Long-Term Pain and Functional Outcomes After Cooled Genicular Radiofrequency Ablation With or Without Adjunctive Intra-Articular Botulinum Toxin Type A in Knee Osteoarthritis.
{"title":"Long-Term Pain and Functional Outcomes After Cooled Genicular Radiofrequency Ablation With or Without Adjunctive Intra-Articular Botulinum Toxin Type A in Knee Osteoarthritis.","authors":"Hassan A Moria","doi":"10.12659/MSM.953720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Cooled genicular radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) is used to treat symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA), although treatment response may decline over time. This study evaluated 24-month outcomes of CRFA alone versus CRFA combined with intra-articular botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A). MATERIAL AND METHODS In this retrospective observational comparative-effectiveness cohort study, 90 patients with moderate-to-severe knee OA underwent CRFA alone (n = 50) or CRFA plus intra-articular BoNT-A (n=40). The combination group received BoNT-A at baseline and a planned repeat injection at ~12 months. Pain and function were assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). The primary durability endpoint was the between-group difference in longitudinal NRS trajectories over 24 months, assessed using adjusted mixed-effects modeling. RESULTS Both groups demonstrated substantial early improvement; outcome trajectories diverged after ~12 months. Significant treatment-by-time interactions were observed for NRS (ß=-0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.21 to -0.47; P=0.0002) and WOMAC outcomes (ß=-6.3, 95% CI -9.4 to -3.2; P=0.0003). At 24 months, mean observed NRS scores were 4.2±2.3 after CRFA alone and 1.8±0.9 after CRFA plus BoNT-A; responder rates were 51.1% and 86.5%, respectively (P=0.0004). CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective observational cohort, a longitudinal treatment pathway combining CRFA with intra-articular BoNT-A was associated with more sustained pain relief and functional improvement over 24 months than CRFA alone. Prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings and clarify the independent contributions of adjunctive and repeat intra-articular BoNT-A.</p>","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"32 ","pages":"e953720"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13596015/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.953720","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cooled genicular radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) is used to treat symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA), although treatment response may decline over time. This study evaluated 24-month outcomes of CRFA alone versus CRFA combined with intra-articular botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A). MATERIAL AND METHODS In this retrospective observational comparative-effectiveness cohort study, 90 patients with moderate-to-severe knee OA underwent CRFA alone (n = 50) or CRFA plus intra-articular BoNT-A (n=40). The combination group received BoNT-A at baseline and a planned repeat injection at ~12 months. Pain and function were assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). The primary durability endpoint was the between-group difference in longitudinal NRS trajectories over 24 months, assessed using adjusted mixed-effects modeling. RESULTS Both groups demonstrated substantial early improvement; outcome trajectories diverged after ~12 months. Significant treatment-by-time interactions were observed for NRS (ß=-0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.21 to -0.47; P=0.0002) and WOMAC outcomes (ß=-6.3, 95% CI -9.4 to -3.2; P=0.0003). At 24 months, mean observed NRS scores were 4.2±2.3 after CRFA alone and 1.8±0.9 after CRFA plus BoNT-A; responder rates were 51.1% and 86.5%, respectively (P=0.0004). CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective observational cohort, a longitudinal treatment pathway combining CRFA with intra-articular BoNT-A was associated with more sustained pain relief and functional improvement over 24 months than CRFA alone. Prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings and clarify the independent contributions of adjunctive and repeat intra-articular BoNT-A.
期刊介绍:
Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper.
Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.