSU方案相比通常表现更好,BMJ-YSU组合在四个评估指标上表现出相对平衡的性能,在任何单个指标上都没有明显的下降。统计分析表明,WSM3和WSM6之间没有显著差异,而积云和PBL参数化对降雨模拟性能有显著影响。这些发现为在试验模式配置下选择WRF物理参数化方案用于干旱条件下热带泥炭地降雨模拟提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences
Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences (APJAS) is an international journal of the Korean Meteorological Society (KMS), published fully in English. It has started from 2008 by succeeding the KMS'' former journal, the Journal of the Korean Meteorological Society (JKMS), which published a total of 47 volumes as of 2011, in its time-honored tradition since 1965. Since 2008, the APJAS is included in the journal list of Thomson Reuters’ SCIE (Science Citation Index Expanded) and also in SCOPUS, the Elsevier Bibliographic Database, indicating the increased awareness and quality of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书