Minocycline for neuroprotection in stroke and cerebral ischemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Omar Fayez Abbas, Aya Magdy Siam, Abdullah Almarfadi, Nour Aldin T Ahmed, Roaa Haddad, Ahmed Harb, Hannah Hurtig, Hasan Banihani, Mohamed Hamouda, Abdelrahman M Hamouda, Sherief Ghozy, Ram Kadrivel, Kogulavadanan Arumathurai, David F Kallmes
{"title":"Minocycline for neuroprotection in stroke and cerebral ischemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Omar Fayez Abbas, Aya Magdy Siam, Abdullah Almarfadi, Nour Aldin T Ahmed, Roaa Haddad, Ahmed Harb, Hannah Hurtig, Hasan Banihani, Mohamed Hamouda, Abdelrahman M Hamouda, Sherief Ghozy, Ram Kadrivel, Kogulavadanan Arumathurai, David F Kallmes","doi":"10.1007/s00234-026-04173-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke remains a leading cause of mortality and long-term disability worldwide, with substantial socioeconomic and healthcare burdens. Minocycline, a tetracycline antibiotic with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties and the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier, has emerged as a potential neuroprotective agent in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, clinical evidence remains inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of minocycline in patients with AIS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 2026 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating minocycline in adults with AIS. The primary outcomes were functional outcomes assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and neurological outcomes assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled as risk ratios (RRs), while continuous outcomes were synthesized as mean differences (MDs), each with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using random-effects meta-analysis with restricted maximum likelihood estimation. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman adjustment was applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven RCTs comprising 2,242 patients (1,113 receiving minocycline and 1,129 receiving placebo) were included. Minocycline was not associated with a statistically significant difference in continuous mRS scores at 90 days (MD = - 0.88; 95% CI: -4.03 to 2.28; p = 0.18; I² = 53.2%). Similarly, minocycline did not significantly improve excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1) (RR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.95-1.26; p = 0.14; I² = 0%) or functional independence (mRS 0-2) (RR = 1.05; 95% CI: 0.69-1.59; p = 0.76; I² = 65.2%). Similarly, minocycline was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in NIHSS scores at 90 days (MD = - 2.52; 95% CI: -5.37 to 0.33; p = 0.06) or improvement in BI scores (MD = 8.13; 95% CI: -29.32 to 45.58; p = 0.22). No significant differences were found in stroke recurrence (RR = 1.07; 95% CI: 0.70-1.61; p = 0.58) or mortality (RR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.40-1.20; p = 0.12).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Minocycline did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in functional or neurological outcomes at 90 days compared with the control group. The available evidence suggests no significant increase in stroke recurrence or mortality. Further large-scale, high-quality RCTs are warranted to clarify the potential neuroprotective effects of minocycline and determine its role in the routine management of AIS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19422,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-026-04173-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stroke remains a leading cause of mortality and long-term disability worldwide, with substantial socioeconomic and healthcare burdens. Minocycline, a tetracycline antibiotic with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties and the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier, has emerged as a potential neuroprotective agent in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, clinical evidence remains inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of minocycline in patients with AIS.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 2026 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating minocycline in adults with AIS. The primary outcomes were functional outcomes assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and neurological outcomes assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled as risk ratios (RRs), while continuous outcomes were synthesized as mean differences (MDs), each with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using random-effects meta-analysis with restricted maximum likelihood estimation. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman adjustment was applied.

Results: Seven RCTs comprising 2,242 patients (1,113 receiving minocycline and 1,129 receiving placebo) were included. Minocycline was not associated with a statistically significant difference in continuous mRS scores at 90 days (MD = - 0.88; 95% CI: -4.03 to 2.28; p = 0.18; I² = 53.2%). Similarly, minocycline did not significantly improve excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1) (RR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.95-1.26; p = 0.14; I² = 0%) or functional independence (mRS 0-2) (RR = 1.05; 95% CI: 0.69-1.59; p = 0.76; I² = 65.2%). Similarly, minocycline was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in NIHSS scores at 90 days (MD = - 2.52; 95% CI: -5.37 to 0.33; p = 0.06) or improvement in BI scores (MD = 8.13; 95% CI: -29.32 to 45.58; p = 0.22). No significant differences were found in stroke recurrence (RR = 1.07; 95% CI: 0.70-1.61; p = 0.58) or mortality (RR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.40-1.20; p = 0.12).

Conclusions: Minocycline did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in functional or neurological outcomes at 90 days compared with the control group. The available evidence suggests no significant increase in stroke recurrence or mortality. Further large-scale, high-quality RCTs are warranted to clarify the potential neuroprotective effects of minocycline and determine its role in the routine management of AIS.

米诺环素对脑卒中和脑缺血的神经保护作用:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:中风仍然是世界范围内死亡和长期残疾的主要原因,具有巨大的社会经济和医疗负担。二甲胺四环素是一种四环素类抗生素,具有抗炎和抗氧化特性,并具有穿越血脑屏障的能力,已成为急性缺血性卒中(AIS)的潜在神经保护剂。然而,临床证据仍然不一致。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评价米诺环素治疗AIS患者的有效性和安全性。方法:我们系统地检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和Cochrane Library从成立到2026年2月的随机对照试验(rct),评估成人AIS患者的米诺环素治疗效果。主要结局是使用改良Rankin量表(mRS)评估的功能结局和使用美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评估的神经结局。采用限制最大似然估计的随机效应荟萃分析,将二分结果汇总为风险比(rr),将连续结果合成为平均差异(MDs),每个结果都有95%的置信区间(ci)。采用Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman平差。结果:纳入7项随机对照试验,包括2242例患者(1113例接受米诺环素治疗,1129例接受安慰剂治疗)。米诺环素与90天连续mRS评分无统计学意义差异(MD = - 0.88; 95% CI: -4.03 ~ 2.28; p = 0.18; I²= 53.2%)。同样,米诺环素并没有显著改善功能预后(mRS 0-1) (RR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.95-1.26; p = 0.14; I²= 0%)或功能独立性(mRS 0-2) (RR = 1.05; 95% CI: 0.69-1.59; p = 0.76; I²= 65.2%)。同样,米诺环素与90天NIHSS评分的统计学显著降低(MD = - 2.52; 95% CI: -5.37至0.33;p = 0.06)或BI评分的改善(MD = 8.13; 95% CI: -29.32至45.58;p = 0.22)无关。卒中复发率(RR = 1.07; 95% CI: 0.70-1.61; p = 0.58)和死亡率(RR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.40-1.20; p = 0.12)无显著差异。结论:与对照组相比,米诺环素在90天的功能或神经预后方面没有统计学上显著的改善。现有证据表明,卒中复发率或死亡率没有显著增加。需要进一步开展大规模、高质量的随机对照试验,以阐明米诺环素潜在的神经保护作用,并确定其在AIS常规治疗中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroradiology
Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
214
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuroradiology aims to provide state-of-the-art medical and scientific information in the fields of Neuroradiology, Neurosciences, Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and related medical specialities. Neuroradiology as the official Journal of the European Society of Neuroradiology receives submissions from all parts of the world and publishes peer-reviewed original research, comprehensive reviews, educational papers, opinion papers, and short reports on exceptional clinical observations and new technical developments in the field of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention. The journal has subsections for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Advanced Neuroimaging, Paediatric Neuroradiology, Head-Neck-ENT Radiology, Spine Neuroradiology, and for submissions from Japan. Neuroradiology aims to provide new knowledge about and insights into the function and pathology of the human nervous system that may help to better diagnose and treat nervous system diseases. Neuroradiology is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follows the COPE core practices. Neuroradiology prefers articles that are free of bias, self-critical regarding limitations, transparent and clear in describing study participants, methods, and statistics, and short in presenting results. Before peer-review all submissions are automatically checked by iThenticate to assess for potential overlap in prior publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书