Yao Lu, Yaqiong He, Yi Huang, Yichao Niu, Shuo Zhang, Yueping Zhang, Ting Zhang, Yun Sun
{"title":"Cell-Free DNA Screening After Euploid Embryo Transfer: Concordance With Amniocentesis and Residual Aneuploidy Risk.","authors":"Yao Lu, Yaqiong He, Yi Huang, Yichao Niu, Shuo Zhang, Yueping Zhang, Ting Zhang, Yun Sun","doi":"10.1002/pd.70249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess concordance between cell-free DNA screening and invasive prenatal diagnosis after single euploid embryo transfer following pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), and estimate residual chromosomal risk.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective cohort included 1079 singleton ongoing pregnancies after PGT-A between August 2019 and March 2024. Prenatal testing comprised cell-free DNA screening alone (n = 317), amniocentesis alone (n = 500), or both tests (n = 262). Chromosomal microarray analysis of amniocytes was the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the dual-testing cohort, eight pregnancies had high-risk cell-free DNA results, of which one was confirmed as 47, XXX. One low-risk result was subsequently diagnosed as sex chromosome mosaicism. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 50.0% (95% CI, 2.7-97.3), 97.3% (94.3-98.8), 12.5% (0.6-53.3) and 99.6% (97.5-99.9), respectively. Among 762 pregnancies undergoing amniocentesis, residual confirmed aneuploidy risk after euploid embryo transfer was 0.1% (1/762). The overall yield of clinically relevant CMA findings was 0.5% (4/762), including two pathogenic microdeletions. One pregnancy loss within 7 days after amniocentesis occurred (0.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After PGT-A, cell-free DNA screening showed high negative predictive value but limited positive predictive value. These findings support risk-stratified prenatal testing, while invasive diagnosis remains indicated after high-risk screening, abnormal ultrasound, or patient preference.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"1788-1795"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.70249","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To assess concordance between cell-free DNA screening and invasive prenatal diagnosis after single euploid embryo transfer following pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), and estimate residual chromosomal risk.
Method: This retrospective cohort included 1079 singleton ongoing pregnancies after PGT-A between August 2019 and March 2024. Prenatal testing comprised cell-free DNA screening alone (n = 317), amniocentesis alone (n = 500), or both tests (n = 262). Chromosomal microarray analysis of amniocytes was the reference standard.
Results: In the dual-testing cohort, eight pregnancies had high-risk cell-free DNA results, of which one was confirmed as 47, XXX. One low-risk result was subsequently diagnosed as sex chromosome mosaicism. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 50.0% (95% CI, 2.7-97.3), 97.3% (94.3-98.8), 12.5% (0.6-53.3) and 99.6% (97.5-99.9), respectively. Among 762 pregnancies undergoing amniocentesis, residual confirmed aneuploidy risk after euploid embryo transfer was 0.1% (1/762). The overall yield of clinically relevant CMA findings was 0.5% (4/762), including two pathogenic microdeletions. One pregnancy loss within 7 days after amniocentesis occurred (0.1%).
Conclusion: After PGT-A, cell-free DNA screening showed high negative predictive value but limited positive predictive value. These findings support risk-stratified prenatal testing, while invasive diagnosis remains indicated after high-risk screening, abnormal ultrasound, or patient preference.
期刊介绍:
Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling