ECG-based artificial intelligence for obstructive sleep apnea detection: a mechanism-oriented diagnostic meta-analysis.

IF 2
Ayşe Bulut, Ömer Engin Bulut
{"title":"ECG-based artificial intelligence for obstructive sleep apnea detection: a mechanism-oriented diagnostic meta-analysis.","authors":"Ayşe Bulut, Ömer Engin Bulut","doi":"10.1007/s11325-026-03798-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI)-based approaches have shown promising performance in the detection of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) using electrocardiography (ECG)-based physiological signals. However, existing studies primarily focus on diagnostic accuracy, while the underlying physiological mechanisms driving AI-based detection remain largely unexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of segment-level AI models and to provide a mechanism-oriented interpretation of their physiological basis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-DTA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore databases were systematically searched. Studies utilizing AI models for segment-level OSA detection based on physiological signals were included. Sensitivity and specificity values were extracted, and 2 × 2 contingency tables were reconstructed using a standardized approach to enable cross-study comparability. A bivariate random-effects model was applied, and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were generated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.88 and 0.89, respectively, indicating high diagnostic performance. The SROC curve demonstrated excellent discriminative ability (AUC > 0.90), with moderate between-study heterogeneity. Notably, consistent performance across diverse model architectures suggests that AI models rely on stable physiological signal patterns rather than dataset-specific features.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI-based models using physiological signals achieve high diagnostic accuracy for segment-level OSA detection. Importantly, these findings suggest that AI systems may not directly detect airway obstruction but instead may identify downstream physiological responses, particularly autonomic nervous system alterations reflected in cardiovascular signals.</p>","PeriodicalId":520777,"journal":{"name":"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung","volume":"30 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-026-03798-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Artificial intelligence (AI)-based approaches have shown promising performance in the detection of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) using electrocardiography (ECG)-based physiological signals. However, existing studies primarily focus on diagnostic accuracy, while the underlying physiological mechanisms driving AI-based detection remain largely unexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of segment-level AI models and to provide a mechanism-oriented interpretation of their physiological basis.

Methods: A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-DTA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore databases were systematically searched. Studies utilizing AI models for segment-level OSA detection based on physiological signals were included. Sensitivity and specificity values were extracted, and 2 × 2 contingency tables were reconstructed using a standardized approach to enable cross-study comparability. A bivariate random-effects model was applied, and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were generated.

Results: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.88 and 0.89, respectively, indicating high diagnostic performance. The SROC curve demonstrated excellent discriminative ability (AUC > 0.90), with moderate between-study heterogeneity. Notably, consistent performance across diverse model architectures suggests that AI models rely on stable physiological signal patterns rather than dataset-specific features.

Conclusions: AI-based models using physiological signals achieve high diagnostic accuracy for segment-level OSA detection. Importantly, these findings suggest that AI systems may not directly detect airway obstruction but instead may identify downstream physiological responses, particularly autonomic nervous system alterations reflected in cardiovascular signals.

基于脑电图的人工智能用于阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停检测:一项面向机制的诊断荟萃分析。
目的:基于人工智能(AI)的方法在利用基于心电图(ECG)的生理信号检测阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)方面显示出良好的表现。然而,现有的研究主要集中在诊断的准确性上,而驱动人工智能检测的潜在生理机制在很大程度上仍未被探索。本研究旨在评估节段级人工智能模型的诊断性能,并为其生理基础提供机制导向的解释。方法:根据PRISMA 2020和PRISMA- dta指南进行系统评价和诊断荟萃分析。系统检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和IEEE explore数据库。包括利用人工智能模型进行基于生理信号的段级OSA检测的研究。提取敏感性和特异性值,并使用标准化方法重建2 × 2列联表,以实现交叉研究的可比性。采用双变量随机效应模型,生成综合受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线。结果:13项研究符合纳入标准。合并敏感性和特异性分别为0.88和0.89,具有较高的诊断效能。SROC曲线具有良好的判别能力(AUC为0.90),研究间异质性中等。值得注意的是,不同模型架构的一致性能表明人工智能模型依赖于稳定的生理信号模式,而不是数据集特定的特征。结论:基于人工智能的生理信号模型在段级OSA检测中具有较高的诊断准确性。重要的是,这些发现表明人工智能系统可能不会直接检测气道阻塞,而是可以识别下游生理反应,特别是心血管信号中反映的自主神经系统改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书