Omar Fayez Abbas, Aya Magdy Siam, Abdullah Almarfadi, Nour Aldin T Ahmed, Roaa Haddad, Ahmed Harb, Hannah Hurtig, Hasan Banihani, Mohamed Hamouda, Abdelrahman M Hamouda, Sherief Ghozy, Ram Kadrivel, Kogulavadanan Arumathurai, David F Kallmes
{"title":"Minocycline for neuroprotection in stroke and cerebral ischemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Omar Fayez Abbas, Aya Magdy Siam, Abdullah Almarfadi, Nour Aldin T Ahmed, Roaa Haddad, Ahmed Harb, Hannah Hurtig, Hasan Banihani, Mohamed Hamouda, Abdelrahman M Hamouda, Sherief Ghozy, Ram Kadrivel, Kogulavadanan Arumathurai, David F Kallmes","doi":"10.1007/s00234-026-04173-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke remains a leading cause of mortality and long-term disability worldwide, with substantial socioeconomic and healthcare burdens. Minocycline, a tetracycline antibiotic with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties and the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier, has emerged as a potential neuroprotective agent in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, clinical evidence remains inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of minocycline in patients with AIS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 2026 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating minocycline in adults with AIS. The primary outcomes were functional outcomes assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and neurological outcomes assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled as risk ratios (RRs), while continuous outcomes were synthesized as mean differences (MDs), each with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using random-effects meta-analysis with restricted maximum likelihood estimation. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman adjustment was applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven RCTs comprising 2,242 patients (1,113 receiving minocycline and 1,129 receiving placebo) were included. Minocycline was not associated with a statistically significant difference in continuous mRS scores at 90 days (MD = - 0.88; 95% CI: -4.03 to 2.28; p = 0.18; I² = 53.2%). Similarly, minocycline did not significantly improve excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1) (RR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.95-1.26; p = 0.14; I² = 0%) or functional independence (mRS 0-2) (RR = 1.05; 95% CI: 0.69-1.59; p = 0.76; I² = 65.2%). Similarly, minocycline was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in NIHSS scores at 90 days (MD = - 2.52; 95% CI: -5.37 to 0.33; p = 0.06) or improvement in BI scores (MD = 8.13; 95% CI: -29.32 to 45.58; p = 0.22). No significant differences were found in stroke recurrence (RR = 1.07; 95% CI: 0.70-1.61; p = 0.58) or mortality (RR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.40-1.20; p = 0.12).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Minocycline did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in functional or neurological outcomes at 90 days compared with the control group. The available evidence suggests no significant increase in stroke recurrence or mortality. Further large-scale, high-quality RCTs are warranted to clarify the potential neuroprotective effects of minocycline and determine its role in the routine management of AIS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19422,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-026-04173-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Stroke remains a leading cause of mortality and long-term disability worldwide, with substantial socioeconomic and healthcare burdens. Minocycline, a tetracycline antibiotic with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties and the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier, has emerged as a potential neuroprotective agent in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, clinical evidence remains inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of minocycline in patients with AIS.
Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 2026 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating minocycline in adults with AIS. The primary outcomes were functional outcomes assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and neurological outcomes assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled as risk ratios (RRs), while continuous outcomes were synthesized as mean differences (MDs), each with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using random-effects meta-analysis with restricted maximum likelihood estimation. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman adjustment was applied.
Results: Seven RCTs comprising 2,242 patients (1,113 receiving minocycline and 1,129 receiving placebo) were included. Minocycline was not associated with a statistically significant difference in continuous mRS scores at 90 days (MD = - 0.88; 95% CI: -4.03 to 2.28; p = 0.18; I² = 53.2%). Similarly, minocycline did not significantly improve excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1) (RR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.95-1.26; p = 0.14; I² = 0%) or functional independence (mRS 0-2) (RR = 1.05; 95% CI: 0.69-1.59; p = 0.76; I² = 65.2%). Similarly, minocycline was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in NIHSS scores at 90 days (MD = - 2.52; 95% CI: -5.37 to 0.33; p = 0.06) or improvement in BI scores (MD = 8.13; 95% CI: -29.32 to 45.58; p = 0.22). No significant differences were found in stroke recurrence (RR = 1.07; 95% CI: 0.70-1.61; p = 0.58) or mortality (RR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.40-1.20; p = 0.12).
Conclusions: Minocycline did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in functional or neurological outcomes at 90 days compared with the control group. The available evidence suggests no significant increase in stroke recurrence or mortality. Further large-scale, high-quality RCTs are warranted to clarify the potential neuroprotective effects of minocycline and determine its role in the routine management of AIS.
期刊介绍:
Neuroradiology aims to provide state-of-the-art medical and scientific information in the fields of Neuroradiology, Neurosciences, Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and related medical specialities. Neuroradiology as the official Journal of the European Society of Neuroradiology receives submissions from all parts of the world and publishes peer-reviewed original research, comprehensive reviews, educational papers, opinion papers, and short reports on exceptional clinical observations and new technical developments in the field of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention. The journal has subsections for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Advanced Neuroimaging, Paediatric Neuroradiology, Head-Neck-ENT Radiology, Spine Neuroradiology, and for submissions from Japan. Neuroradiology aims to provide new knowledge about and insights into the function and pathology of the human nervous system that may help to better diagnose and treat nervous system diseases. Neuroradiology is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follows the COPE core practices. Neuroradiology prefers articles that are free of bias, self-critical regarding limitations, transparent and clear in describing study participants, methods, and statistics, and short in presenting results. Before peer-review all submissions are automatically checked by iThenticate to assess for potential overlap in prior publication.