Development of the Attitude Scale Toward Nonpharmacological Methods in Postoperative Pain Management.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Özgür Tuğ, Emine İyigün
{"title":"Development of the Attitude Scale Toward Nonpharmacological Methods in Postoperative Pain Management.","authors":"Özgür Tuğ, Emine İyigün","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2026.08.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Nurses' attitudes toward nonpharmacological methods are critical to effective postoperative pain management. However, no validated scale specifically assesses nurses' attitudes toward these methods in surgical wards and surgical intensive care units. This study aimed to develop the Attitude Scale Toward Nonpharmacological Methods for Postoperative Pain Management and to evaluate its psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An exploratory sequential mixed-methods design was used.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the qualitative phase, an item pool was generated based on input from 30 nurses working in surgical settings. In the quantitative phase, psychometric properties were evaluated using data from 600 nurses employed in surgical wards and surgical intensive care units. Data were collected using a sociodemographic form and the developed scale. Validity, reliability, and test-retest reliability were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exploratory factor analysis revealed a three-factor structure that explained 59.272% of the total variance, and confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated acceptable model fit. Composite reliability and convergent/discriminant validity were within acceptable ranges. Known-groups validity indicated that surgical ward nurses had significantly higher attitude scores than surgical intensive care nurses, with a small effect size (Cohen's d = 0.217). The scale showed strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.88; McDonald's ω = 0.88) and good test-retest reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Attitude Scale Toward Nonpharmacological Methods in Postoperative Pain Management is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing nurses' attitudes in surgical care settings. Its use in nursing practice, education, and research may support educational and organizational interventions that integrate nonpharmacological methods into postoperative pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2026.08.013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Nurses' attitudes toward nonpharmacological methods are critical to effective postoperative pain management. However, no validated scale specifically assesses nurses' attitudes toward these methods in surgical wards and surgical intensive care units. This study aimed to develop the Attitude Scale Toward Nonpharmacological Methods for Postoperative Pain Management and to evaluate its psychometric properties.

Design: An exploratory sequential mixed-methods design was used.

Methods: In the qualitative phase, an item pool was generated based on input from 30 nurses working in surgical settings. In the quantitative phase, psychometric properties were evaluated using data from 600 nurses employed in surgical wards and surgical intensive care units. Data were collected using a sociodemographic form and the developed scale. Validity, reliability, and test-retest reliability were assessed.

Results: Exploratory factor analysis revealed a three-factor structure that explained 59.272% of the total variance, and confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated acceptable model fit. Composite reliability and convergent/discriminant validity were within acceptable ranges. Known-groups validity indicated that surgical ward nurses had significantly higher attitude scores than surgical intensive care nurses, with a small effect size (Cohen's d = 0.217). The scale showed strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.88; McDonald's ω = 0.88) and good test-retest reliability.

Conclusion: The Attitude Scale Toward Nonpharmacological Methods in Postoperative Pain Management is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing nurses' attitudes in surgical care settings. Its use in nursing practice, education, and research may support educational and organizational interventions that integrate nonpharmacological methods into postoperative pain management.

术后疼痛非药物治疗态度量表的编制。
目的:护士对非药物治疗方法的态度对有效的术后疼痛管理至关重要。然而,没有有效的量表专门评估护士对这些方法在外科病房和外科重症监护病房的态度。本研究旨在开发非药物治疗术后疼痛的态度量表,并评估其心理测量特性。设计:采用探索性顺序混合方法设计。方法:在定性阶段,根据30名在外科工作的护士的输入生成一个项目池。在定量阶段,使用来自外科病房和外科重症监护病房的600名护士的数据评估心理测量特性。使用社会人口统计表格和开发的量表收集数据。评估效度、信度和重测信度。结果:探索性因子分析显示三因素结构解释了59.272%的总方差,验证性因子分析显示模型拟合良好。复合信度和收敛/判别效度均在可接受范围内。已知组效度显示,外科病房护士的态度得分显著高于外科重症监护护士,但效应量较小(Cohen’s d = 0.217)。量表具有较强的内部一致性(Cronbach’s α = 0.88; McDonald’s ω = 0.88)和良好的重测信度。结论:术后疼痛非药物治疗态度量表是一种有效、可靠的评估外科护理护士态度的工具。它在护理实践、教育和研究中的应用可以支持将非药物方法整合到术后疼痛管理中的教育和组织干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书