Preoperative identification of adverse pathology in clinically localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma: development and external validation of a contrast-enhanced ultrasound-based model.

IF 2.2
Ji Ma, Zu-Sheng Du, Fang Li, Zhen-Fang Wang, Wenzhi Li, Rong Wu
{"title":"Preoperative identification of adverse pathology in clinically localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma: development and external validation of a contrast-enhanced ultrasound-based model.","authors":"Ji Ma, Zu-Sheng Du, Fang Li, Zhen-Fang Wang, Wenzhi Li, Rong Wu","doi":"10.1007/s00261-026-05795-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop and externally validate a model combining contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), clinical, and laboratory features to identify adverse pathology in clinically localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 370 surgically treated patients with cT1-T2 ccRCC. Center 1 patients were randomly split into training (n = 210) and internal test (n = 91) sets; Center 2 provided external validation (n = 69). Adverse pathology comprised WHO/ISUP grade 3-4, tumor necrosis, invasion, or nodal metastasis. Two blinded readers assessed images. All 41 preoperative candidates entered logistic least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression with stratified ten-fold cross-validation and the one-standard-error rule. Internal validation used 200 bootstrap resamples of the complete modeling procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adverse pathology was present in 138 patients. Seven predictors were retained, including four CEUS features. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) were 0.810 (95% CI, 0.752-0.868), 0.875 (0.805-0.944), and 0.799 (0.688-0.910) in the training, internal test, and external cohorts, respectively; optimism-corrected training AUC was 0.747. External predictions were compressed (calibration slope, 2.380). At the training-derived threshold of 0.3051, adverse pathology was present in 61.5% (24/39) of external patients with positive results and 6.7% (2/30) with negative results, compared with 37.7% overall.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The model showed moderate external discrimination and may support preoperative assessment by identifying patients at lower risk. Prospective multicenter studies are needed to validate individual risk estimates and assess clinical impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":520541,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal radiology (New York)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal radiology (New York)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-026-05795-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and externally validate a model combining contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), clinical, and laboratory features to identify adverse pathology in clinically localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

Methods: This retrospective study included 370 surgically treated patients with cT1-T2 ccRCC. Center 1 patients were randomly split into training (n = 210) and internal test (n = 91) sets; Center 2 provided external validation (n = 69). Adverse pathology comprised WHO/ISUP grade 3-4, tumor necrosis, invasion, or nodal metastasis. Two blinded readers assessed images. All 41 preoperative candidates entered logistic least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression with stratified ten-fold cross-validation and the one-standard-error rule. Internal validation used 200 bootstrap resamples of the complete modeling procedure.

Results: Adverse pathology was present in 138 patients. Seven predictors were retained, including four CEUS features. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) were 0.810 (95% CI, 0.752-0.868), 0.875 (0.805-0.944), and 0.799 (0.688-0.910) in the training, internal test, and external cohorts, respectively; optimism-corrected training AUC was 0.747. External predictions were compressed (calibration slope, 2.380). At the training-derived threshold of 0.3051, adverse pathology was present in 61.5% (24/39) of external patients with positive results and 6.7% (2/30) with negative results, compared with 37.7% overall.

Conclusion: The model showed moderate external discrimination and may support preoperative assessment by identifying patients at lower risk. Prospective multicenter studies are needed to validate individual risk estimates and assess clinical impact.

临床局限性透明细胞肾细胞癌的术前不良病理鉴定:基于超声造影增强模型的建立和外部验证
目的:建立并外部验证一种结合造影增强超声(CEUS)、临床和实验室特征的模型,以识别临床局限性透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)的不良病理。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了370例手术治疗的cT1-T2 ccRCC患者。中心1患者随机分为训练组(n = 210)和内测组(n = 91);中心2提供外部验证(n = 69)。不良病理包括WHO/ISUP分级3-4级、肿瘤坏死、侵袭或淋巴结转移。两名盲眼读者评估图像。所有41例术前候选者均采用分层十倍交叉验证和一标准误差规则进行logistic最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归。内部验证使用了200个bootstrap样本的完整建模过程。结果:138例患者出现不良病理。保留了7个预测指标,包括4个超声造影特征。训练组、内测组和外测组的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(auc)分别为0.810 (95% CI, 0.752 ~ 0.868)、0.875(0.805 ~ 0.944)和0.799 (0.688 ~ 0.910);乐观校正训练AUC为0.747。外部预测被压缩(校准斜率,2.380)。在训练衍生阈值为0.3051时,61.5%(24/39)的外部阳性患者出现不良病理,6.7%(2/30)的外部阴性患者出现不良病理,而总体为37.7%。结论:该模型具有中等程度的外部识别能力,可以通过识别低风险患者来支持术前评估。需要前瞻性多中心研究来验证个体风险评估和评估临床影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书