Cell-Free DNA Screening After Euploid Embryo Transfer: Concordance With Amniocentesis and Residual Aneuploidy Risk.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Prenatal Diagnosis Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-16 DOI:10.1002/pd.70249
Yao Lu, Yaqiong He, Yi Huang, Yichao Niu, Shuo Zhang, Yueping Zhang, Ting Zhang, Yun Sun
{"title":"Cell-Free DNA Screening After Euploid Embryo Transfer: Concordance With Amniocentesis and Residual Aneuploidy Risk.","authors":"Yao Lu, Yaqiong He, Yi Huang, Yichao Niu, Shuo Zhang, Yueping Zhang, Ting Zhang, Yun Sun","doi":"10.1002/pd.70249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess concordance between cell-free DNA screening and invasive prenatal diagnosis after single euploid embryo transfer following pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), and estimate residual chromosomal risk.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective cohort included 1079 singleton ongoing pregnancies after PGT-A between August 2019 and March 2024. Prenatal testing comprised cell-free DNA screening alone (n = 317), amniocentesis alone (n = 500), or both tests (n = 262). Chromosomal microarray analysis of amniocytes was the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the dual-testing cohort, eight pregnancies had high-risk cell-free DNA results, of which one was confirmed as 47, XXX. One low-risk result was subsequently diagnosed as sex chromosome mosaicism. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 50.0% (95% CI, 2.7-97.3), 97.3% (94.3-98.8), 12.5% (0.6-53.3) and 99.6% (97.5-99.9), respectively. Among 762 pregnancies undergoing amniocentesis, residual confirmed aneuploidy risk after euploid embryo transfer was 0.1% (1/762). The overall yield of clinically relevant CMA findings was 0.5% (4/762), including two pathogenic microdeletions. One pregnancy loss within 7 days after amniocentesis occurred (0.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After PGT-A, cell-free DNA screening showed high negative predictive value but limited positive predictive value. These findings support risk-stratified prenatal testing, while invasive diagnosis remains indicated after high-risk screening, abnormal ultrasound, or patient preference.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"1788-1795"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.70249","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess concordance between cell-free DNA screening and invasive prenatal diagnosis after single euploid embryo transfer following pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), and estimate residual chromosomal risk.

Method: This retrospective cohort included 1079 singleton ongoing pregnancies after PGT-A between August 2019 and March 2024. Prenatal testing comprised cell-free DNA screening alone (n = 317), amniocentesis alone (n = 500), or both tests (n = 262). Chromosomal microarray analysis of amniocytes was the reference standard.

Results: In the dual-testing cohort, eight pregnancies had high-risk cell-free DNA results, of which one was confirmed as 47, XXX. One low-risk result was subsequently diagnosed as sex chromosome mosaicism. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 50.0% (95% CI, 2.7-97.3), 97.3% (94.3-98.8), 12.5% (0.6-53.3) and 99.6% (97.5-99.9), respectively. Among 762 pregnancies undergoing amniocentesis, residual confirmed aneuploidy risk after euploid embryo transfer was 0.1% (1/762). The overall yield of clinically relevant CMA findings was 0.5% (4/762), including two pathogenic microdeletions. One pregnancy loss within 7 days after amniocentesis occurred (0.1%).

Conclusion: After PGT-A, cell-free DNA screening showed high negative predictive value but limited positive predictive value. These findings support risk-stratified prenatal testing, while invasive diagnosis remains indicated after high-risk screening, abnormal ultrasound, or patient preference.

整倍体胚胎移植后的无细胞DNA筛查:与羊膜穿刺术的一致性和残留的非整倍体风险。
目的:评估植入前非整倍体基因检测(PGT-A)后单整倍体胚胎移植后无细胞DNA筛查与侵入性产前诊断的一致性,并评估残留染色体风险。方法:该回顾性队列包括2019年8月至2024年3月期间1079例PGT-A后单胎妊娠。产前检查包括单独的无细胞DNA筛查(n = 317),单独的羊膜穿刺术(n = 500),或两项检查(n = 262)。羊膜细胞染色体微阵列分析为参考标准。结果:在双检测队列中,有8例妊娠出现高危无细胞DNA结果,其中1例被确认为47,xxx。一个低风险的结果随后被诊断为性染色体嵌合体。敏感性为50.0% (95% CI 2.7 ~ 97.3),特异性为97.3%(94.3 ~ 98.8),阳性预测值为12.5%(0.6 ~ 53.3),阴性预测值为99.6%(97.5 ~ 99.9)。在762例接受羊膜穿刺术的妊娠中,整倍体胚胎移植后确认的剩余非整倍体风险为0.1%(1/762)。临床相关CMA结果的总发生率为0.5%(4/762),包括两个致病性微缺失。羊膜穿刺术后7天内发生1例流产(0.1%)。结论:PGT-A后无细胞DNA筛查阴性预测值高,阳性预测值有限。这些发现支持风险分层产前检测,而侵入性诊断仍然需要在高风险筛查、异常超声或患者偏好后进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Diagnosis 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
204
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书