Long-Term Pain and Functional Outcomes After Cooled Genicular Radiofrequency Ablation With or Without Adjunctive Intra-Articular Botulinum Toxin Type A in Knee Osteoarthritis.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Hassan A Moria
{"title":"Long-Term Pain and Functional Outcomes After Cooled Genicular Radiofrequency Ablation With or Without Adjunctive Intra-Articular Botulinum Toxin Type A in Knee Osteoarthritis.","authors":"Hassan A Moria","doi":"10.12659/MSM.953720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Cooled genicular radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) is used to treat symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA), although treatment response may decline over time. This study evaluated 24-month outcomes of CRFA alone versus CRFA combined with intra-articular botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A). MATERIAL AND METHODS In this retrospective observational comparative-effectiveness cohort study, 90 patients with moderate-to-severe knee OA underwent CRFA alone (n = 50) or CRFA plus intra-articular BoNT-A (n=40). The combination group received BoNT-A at baseline and a planned repeat injection at ~12 months. Pain and function were assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). The primary durability endpoint was the between-group difference in longitudinal NRS trajectories over 24 months, assessed using adjusted mixed-effects modeling. RESULTS Both groups demonstrated substantial early improvement; outcome trajectories diverged after ~12 months. Significant treatment-by-time interactions were observed for NRS (ß=-0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.21 to -0.47; P=0.0002) and WOMAC outcomes (ß=-6.3, 95% CI -9.4 to -3.2; P=0.0003). At 24 months, mean observed NRS scores were 4.2±2.3 after CRFA alone and 1.8±0.9 after CRFA plus BoNT-A; responder rates were 51.1% and 86.5%, respectively (P=0.0004). CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective observational cohort, a longitudinal treatment pathway combining CRFA with intra-articular BoNT-A was associated with more sustained pain relief and functional improvement over 24 months than CRFA alone. Prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings and clarify the independent contributions of adjunctive and repeat intra-articular BoNT-A.</p>","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"32 ","pages":"e953720"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13596015/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.953720","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Cooled genicular radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) is used to treat symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA), although treatment response may decline over time. This study evaluated 24-month outcomes of CRFA alone versus CRFA combined with intra-articular botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A). MATERIAL AND METHODS In this retrospective observational comparative-effectiveness cohort study, 90 patients with moderate-to-severe knee OA underwent CRFA alone (n = 50) or CRFA plus intra-articular BoNT-A (n=40). The combination group received BoNT-A at baseline and a planned repeat injection at ~12 months. Pain and function were assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). The primary durability endpoint was the between-group difference in longitudinal NRS trajectories over 24 months, assessed using adjusted mixed-effects modeling. RESULTS Both groups demonstrated substantial early improvement; outcome trajectories diverged after ~12 months. Significant treatment-by-time interactions were observed for NRS (ß=-0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.21 to -0.47; P=0.0002) and WOMAC outcomes (ß=-6.3, 95% CI -9.4 to -3.2; P=0.0003). At 24 months, mean observed NRS scores were 4.2±2.3 after CRFA alone and 1.8±0.9 after CRFA plus BoNT-A; responder rates were 51.1% and 86.5%, respectively (P=0.0004). CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective observational cohort, a longitudinal treatment pathway combining CRFA with intra-articular BoNT-A was associated with more sustained pain relief and functional improvement over 24 months than CRFA alone. Prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings and clarify the independent contributions of adjunctive and repeat intra-articular BoNT-A.

膝关节骨性关节炎伴或不伴A型关节内肉毒杆菌毒素冷却射频消融后的长期疼痛和功能结局。
背景:冷却膝射频消融术(CRFA)被用于治疗症状性膝骨关节炎(OA),尽管治疗反应可能随着时间的推移而下降。本研究评估了单独使用CRFA与联合关节内A型肉毒毒素(BoNT-A)治疗的24个月的结果。材料和方法在这项回顾性观察性比较有效性队列研究中,90例中重度膝关节OA患者接受了单独的CRFA (n= 50)或CRFA +关节内BoNT-A (n=40)。联合组在基线时接受BoNT-A,并计划在12个月时重复注射。采用数值评定量表(NRS)和西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评估疼痛和功能。主要耐久性终点是24个月纵向NRS轨迹的组间差异,使用调整后的混合效应模型进行评估。结果两组均表现出明显的早期改善;结果轨迹在12个月后出现分化。在NRS (ß=-0.84, 95%可信区间[CI] -1.21至-0.47;P=0.0002)和WOMAC (ß=-6.3, 95% CI -9.4至-3.2;P=0.0003)中观察到显著的治疗时间相互作用。在24个月时,仅CRFA组平均观察到的NRS评分为4.2±2.3分,CRFA + BoNT-A组平均观察到的NRS评分为1.8±0.9分;应答率分别为51.1%和86.5% (P=0.0004)。结论:在本回顾性观察队列中,纵向治疗途径联合CRFA与关节内BoNT-A在24个月内比单独使用CRFA更能持续缓解疼痛和功能改善。需要前瞻性随机研究来证实这些发现,并澄清辅助和重复关节内BoNT-A的独立作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Science Monitor
Medical Science Monitor MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
514
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper. Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书