Measuring motor intent for BCI control-A comparative analysis of signal quality of simultaneously recorded vECoG and scalp EEG.

IF 3.8
Nikole Chetty, James Bennett, Hunter R Schone, Adam Fry, Peter E Yoo, David Lacomis, Thomas J Oxley, Jennifer L Collinger, David F Putrino, Douglas J Weber
{"title":"Measuring motor intent for BCI control-A comparative analysis of signal quality of simultaneously recorded vECoG and scalp EEG.","authors":"Nikole Chetty, James Bennett, Hunter R Schone, Adam Fry, Peter E Yoo, David Lacomis, Thomas J Oxley, Jennifer L Collinger, David F Putrino, Douglas J Weber","doi":"10.1088/1741-2552/ae9eef","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>Stent-electrode arrays enable endovascular brain-computer interfaces (BCI) by recording cortical neural activity from within the superior sagittal sinus and have recently been evaluated in an early feasibility clinical trial in the United States (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05035823). For a BCI to be viable, the signals need to be high quality to enable accurate decoding of user intent. Compared to electrodes placed on the scalp for electroencephalography (EEG), stent-electrode arrays lie closer to the cortical surface and would presumably offer higher signal quality yet a direct comparison of intravascular and scalp-based neural recordings in humans has not yet been investigated.<i>Approach.</i>We directly compared the signal quality of vascular electrocorticography (vECoG) versus scalp EEG signals in one participant with severe upper limb paralysis due to ALS. During two experimental sessions, the participant underwent simultaneous recording with the stent-electrode array and a scalp EEG using a gel cap. The participant was visually cued to attempt motor tasks, such as repeated flexion and extension of the ankles. Signal quality was assessed by quantifying motor modulation strength, differentiation of movement effort, and spatial lateralization. Noise metrics evaluated the relative impact of artifacts including 60 Hz line noise, electrocardiogram contamination, eye blinks, jaw clenching, and vocalization.<i>Main results.</i>Both recording modalities exhibited significant modulation during attempted movement relative to rest, with vECoG generally demonstrating significantly stronger modulation per channel in some frequency bands and conditions. Motor modulation was significantly reduced during motor imagery compared to overt movement in both modalities. Spatial source localization between left and right ankle movement did not reach significance for either modality. Each modality was vulnerable to some artifacts while generally unaffected by others. Scalp EEG showed large susceptibility to ocular artifacts and cranial muscle activity due to its proximity to superficial physiological sources, whereas vECoG exhibited prominent cardiac activity.<i>Significance.</i>Within this participant, the large modulation during attempted movement recorded with vECoG, unaffected by the attenuating effects of the skull, coupled with fewer artifacts in the frequency bands of interest, provides preliminary evidence that the stent-electrode arrays can acquire high quality neural signals that could support BCI control.</p>","PeriodicalId":94096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neural engineering","volume":"23 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13584699/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neural engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ae9eef","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective.Stent-electrode arrays enable endovascular brain-computer interfaces (BCI) by recording cortical neural activity from within the superior sagittal sinus and have recently been evaluated in an early feasibility clinical trial in the United States (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05035823). For a BCI to be viable, the signals need to be high quality to enable accurate decoding of user intent. Compared to electrodes placed on the scalp for electroencephalography (EEG), stent-electrode arrays lie closer to the cortical surface and would presumably offer higher signal quality yet a direct comparison of intravascular and scalp-based neural recordings in humans has not yet been investigated.Approach.We directly compared the signal quality of vascular electrocorticography (vECoG) versus scalp EEG signals in one participant with severe upper limb paralysis due to ALS. During two experimental sessions, the participant underwent simultaneous recording with the stent-electrode array and a scalp EEG using a gel cap. The participant was visually cued to attempt motor tasks, such as repeated flexion and extension of the ankles. Signal quality was assessed by quantifying motor modulation strength, differentiation of movement effort, and spatial lateralization. Noise metrics evaluated the relative impact of artifacts including 60 Hz line noise, electrocardiogram contamination, eye blinks, jaw clenching, and vocalization.Main results.Both recording modalities exhibited significant modulation during attempted movement relative to rest, with vECoG generally demonstrating significantly stronger modulation per channel in some frequency bands and conditions. Motor modulation was significantly reduced during motor imagery compared to overt movement in both modalities. Spatial source localization between left and right ankle movement did not reach significance for either modality. Each modality was vulnerable to some artifacts while generally unaffected by others. Scalp EEG showed large susceptibility to ocular artifacts and cranial muscle activity due to its proximity to superficial physiological sources, whereas vECoG exhibited prominent cardiac activity.Significance.Within this participant, the large modulation during attempted movement recorded with vECoG, unaffected by the attenuating effects of the skull, coupled with fewer artifacts in the frequency bands of interest, provides preliminary evidence that the stent-electrode arrays can acquire high quality neural signals that could support BCI control.

脑机接口控制中运动意图的测量——同时记录vECoG和头皮EEG信号质量的比较分析。
目标。支架电极阵列通过记录上矢状窦内皮层神经活动来实现血管内脑机接口(BCI),最近在美国的早期可行性临床试验中进行了评估(ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05035823)。为了使BCI可行,信号需要高质量才能准确解码用户意图。与放置在头皮上进行脑电图(EEG)的电极相比,支架电极阵列更接近皮层表面,可能提供更高的信号质量,但人类血管内和头皮神经记录的直接比较尚未进行研究。方法:我们直接比较了一名因ALS引起的严重上肢瘫痪的参与者的血管皮质电图(vECoG)和头皮脑电图信号的信号质量。在两个实验过程中,参与者同时使用支架电极阵列和凝胶帽进行头皮脑电图记录。参与者在视觉上被提示尝试运动任务,如反复屈伸脚踝。信号质量通过量化运动调制强度、运动努力的分化和空间侧化来评估。噪声指标评估了人工制品的相对影响,包括60hz线路噪声、心电图污染、眨眼、咬牙切齿和发声。主要的结果。两种记录方式在尝试运动时都表现出明显的调制,而在某些频段和条件下,vECoG通常表现出每个通道明显更强的调制。与两种模式下的明显运动相比,运动想象期间的运动调制明显减少。左右踝关节运动之间的空间源定位在两种模式下都没有达到显著性。每种模态都容易受到某些工件的影响,而通常不受其他工件的影响。由于头皮脑电图接近浅表生理源,因此对眼部伪影和颅肌活动非常敏感,而vECoG显示出明显的心脏活动。在该参与者中,vECoG记录的尝试运动期间的大调制不受颅骨衰减效应的影响,加上感兴趣频段的伪影较少。初步证明支架电极阵列可以获得高质量的神经信号,支持脑机接口控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书