Single-time-point renal TIA estimation, sparse SPECT/CT data, and nonlinear mixed-effects modelling in [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 therapy.

IF 4.2
Fira Dwi Ananda, Deni Hardiansyah, Rien Ritawidya, Ambros J Beer, Ludovic Ferrer, Nicolas Varmenot, Gerhard Glatting
{"title":"Single-time-point renal TIA estimation, sparse SPECT/CT data, and nonlinear mixed-effects modelling in [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 therapy.","authors":"Fira Dwi Ananda, Deni Hardiansyah, Rien Ritawidya, Ambros J Beer, Ludovic Ferrer, Nicolas Varmenot, Gerhard Glatting","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2026.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the feasibility of Single-Time-Point (STP) renal Time-Integrated Activity (TIA) estimation using Population-Based Model Selection (PBMS) and Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Modelling (NLMEM) with sparse time-activity data in [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Kidney biokinetics of [1<sup>77</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 from 64 metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients were collected at TP1=(4.8±0.9h)(n=62),TP2=(24.5±1.5 h)(n=6),TP3=(94.0±6.6h)(n=16),and TP4=(128.5±12.7h)(n=47) post-injection with 1-4 data per patient. Six sum-of-exponentials functions (4-7 adjustable parameters) were fitted to all-time-point (ATP) data using NLMEM, evaluating combinations of fixed effects, inter-individual, and residual variability. The best-supported PBMS-NLMEM model was used to derive the ATP-based internal comparator TIA. Agreement between STP-derived TIAs and ATP-based internal comparator TIAs was quantified using relative deviation (RD), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and root-mean-square error (RMSE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on PBMS-NLMEM analysis, function [Formula: see text] with a fixed-effect value of λ<sub>3</sub>=7.19×10<sup>-2</sup>/h, residual variability of 0.079, and inter-individual variabilities of A<sub>3</sub>=0.38 and λ<sub>3</sub>=0.52 assigned from the literature was selected as the best function for TIA estimation. STP TIA estimation with NLMEM showed better agreement than Hänscheid's method across all investigated TPs. Moreover, NLMEM-based STP estimation was technically feasible at each TP, with maximum RMSE and MAPE values of 25.2% and 16.5%, respectively. However, findings should be interpreted cautiously because patient subsets differed across TPs, particularly at TP2(n=6).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this retrospective sparse-data cohort, PBMS-NLMEM-based STP renal TIA estimation was technically feasible at the investigated TPs and showed agreement with an ATP-based internal comparator, with MAPE below 16.5%. Prospective validation in balanced cohorts is required before recommending a specific STP imaging window or clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":101315,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2026.09.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluates the feasibility of Single-Time-Point (STP) renal Time-Integrated Activity (TIA) estimation using Population-Based Model Selection (PBMS) and Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Modelling (NLMEM) with sparse time-activity data in [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 therapy.

Methods: Kidney biokinetics of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 from 64 metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients were collected at TP1=(4.8±0.9h)(n=62),TP2=(24.5±1.5 h)(n=6),TP3=(94.0±6.6h)(n=16),and TP4=(128.5±12.7h)(n=47) post-injection with 1-4 data per patient. Six sum-of-exponentials functions (4-7 adjustable parameters) were fitted to all-time-point (ATP) data using NLMEM, evaluating combinations of fixed effects, inter-individual, and residual variability. The best-supported PBMS-NLMEM model was used to derive the ATP-based internal comparator TIA. Agreement between STP-derived TIAs and ATP-based internal comparator TIAs was quantified using relative deviation (RD), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and root-mean-square error (RMSE).

Results: Based on PBMS-NLMEM analysis, function [Formula: see text] with a fixed-effect value of λ3=7.19×10-2/h, residual variability of 0.079, and inter-individual variabilities of A3=0.38 and λ3=0.52 assigned from the literature was selected as the best function for TIA estimation. STP TIA estimation with NLMEM showed better agreement than Hänscheid's method across all investigated TPs. Moreover, NLMEM-based STP estimation was technically feasible at each TP, with maximum RMSE and MAPE values of 25.2% and 16.5%, respectively. However, findings should be interpreted cautiously because patient subsets differed across TPs, particularly at TP2(n=6).

Conclusion: In this retrospective sparse-data cohort, PBMS-NLMEM-based STP renal TIA estimation was technically feasible at the investigated TPs and showed agreement with an ATP-based internal comparator, with MAPE below 16.5%. Prospective validation in balanced cohorts is required before recommending a specific STP imaging window or clinical implementation.

在[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617治疗中,单时间点肾脏TIA估计、稀疏SPECT/CT数据和非线性混合效应建模。
目的:本研究在[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617治疗中,利用基于人群的模型选择(PBMS)和非线性混合效应模型(NLMEM),评估单时间点(STP)肾脏时间积分活动(TIA)估计的可行性。方法:收集64例转移性去雄抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者的[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617在注射后TP1=(4.8±0.9h)(n=62)、TP2=(24.5±1.5 h)(n=6)、TP3=(94.0±6.6h)(n=16)、TP4=(128.5±12.7h)(n=47)时的肾脏生物动力学数据,每例1-4个数据。使用NLMEM将6个指数和函数(4-7个可调参数)拟合到所有时间点(ATP)数据中,评估固定效应、个体间效应和剩余变异性的组合。使用最支持的PBMS-NLMEM模型推导基于atp的内部比较器TIA。采用相对偏差(RD)、平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)和均方根误差(RMSE)对stp衍生TIAs和基于atp的内部比较TIAs之间的一致性进行量化。结果:基于PBMS-NLMEM分析,选择文献中给定的固定效应值为λ3=7.19×10-2/h,残差变异性为0.079,个体间变异性为A3=0.38和λ3=0.52的函数[公式:见文]作为TIA估计的最佳函数。在所有被调查的tp中,用NLMEM估计STP TIA比Hänscheid的方法显示出更好的一致性。此外,基于nlmems的STP估计在技术上是可行的,RMSE和MAPE的最大值分别为25.2%和16.5%。然而,研究结果应谨慎解释,因为不同TPs的患者亚群不同,特别是TP2(n=6)。结论:在这个回顾性稀疏数据队列中,基于pbms - nlmems的STP肾TIA估计在技术上是可行的,并且与基于atp的内部比较器一致,MAPE低于16.5%。在推荐特定的STP成像窗口或临床实施之前,需要在平衡队列中进行前瞻性验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书