{"title":"Socioeconomic Disparities in PFAS Exposure and Susceptibility to Diabetes in Chinese Adults: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Saisai Ji, Jinghua Wang, Yingli Qu, Zheng Li, Yitao Pan, Yawei Li, Haocan Song, Linna Xie, Wenli Zhang, Jiayi Cai, Feng Zhao, Ying Zhu, Zhaojin Cao, Shilu Tong, Yuebin Lv, Jiayin Dai, Guang Jia, Xiaoming Shi","doi":"10.1021/envhealth.6c00036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Emerging\r\nevidence indicates that socioeconomic status (SES) shapes\r\nnot only patterns of environmental exposure but also the susceptibility\r\nto environmental hazards. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)\r\nrepresent a distinctive case in which socioeconomically disadvantaged\r\npopulations often exhibit lower exposure levels, raising critical\r\nquestions about how such exposure patterns translate into health inequalities,\r\nparticularly for diabetes. Using cross-sectional data from 10 302\r\nadults participating in the China National Human Biomonitoring (CNHBM)\r\nprogram, we examined socioeconomic disparities in serum PFAS concentrations\r\nand assessed whether lower SES is associated with stronger PFAS-diabetes\r\nassociations among Chinese adults. We found that individuals with\r\nhigher SES exhibited 4–10% higher serum concentrations of PFOA,\r\nPFUnDA, PFHxS, PFHpS, PFOS, and 6:2 Cl-PFESA (all <em>p</em> values <0.05). In contrast, associations between PFAS exposure\r\nand diabetes were generally stronger among low-SES participants. Across\r\nmultiple PFAS, odds ratios for diabetes in the low-SES group were\r\n0–17% greater relative to the high-SES group, with statistically\r\nsignificant effect modification observed for PFUnDA, PFOS, and 6:2\r\nCl-PFESA. These findings indicate that socioeconomic disadvantage\r\nmay be associated with greater susceptibility, even at lower exposure\r\nlevels, underscoring the importance of considering differential susceptibility\r\nwhen assessing environmental health risks and advancing health equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":29795,"journal":{"name":"Environment & Health","volume":"4 9","pages":"2126–2136"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment & Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/envhealth.6c00036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Emerging
evidence indicates that socioeconomic status (SES) shapes
not only patterns of environmental exposure but also the susceptibility
to environmental hazards. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)
represent a distinctive case in which socioeconomically disadvantaged
populations often exhibit lower exposure levels, raising critical
questions about how such exposure patterns translate into health inequalities,
particularly for diabetes. Using cross-sectional data from 10 302
adults participating in the China National Human Biomonitoring (CNHBM)
program, we examined socioeconomic disparities in serum PFAS concentrations
and assessed whether lower SES is associated with stronger PFAS-diabetes
associations among Chinese adults. We found that individuals with
higher SES exhibited 4–10% higher serum concentrations of PFOA,
PFUnDA, PFHxS, PFHpS, PFOS, and 6:2 Cl-PFESA (all p values <0.05). In contrast, associations between PFAS exposure
and diabetes were generally stronger among low-SES participants. Across
multiple PFAS, odds ratios for diabetes in the low-SES group were
0–17% greater relative to the high-SES group, with statistically
significant effect modification observed for PFUnDA, PFOS, and 6:2
Cl-PFESA. These findings indicate that socioeconomic disadvantage
may be associated with greater susceptibility, even at lower exposure
levels, underscoring the importance of considering differential susceptibility
when assessing environmental health risks and advancing health equity.
期刊介绍:
Environment & Health a peer-reviewed open access journal is committed to exploring the relationship between the environment and human health.As a premier journal for multidisciplinary research Environment & Health reports the health consequences for individuals and communities of changing and hazardous environmental factors. In supporting the UN Sustainable Development Goals the journal aims to help formulate policies to create a healthier world.Topics of interest include but are not limited to:Air water and soil pollutionExposomicsEnvironmental epidemiologyInnovative analytical methodology and instrumentation (multi-omics non-target analysis effect-directed analysis high-throughput screening etc.)Environmental toxicology (endocrine disrupting effect neurotoxicity alternative toxicology computational toxicology epigenetic toxicology etc.)Environmental microbiology pathogen and environmental transmission mechanisms of diseasesEnvironmental modeling bioinformatics and artificial intelligenceEmerging contaminants (including plastics engineered nanomaterials etc.)Climate change and related health effectHealth impacts of energy evolution and carbon neutralizationFood and drinking water safetyOccupational exposure and medicineInnovations in environmental technologies for better healthPolicies and international relations concerned with environmental health