The Open-Shell Organic Systems Database: Diverse CCSD(T)/CBS Reaction Energies for Assessing Density Functional Theory and Machine Learning Methods

IF 3 2区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A Pub Date : 2026-09-17 Epub Date: 2026-09-08 DOI:10.1021/acs.jpca.6c03915
Amir Karton
{"title":"The Open-Shell Organic Systems Database: Diverse CCSD(T)/CBS Reaction Energies for Assessing Density Functional Theory and Machine Learning Methods","authors":"Amir Karton","doi":"10.1021/acs.jpca.6c03915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We present the Open-Shell Organic Systems (OSOS) database,\r\na diverse\r\nbenchmark set comprising 9934 atomization, isomerization, and H-abstraction\r\nenergies computed at the CCSD(T)/CBS limit via W1-F12 theory. Historically,\r\nlarge-scale data sets (e.g., QM9 and ANI-1x) have been heavily biased\r\ntoward closed-shell species. The OSOS database addresses this gap\r\nby providing a diverse and accurate set of reaction energies dedicated\r\nexclusively to organic doublet radical systems for benchmarking and\r\ntraining purposes. The data set covers the chemical space spanned\r\nby localized and delocalized organic radicals containing up to seven\r\nnon-hydrogen atoms (C, N, O, and F). The database consists of 3360\r\nradical total atomization energies, 3360 H-abstractions, 2292 H-shifts,\r\nand 922 constitutional isomerizations. We use this database to assess\r\nthe performance of density functional theory (DFT). We find that most\r\ndensity functionals systematically overestimate radical atomization\r\nenergies; therefore, the inclusion of dispersion corrections generally\r\nleads to a deterioration in performance. Furthermore, delocalized\r\nradicals present a significantly greater challenge for most DFT methods\r\nthan localized species, leading to larger overestimations of their\r\natomization energies. For localized radicals, errors increase in the\r\norder: O-centered &lt; C-centered &lt; N-centered. Remarkably, the\r\ndeep-learning meta-GGA Skala functional demonstrates exceptional accuracy,\r\nsignificantly outperforming conventional functionals across all rungs\r\nof Jacob’s Ladder and consistently achieving mean absolute\r\ndeviations below 1 kcal mol<sup>–1</sup> for the abstraction,\r\nshift, and isomerization reactions. The OSOS database establishes\r\na rigorous standard to guide the development and validation of next-generation\r\ndensity functionals and machine-learning potentials for doublet radicals.</p>","PeriodicalId":59,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry A","volume":"130 37","pages":"7267–7282"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry A","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpca.6c03915","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We present the Open-Shell Organic Systems (OSOS) database, a diverse benchmark set comprising 9934 atomization, isomerization, and H-abstraction energies computed at the CCSD(T)/CBS limit via W1-F12 theory. Historically, large-scale data sets (e.g., QM9 and ANI-1x) have been heavily biased toward closed-shell species. The OSOS database addresses this gap by providing a diverse and accurate set of reaction energies dedicated exclusively to organic doublet radical systems for benchmarking and training purposes. The data set covers the chemical space spanned by localized and delocalized organic radicals containing up to seven non-hydrogen atoms (C, N, O, and F). The database consists of 3360 radical total atomization energies, 3360 H-abstractions, 2292 H-shifts, and 922 constitutional isomerizations. We use this database to assess the performance of density functional theory (DFT). We find that most density functionals systematically overestimate radical atomization energies; therefore, the inclusion of dispersion corrections generally leads to a deterioration in performance. Furthermore, delocalized radicals present a significantly greater challenge for most DFT methods than localized species, leading to larger overestimations of their atomization energies. For localized radicals, errors increase in the order: O-centered < C-centered < N-centered. Remarkably, the deep-learning meta-GGA Skala functional demonstrates exceptional accuracy, significantly outperforming conventional functionals across all rungs of Jacob’s Ladder and consistently achieving mean absolute deviations below 1 kcal mol–1 for the abstraction, shift, and isomerization reactions. The OSOS database establishes a rigorous standard to guide the development and validation of next-generation density functionals and machine-learning potentials for doublet radicals.

开壳有机系统数据库:用于评估密度泛函理论和机器学习方法的不同CCSD(T)/CBS反应能
我们提出了开壳有机系统(OSOS)数据库,这是一个多样化的基准集,包括9934个原子化,异构化和h -抽象能,通过W1-F12理论在CCSD(T)/CBS极限下计算。从历史上看,大规模数据集(如QM9和ANI-1x)严重偏向于闭壳物种。OSOS数据库解决了这一空白,提供了一套多样化和准确的反应能量,专门用于基准测试和培训目的的有机双峰自由基系统。该数据集涵盖了由局部和非局部有机自由基所跨越的化学空间,其中包含多达7个非氢原子(C, N, O和F)。该数据库包含3360个原子团总原子化能、3360个氢原子抽象、2292个氢原子移位和922个构造异构化。我们使用这个数据库来评估密度泛函理论(DFT)的性能。我们发现大多数密度泛函系统地高估了自由基原子化能;因此,包含色散校正通常会导致性能的恶化。此外,对于大多数DFT方法来说,非定域自由基比定域自由基面临更大的挑战,导致对其原子化能的较大高估。对于局域自由基,误差增加的顺序为:o为中心<; c为中心<; n为中心。值得注意的是,深度学习meta-GGA Skala功能显示出卓越的准确性,在Jacob 's Ladder的所有阶梯上都明显优于传统功能,并且在抽象、转移和异构化反应中始终实现低于1 kcal mol-1的平均绝对偏差。OSOS数据库建立了一个严格的标准来指导下一代密度泛函的开发和验证,以及双线自由基的机器学习潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 化学-物理:原子、分子和化学物理
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
922
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physical Chemistry A is devoted to reporting new and original experimental and theoretical basic research of interest to physical chemists, biophysical chemists, and chemical physicists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书