Peter Santema, Eunbi Kwon, Luke Eberhart‐Hertel, Mihai Valcu, Bart Kempenaers
{"title":"A global latitudinal decline in breeding site fidelity emerges from a single biome","authors":"Peter Santema, Eunbi Kwon, Luke Eberhart‐Hertel, Mihai Valcu, Bart Kempenaers","doi":"10.1002/ecog.08440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Species that breed in multiple years can either return to the same location to reproduce between seasons or disperse to a different location. Previous studies have shown that breeding site fidelity varies with species‐ and individual‐specific traits, but much of the observed variation remains unexplained. Breeding site fidelity may also vary latitudinally, given that key ecological factors relevant for breeding such as seasonality, resource availability, and habitat stability show strong latitudinal gradients. We examined variation in breeding site fidelity among shorebirds, using 189 estimates of local return rate from 120 populations of 55 species. We first show that there is a strong non‐linear latitudinal pattern in breeding site fidelity, with return rates being stable at lower latitudes and progressively decreasing towards higher latitudes. We then show that this effect is driven entirely by the tundra biome: in the tundra – but not in other biomes – return rates decrease sharply with latitude, resulting in overall lower return rates in the tundra compared to other biomes. We suggest that the high inter‐annual variability in local breeding conditions and short window for reproduction that characterize the tundra, especially at higher latitudes, favor breeding dispersal and hence lead to low site fidelity. Our findings show that an apparent global latitudinal trend in a life‐history trait can be driven by a single biome.","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ecog.08440","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Species that breed in multiple years can either return to the same location to reproduce between seasons or disperse to a different location. Previous studies have shown that breeding site fidelity varies with species‐ and individual‐specific traits, but much of the observed variation remains unexplained. Breeding site fidelity may also vary latitudinally, given that key ecological factors relevant for breeding such as seasonality, resource availability, and habitat stability show strong latitudinal gradients. We examined variation in breeding site fidelity among shorebirds, using 189 estimates of local return rate from 120 populations of 55 species. We first show that there is a strong non‐linear latitudinal pattern in breeding site fidelity, with return rates being stable at lower latitudes and progressively decreasing towards higher latitudes. We then show that this effect is driven entirely by the tundra biome: in the tundra – but not in other biomes – return rates decrease sharply with latitude, resulting in overall lower return rates in the tundra compared to other biomes. We suggest that the high inter‐annual variability in local breeding conditions and short window for reproduction that characterize the tundra, especially at higher latitudes, favor breeding dispersal and hence lead to low site fidelity. Our findings show that an apparent global latitudinal trend in a life‐history trait can be driven by a single biome.
期刊介绍:
ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem.
Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography.
Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.