Does glochidia infestation of the freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) affect foraging behavior and growth in brown trout (Salmo trutta)?

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 PARASITOLOGY
Niklas Wengström, Johan Höjesjö, Karl Filipsson, Lisa Loeb, Hampus Kvarnliden, Martin Österling
{"title":"Does glochidia infestation of the freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) affect foraging behavior and growth in brown trout (Salmo trutta)?","authors":"Niklas Wengström, Johan Höjesjö, Karl Filipsson, Lisa Loeb, Hampus Kvarnliden, Martin Österling","doi":"10.1007/s00436-026-08759-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fish serve as hosts to a wide range of parasites, which can affect them in many ways, including their survival, growth, and foraging behavior. The highly threatened unionid mussels have an ectoparasitic life stage on the gills, skin, or fins of fish. Here, we compared prey handling time and growth between groups of brown trout (Salmo trutta) that were infested and non-infested with glochidia larvae of the freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera). In a prey handling test, individual trout were presented with one large prey (maggot) and one small prey (Gammarus pulex) daily over eight days. Compared to non-infested trout, prey handling time was longer for infested trout feeding on larger but not on smaller prey. In a growth test, where trout were fed daily with minced calf liver over nine weeks, the growth rate was lower for infested than for non-infested trout. Moreover, the growth rate was higher for infested trout from which glochidia were expelled compared to trout from which glochidia were not expelled. We suggest that glochidia infestation can increase prey handling time of fish, ultimately reducing fish growth, but that slow prey handling may be transitory for fish losing glochidia, and result in compensatory growth of the fish. Slow prey handling, in combination with a negative effect of glochidia infestation on food competition between infested and non-infested trout, may be reasons behind the lower growth of infested fish.</p>","PeriodicalId":19968,"journal":{"name":"Parasitology Research","volume":"125 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13582126/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parasitology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-026-08759-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fish serve as hosts to a wide range of parasites, which can affect them in many ways, including their survival, growth, and foraging behavior. The highly threatened unionid mussels have an ectoparasitic life stage on the gills, skin, or fins of fish. Here, we compared prey handling time and growth between groups of brown trout (Salmo trutta) that were infested and non-infested with glochidia larvae of the freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera). In a prey handling test, individual trout were presented with one large prey (maggot) and one small prey (Gammarus pulex) daily over eight days. Compared to non-infested trout, prey handling time was longer for infested trout feeding on larger but not on smaller prey. In a growth test, where trout were fed daily with minced calf liver over nine weeks, the growth rate was lower for infested than for non-infested trout. Moreover, the growth rate was higher for infested trout from which glochidia were expelled compared to trout from which glochidia were not expelled. We suggest that glochidia infestation can increase prey handling time of fish, ultimately reducing fish growth, but that slow prey handling may be transitory for fish losing glochidia, and result in compensatory growth of the fish. Slow prey handling, in combination with a negative effect of glochidia infestation on food competition between infested and non-infested trout, may be reasons behind the lower growth of infested fish.

淡水珍珠贻贝(Margaritifera Margaritifera)的glochidia侵染是否影响褐鳟(Salmo trutta)的觅食行为和生长?
鱼类是各种寄生虫的宿主,这些寄生虫可以在许多方面影响它们,包括它们的生存、生长和觅食行为。高度受威胁的单孔贻贝在鱼的鳃、皮肤或鳍上有一个体外寄生的生命阶段。本研究比较了淡水珍珠贻贝(Margaritifera Margaritifera) glochidia幼虫侵染和未侵染褐鳟(Salmo trutta)的猎物处理时间和生长情况。在一项猎物处理测试中,每只鳟鱼在8天的时间里每天有一个大猎物(蛆)和一个小猎物(Gammarus pulex)。与未受感染的鳟鱼相比,受感染的鳟鱼以较大的猎物为食,而以较小的猎物为食,处理猎物的时间更长。在一项生长试验中,在9周的时间里,每天给鳟鱼喂食牛肝碎,受感染的鳟鱼的生长速度低于未受感染的鳟鱼。此外,除舌虫的侵染鳟鱼生长速度高于未除舌虫的侵染鳟鱼。我们认为舌虫侵染会增加鱼对猎物的处理时间,最终降低鱼的生长,但对失去舌虫的鱼来说,缓慢的猎物处理可能是暂时的,会导致鱼的代偿性生长。缓慢的猎物处理,再加上舌虫侵染对受侵染鳟鱼和未受侵染鳟鱼之间食物竞争的负面影响,可能是受侵染鳟鱼生长较低的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Parasitology Research
Parasitology Research 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The journal Parasitology Research covers the latest developments in parasitology across a variety of disciplines, including biology, medicine and veterinary medicine. Among many topics discussed are chemotherapy and control of parasitic disease, and the relationship of host and parasite. Other coverage includes: Protozoology, Helminthology, Entomology; Morphology (incl. Pathomorphology, Ultrastructure); Biochemistry, Physiology including Pathophysiology; Parasite-Host-Relationships including Immunology and Host Specificity; life history, ecology and epidemiology; and Diagnosis, Chemotherapy and Control of Parasitic Diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书