When Sport Becomes Politics: Agenda Setting & Ideological Polarization in Collegiate Athletics Coverage

IF 2.5 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Chris Corr, Molly Harry, Branden Johnson
{"title":"When Sport Becomes Politics: Agenda Setting & Ideological Polarization in Collegiate Athletics Coverage","authors":"Chris Corr, Molly Harry, Branden Johnson","doi":"10.1177/21674795261481698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increasing politicization of sport has positioned collegiate athletics as a key site of ideological discourse. Guided by agenda setting theory, this study examined how national news outlets construct collegiate athletics content on social media. From an analysis of 6,436 Twitter/X posts published from 2014 to 2024 from nine prominent news organizations in the United States with established political orientations, we used thematic and sentiment analyses to assess topic salience and ideological framing of collegiate athletics content. Findings demonstrate that National Collegiate Athletic Association governance, legal disputes, and cultural issues dominate coverage, reflecting first-level agenda setting. Although most posts were neutral in tone, portrayal of collegiate athletics varied across outlets, particularly regarding athlete compensation, gender equity, and transgender participation. Such findings indicate second-level agenda setting while politically polarizing topics generated disproportionate engagement among users. These findings suggest collegiate athletics operates as a discursive arena where media agendas shape public understanding within an increasingly polarized digital environment.","PeriodicalId":46882,"journal":{"name":"Communication & Sport","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication & Sport","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795261481698","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing politicization of sport has positioned collegiate athletics as a key site of ideological discourse. Guided by agenda setting theory, this study examined how national news outlets construct collegiate athletics content on social media. From an analysis of 6,436 Twitter/X posts published from 2014 to 2024 from nine prominent news organizations in the United States with established political orientations, we used thematic and sentiment analyses to assess topic salience and ideological framing of collegiate athletics content. Findings demonstrate that National Collegiate Athletic Association governance, legal disputes, and cultural issues dominate coverage, reflecting first-level agenda setting. Although most posts were neutral in tone, portrayal of collegiate athletics varied across outlets, particularly regarding athlete compensation, gender equity, and transgender participation. Such findings indicate second-level agenda setting while politically polarizing topics generated disproportionate engagement among users. These findings suggest collegiate athletics operates as a discursive arena where media agendas shape public understanding within an increasingly polarized digital environment.
当体育成为政治:大学体育报道的议程设置与意识形态极化
体育运动的日益政治化使大学体育运动成为意识形态话语的关键场所。在议程设置理论的指导下,本研究考察了国家新闻媒体如何在社交媒体上构建大学体育内容。通过对2014年至2024年美国9家具有既定政治取向的知名新闻机构发布的6436条Twitter/X帖子的分析,我们使用主题和情绪分析来评估大学体育内容的主题突出性和意识形态框架。研究结果表明,全国大学体育协会治理、法律纠纷和文化问题主导了报道,反映了一级议程设置。尽管大多数帖子的语气都是中性的,但不同媒体对大学体育运动的描述各不相同,尤其是在运动员薪酬、性别平等和跨性别参与方面。这些发现表明,在政治上两极分化的话题在用户中产生不成比例的参与时,二级议程设置。这些发现表明,大学体育作为一个话语竞技场,媒体议程塑造公众的理解在日益两极分化的数字环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书